IMPORTANCE OF WOMEN REPRESENTATION

1. IMPORTANCE OF WOMEN REPRESENTATION some myth breaking points about women representation www.eduminatti.com

2. Opting for gender as it is a closer experience, we would like to focus on why we must hand on access to platforms of privilege to the marginalized, over speaking on their behalf, about their experiences as they watch from the sidelines. Conversations of social constructs like gender need to be looked at intersectionality. Academic discourse is infamous for having at the center stage only straight, male, white voices. A paradigm shift here needs to make the information young, and impressionable minds process more representative. many girls schools in Dehradun teach their students about importance of women representation. www.eduminatti.com

3. SOME STATISTICS RELATED TO WOMEN BEING REPRESENTED IN INDIA In India, Only 20.3% of women above the age of 15 are in the workforce – a decline of almost 12 percentage points from 31.7% in 2005. The employment rate of urban Indian women was about 5.4 percent in February 2021. In 2019, women held more than 44 percent of the seats in India's Panchayati Raj Institution (PRI). Compared to the figures obtained in 2014, the participation of women decreased slightly. "In India, more than 4 in 5 working women (85 per cent) claim to have missed out on a raise, promotion, or work offer because of their gender, compared to the regional average of 60 per cent," Women owned a little over 20 percent of all micro, small and medium businesses across India compared to nearly 80 percent among men in financial year 2021. www.eduminatti.com

4. REPRESENTATION Writing is always imbued with passion; it relates to our existence. Hence, even if brilliant and engaging, our stories will never be honest unless said in the first person. These narratives are not mere fables; they tell us of a people we will never live like. Patriarchy is not a symptom, but the system itself, rotten at its core. It shows that the modern world was built by the male specimen, to paraphrase Greta Thunberg. Men cannot write of women because the fact that our experiences vary astronomically is overlooked. The advances in feminization have now extended to branches of persecution; Americans write about poverty, two out of three of the beggars are now women. I’d be mistaken if I believed these were the strides we wanted to take as a collective. And the fact that gender in mainstream conversations is no longer a binary baffles those protected by the status quo. ‘Trans Lives Matter’ and ‘Gender is a social construct’ is a sentence every politically aware and charged youngster our generation will tell you. But are the people we bring to houses of change listening? Voices in protest will always come from the forced periphery, and it is our duty as a people to give it centrality for it to influence the money that flows, the seats in power occupied. We must teach youth tales of those who do not define the norm. www.eduminatti.com

5. MIS-MANIPULATION OF REPRESENTATION It is easy to mistake that the change harbinger is enough because we are not taught to see critically. Why are movies written about women by everyone but them? Why do the prominent hold others back in their progress? Because the current structures teach us that our ideals of contentment and success come at the cost of others. Empathy as a mass emotion holds no ground. Sympathy has often driven artists to create; photographers take pictures of the ailing in hutments; everyone’s second aunt writes of oppression when our armed forces are attacked. But this feeling only lends a sense of sociability to our actions. Regardless of intention, our visualization and persuasion in matters of the world will always be lacking, as our agency is handicapped, for it is not originally ours. Like Adam Smith had said, our interest and imagination delude the right thing to be said. However, unfortunately, the lopsided continues as these self-styled representatives comment on lives and legacies that are not their own. Another thing to add, sympathy is distant; it looks from far away and feels sorry. This is misplaced for the purposes it seeks to serve. The concern is, more often than not, egotistical and narrow. This dynamic should not be simplified in terms of rewarding those who come out on top or labeling those who speak against it as courageous. Instead, identify the horrible need to have to do these things in the first place. We survive in a matrix of domination, and feminist thought of all colors, races, and sexualities must be allowed to breathe. www.eduminatti.com

6. GENDER BIAS One may argue about the merits of bias, speedy scrutiny, aiding choice, and target detection; the list will go on for as long as we want to distract. But this is a thin line when we talk of Oppression Olympics within an institution as pervasive as this one. Of course, this is a process of community learning and unlearning, and it is not like the marginalized sustain themselves on a vendetta. But while that explains things to an extent, it does not make justification or reparation. Moving ahead must be about affirmative action. The intention is too flaky a basis. No statistical power drives this model, and the heightened tolerability of the damned must not be condoned. Write and write of lives you have not lived, not for them. Borrow what is not yours instead of adopting a haphazard amalgamation which is just shades of the governing with the hint of the rest. There needs to be an account of the unheard and unacknowledged, for if circumstance forbids current subjugators do not engage with, their successors do. Work must not fetishize the female experience. www.eduminatti.com

7. THE RIGHT PATH Something as persuasive and personal as literature should especially honor the sanctity of the writer. Mothers teach their children to write from our hearts and not our egos, but how do we write honestly when the material we jot by ‘digging deep’ is a false or stolen construct? Makes you wonder why rapists like Alfred Hitchock and Pablo Neruda are still being shoved down our throats in the school curriculum. Movements span decades and draw from a common body of work, making it essential for truths spoken here to be evergreen. We can achieve that by having those at the help who have been blindsided for these very decades. It is powerful, ever-evolving, and persevering and, thus, should not be boxed into typical characters holding the mic. To be dramatic, books are the harmony of people, but if not all of them get to participate, we repeatedly choose to leave out those who continue to exist for our comfort and insulation. There will come those in the revolution who shall demand every single one to walk astride, and then this topples. As per the international schools in Dehradun, It is also imperative to see microaggressions (subtle discriminations). Often, neutrality and invisibility are a bigger crime in gaps in rights and liberties. To answer the question shortly, yes, a writer’s experience as a member of a particular group comes through their work’s raw authenticity. Ethically anyway, it is only and only their position to occupy. www.eduminatti.com

8. FOR MORE REACH OUT TO US AT WWW.EDUMINATTI.COM