1 / 13

NASF Aviation Survey Results

NASF Aviation Survey Results. STATES THAT RESPONDED AL, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FL, ID, IN, KS, KY, MA, MD, ME, MN, MT, NC, ND, NH, NJ, NM, OR, TX, UT, WA, WI, WV. NASF Aviation Survey Results. Does your state have wildfire aviation resources that you are willing to share with other states? Yes – 15

ehren
Télécharger la présentation

NASF Aviation Survey Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NASF Aviation Survey Results STATES THAT RESPONDED • AL, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FL, ID, IN, KS, KY, MA, MD, ME, MN, MT, NC, ND, NH, NJ, NM, OR, TX, UT, WA, WI, WV

  2. NASF Aviation Survey Results • Does your state have wildfire aviation resources that you are willing to share with other states? • Yes – 15 • No- 1 • N/A- 10 • With other provinces? • Yes – 9 • No- 5 • N/A- 11

  3. NASF Aviation Survey Results Is your state willing to accept other states’ wildfire aviation resources? • Yes – 25 • No- 0 • N/A- 1 Other provincial aviation assets? • Yes – 17 • No- 2 • N/A- 7

  4. NASF Aviation Survey Results Does your state feel there is a need to establish a separate aviation resource sharing system? (Beyond the National Fire Mobilization System) • Yes – 16 • No- 5 • N/A- 4

  5. NASF Aviation Survey Results Why? • (15) State/Compact exchanges need to remain in place • (2) Current National System does not allow states to maintain control of release/return of resources • (2) Current National System does not provide access to many available resources

  6. NASF Aviation Survey Results Why Not? • There are limited aerial resources available for long distance sharing • State aircraft are limited to initial attack and not for extended attack • (2) Would be easier if state & compact resources could be dispatched via National System • (2) Federal resources are locally available

  7. NASF Aviation Survey Results What changes could be made to the national interagency mobilization system to improve states’ ability to share aviation resources? • (6) Allow states to accept aircraft that meet FAA & Safety standards but don’t meet USDA or DOI standards • (4) Need to be able to list state/compact resources in ROSS system • (2) Acceptance of state qualifications and policies by federal agencies • (2) Don’t want National Mobe System to control state assets • Standardized aircraft inspection process • Improve access to military resources • Uniform aviation policies and procedures • Pre-season carding of aircraft

  8. NASF Aviation Survey Results Does your state feel comfortable sharing aviation resources between states under current “Compact to “Compact statutory language? • Yes – 20 • No- 4 • N/A- 2

  9. NASF Aviation Survey Results If your state is not comfortable, why? • Issue with locating, tracking, billing for resources. • Issue with mixing resources that meet different standards (federal and state/compact) • (2) No statutory language for inter-compact resource sharing.

  10. NASF Aviation Survey Results Does your state have the approval/authority to share aviation resources outside existing Compact agreements? • Yes – 9 • No- 10 • N/A- 5

  11. NASF Aviation Survey Results What concerns does your state have relating to expanding the mobilization/sharing of your aviation resources? (Examples: Ability to support agency aircraft remotely, Liabilities/Insurances, Accelerated maintenance times)

  12. (7) Efficient reimbursement (5) Liability issues (2) State needs to retain control of its aviation assets for release/return (2) Safety standards by the sending agency (2) Transportation of aircraft over great distances Maintaining availability of aircraft within own state Accelerated maintenance time for equipment Replacement of materials and parts used by other states Need to conform to national interagency standards Issues with contract pilots and associates relating to out of state travel authority Would like to be part of a compact

  13. NASF Aviation Survey Results Is your state willing to share aviation assets with other states for missions other than Wildfire suppression? (i.e., non-emergencies, management work, fuels, prescribed burning) • Yes – 12 • No- 6 • N/A- 7

More Related