1 / 17

Моделирование электромагнитного форм-фактора протона во времени-подобной области в среде PandaRoot

Моделирование электромагнитного форм-фактора протона во времени-подобной области в среде PandaRoot. Д . Морозов ИФВЭ ( Протвино ). Outline. Introduction Experimental setup FSC PandaRoot Development Generators What is also needed Near term plans Conclusions. Introduction.

elaine-hunt
Télécharger la présentation

Моделирование электромагнитного форм-фактора протона во времени-подобной области в среде PandaRoot

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Моделирование электромагнитного форм-фактора протона во времени-подобной области в среде PandaRoot Д. Морозов ИФВЭ (Протвино)

  2. Outline • Introduction • Experimental setup • FSC PandaRoot Development • Generators • What is also needed • Near term plans • Conclusions

  3. Introduction • The electromagnetic probe is an excellent tool to investigate the structure of the nucleon • GE and GM of the proton parametrize the hadronic current in the ME for e-p → e-pand in its crossed processp+p- → e+e-

  4. Introduction • Matrix element for elastic electron proton scattering in the frame of one-photon exchange: • k1(p1), k2(p2) - four-momenta of the initial and final electron (nucleon) • u(k) ,u(p) – spinors • q = k1 - k2, q2 < 0 • Annihilation - k2(p2) change sign and q2 = s

  5. Introduction • Annihilation process - access positive q2 (time-like) from q2 = 4m2p • Unitarity of ME: • space-like FFs are real functions of q2 • time-like - complex functions • In the Breit frame, space-like FFs have concrete interpretations, they are the Fourier transforms of the spatial charge (GE) and the magnetization distribution (GM) of the proton • slope at q2 = 0 gives the charge and magnetization radius of the proton • In time-like region, FFs reflect the frequency spectrum of the electromagnetic response of the nucleon • two complementary aspects of nucleon structure can be studied • complete description of the electromagnetic FF over full q2 range.

  6. Introduction • Estimation: PANDA will be able to get |GE|and|GM| in time-like domain from ~5 (GeV/c)2 up to ~14 (GeV/c)2by measuring angular distribution of p+p- → e+e-. GM up to 22 (GeV/c)2by measuring total cross section • Unpolorized diff. cross section: where τ = q2/4m2p • independent measurements of |GE|and|GM| • Only BABAR and LEAR had enough statistics to extract |GE|and|GM| independently, but accuracy on R= |GE|/|GM| is ~ 50%. • PANDA aim is few % in 107 sec

  7. FF in space-like region (JLab) JLAB arXiv:1102.2463 [nucl-ex]

  8. Introduction • The challenge is to suppress the huge background from hadronic channels. It’s ~106 times higher in cross section then signal e+e- • π+π-, K+K- • EMC is ~20X0 ~ λ0: 30% of hadronic interactions, charge exchange is the most harmful • can produce deposition as e with same momentum • π0π0 • one(two) Dalitz decay e+e-γ with 1% branching still big enough • direct decay then conversion in material • e+e-X, where X – mesons, lepton pairs, photons • direct e+e-X • produced γ materializes in detector material • a good e/pion separation is mandatory up to ~15 GeV/c • PID from each detector and kinematical constrained have to be exploited

  9. Experimental setup • Pipe • Central spectrometer • Solenoid Magnet • TPC (STT) → PID, tracking • MVD → vertex, tracking • EMC: Barrel, Endcaps → PID • TOF → c PID (0.3 – 1 GeV) • MDT → PID muon • GEM → tracking • DIRC → charged PID • Forward spectrometer • Dipole Magnet • EMC: FSC → PID • Forward DIRC(DSK)→ c PID • DCH → tracking • FTOF → charged PID • FTS: straw tubes→tracking

  10. FSC PandaRoot Development • Geometry • emc_module5_fsc.root in 16 and 17 GeometryVersions • 1496 modules (54x28 with 4x4 spacing) • cell 5.5 x 5.5 x 67.5 cm3 consists of 380 lead (0.275 mm ) scintillator (1.5 mm ) layers • wrapped by tyvek and black paper • 6x6 optical fibers 1.4 mm thick docked to PMT photocathode by a single bunch • Macro to create geometry • PndEmc class modified to load geometry • PndEmcStructure class modified to transform the cells coordinates to the global system of geometrical indexes (for fast searching and cluster formation) • PndEmcHit and PndEmcHitProducer updated to collect the hits from transport code at VMC level

  11. FSC PandaRoot Development • Digitization model • Hit → electronics signal shape (Waveform): PndEmcHitsToWaveform • Signal shape: analytic function of RC-CR circuit with • Tint = 5nsec — integration time, • Tdiff = 20 nsec — differential time and • Tsig = 15 nsec — time of raising the signal in shashlyk module • For each hit discrete signal shape simulating SADC was built up • Nsamples = 20 — the number of SADC counts • SampleRate = 180 Mhz — ADC rate • NPhotonsPerMev = 21 — N of photons per 1 MeV of deposited energy • ENF = 1.3 – excess noise factor for PMT • Gaussian incoherent electronics noise with 3 MeV width added to each ADC bin • the signal was converted to the integer value in each bin • Waveform → ADC digitized signal in energy units: PndEmcWaveformToDigi • maximum was searched inside each digitized signal shape: magnitude → value, position→ time of signal arrival • Absolute value normalization by 1 GeV delta function signal as input • Cells with Edigi > EdigiThreshold= 8 MeV are stored for the following analysis

  12. FSC PandaRoot Development • Energy resolution for Digi hits • σE/E = (3.0 ± 0.1)%/√E + (0.6 ± 0.1)% • Compare to test beam • σE/E = (2.8 ± 0.2)%/√E + (1.3 ± 0.1)% • Utilize the algorithms for cluster finding and bumps splitting already implemented in EMC code • Absent: • e PID → shower shape analysis (it’s different compare to PWO) • E1/E9 (E1/E25) • lateral moment of the cluster • a set of zernike moments (radial and angular dependent polynomials) • parameters are partially correlated • Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) may be applied (for PWO as well). The training of the MLP requires big set of single tracks for e, μ, π, K and p • Leakage correction for FSC

  13. MLP output example • PWO in BABAR framework

  14. Generators • Signal channel – exist in PandaRoot • Background – absent but in preparation • Extrapolationof experimental data

  15. What is also needed • Forward tracking? • CPU/Storage • About 5∙108 events need to be simulated • Requires at least 30 TB of disk space • Now: local cluster (400 CPU, no space) is not sufficient. PANDA Grid can be used? • In a ~1 year: the hope is to have ~50 TB and cluster will be helpful for PANDA • IHEP cluster can be incorporated to PANDA Grid

  16. Near term plans • Finish FSC reco code • Shower shape parameters for shashlyk modules • MLP training? • Leakage • Generator issues • Production of MC data • Background suppression • PID cuts • Kinematical constrains • Efficiencies

  17. Conclusions • FSC in PandaRoot is implemented • Some tuning and e PID required • Time like form-factor could be interesting but challenging • High hadronic background • Huge amount of events → storage • IHEP might be a part of Panda Grid

More Related