1 / 91

RTI and PBS: The Basics and a Blueprint for Implementation

RTI and PBS: The Basics and a Blueprint for Implementation. Jason E. Harlacher, PhD, NCSP Washoe County School District; Reno, NV Heidi Mathie Mucha, PhD Utah Personnel Development Center; Salt Lake City, UT. jasonharlacher@gmail.com heidim@updc.org. Agenda. Principles behind RTI and PBS

elaine
Télécharger la présentation

RTI and PBS: The Basics and a Blueprint for Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RTI and PBS: The Basics and a Blueprint for Implementation Jason E. Harlacher, PhD, NCSP Washoe County School District; Reno, NV Heidi Mathie Mucha, PhD Utah Personnel Development Center; Salt Lake City, UT jasonharlacher@gmail.com heidim@updc.org

  2. Agenda • Principles behind RTI and PBS • Features of RTI • One example of RTI • Features of PBS • One example of PBS • Process of Implementation • Questions/Info Sharing Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  3. Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  4. One Perspective on History Talented & Gifted Special Education Title I Regular Education Tutors Parents Universities After-School ELL/ESL Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  5. Basic Definitions • Response to Intervention (RTI) and Positive Behavior Supports (PBS) are school-wide prevention models. Provide a range of supports to students by restructuring how schools deliver services. • RTI = academics • PBS = behavior Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  6. Principles of RTI/PBS • Proactive and Preventative • Instructional Match • Problem Solving Focused and Data-based Decisions • Effective Practices • School-wide Approach Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  7. 1. Proactive and Preventative • Identify and intervene before problems occur or become entrenched. • Screening all students • Range of supports Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  8. 2. Instructional Match • Level of support matches need. • Examine all areas that affect the student. • Instructional approach (with behavior too) Academic and Behavioral Curriculum Instruction & Environment Learner

  9. 3. Problem Solving Focused & Data-based Decisions • Use of the problem solving model to guide decisions around intervention/support. • Gap between what isexpected and what occurs • What is the problem? 3. What can we do about the problem? • Why is it happening? 4. Did the intervention/plan work?

  10. 3. Problem-Solving Focused & Data-based Decisions “Without data, you’re just another person with an opinion”.

  11. 4. Effective Practices • Use research-based, validated practices • To ensure students have the best chance of success • Includes consideration of fidelity/integrity Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  12. 5. Schoolwide Approach • Apply model to whole-school • As opposed to one student or one classroom. • Creates continuity, clarity, and consistency.

  13. Pause • Share with a neighbor something that sticks out from what we just went over. Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  14. Features of RTI • Tiers of Instructional Support • Assessment System • Protocol • Evidence-based Instruction • Ongoing Professional Development Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  15. 1) Tiers of Instructional Support Universal Level/Tier I: Core instruction (90/60 minutes), whole/small group Secondary Level/Tier II: Core + 45 minutes small-group (5-8:1), skill-based Tertiary Level/Tier III: Core + 30 mins (3-5:1), individualized (can replace or be in addition to Tier II ) Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  16. 2) Assessment System • Complete system used to screen, diagnose difficulties, and to progress monitor • Screener = brief, indicates if student is at-risk for academic difficulties or not • Is student on grade level or not? • Diagnostic = more comprehensive and longer test that teases out strengths vs. weaknesses • Why is student scoring below grade level or at risk? • Formative = quick checks to determine if instructional program is effective for student or not • Is the current plan working? Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  17. 2) Assessment System Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  18. 2) Assessment System • Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) is a standardized method of assessment. • Reliable, valid, standardized, sensitive to growth, efficient Is the student at risk? (screener) Is the instructional plan effective? (progress monitoring/formative assessment) Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  19. 3) Protocol • Refers to the process the school follows for providing students support. • Outlines “Who gets what when? • Standard Protocol: • Same for all (e.g., 45 minutes phonics) • Problem Solving: • Individually designed intervention • Combined Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  20. 4) Evidence-based Instruction • Empirically supported effectiveness • High rates of opportunities to respond, high engagement, good pacing • Corrective and immediate feedback • Differentiated instruction • Explicit instruction on big ideas within that subject • Programs with demonstrated effectiveness • Good “Academic Learning Time” Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  21. 5) Ongoing Professional Development • Staff understands the how and why behind RTI. • Ongoing, in small increments, with follow-up and feedback on use of new skills Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  22. Response to Intervention Ongoing Professional Development Tiers ofInstruction Protocol AssessmentSystem EffectivePractices Proactive, Preventative Instructional Match Problem Solving Focused Data-based Decisions Schoolwide Approach

  23. A Case Study • Lemmon Valley Elementary School • Reno, NV • 700+ students in K-6 • In year 4 of not making AYP • Principal, Vice principal, counselor, psych, 2 Special Ed teachers, 3 ESL, 2 SLPs, Autism classroom, Life skills classroom Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  24. Features of RTI • Tiers of Instructional Support • Assessment System • Protocol • Effective Practices (Evidence-based Instruction) • Ongoing Professional Development Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  25. Lemmon Valley Elementary: Intervention Assistance Team • Manages implementation of RTI and Tier 3 cases • Administrator, grade-level reps, counselor, psychologist, instructional coach • Time keeper • Content expert (instruction, reading) • RTI expert • Assessment/data expert • Facilitator/Leadership Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  26. Lemmon Valley Elementary 1) Tiers of Instructional Support Universal Level/Tier I: 90 minute block for reading using Houghton Mifflin; 60 minute math block using Everyday Math Secondary Level/Tier II: 45 minute block, 5 days/week. (3 days reading, 2 days math) Tertiary Level/Tier III: Typically replaces Tier 2 time. Includes individualized plan. Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  27. Lemmon Valley Elementary • 2) Assessment System • Screeners: CBM probes in reading and math (AIMSweb) • Diagnostics: IRI, QSI, Accuracy and rate on R-CBM, District benchmark tests, end of unit tests from core program, Curriculum-Based Evaluation • Formatives: CBM in reading and math, District benchmarks Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  28. Lemmon Valley Elementary • 3) Protocol • Combination of standard treatment protocol and problem-solving protocol • Tier 2 = standard treatment • Tier 3 = problem-solving protocol Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  29. Lemmon Valley Elementary: Tier 2

  30. Tier 2 (cont) Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  31. Tier 2 (cont) Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  32. Tier 3 placement • PLCs refer to IAT • If placed, student begins Tier 3 immediately (each grade-level has a teacher designated to teach Tier 3) • Problem-solving assessment conducted (RIOT/ICEL) and “Planning Meeting” is held to design the student’s Tier 3 plan. Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  33. Tier 3 Referral Questions

  34. Solutions Planning Sheet for Tier 3 Sheet

  35. Tier 3 Example • 3rd grader, reading mid 1st grade • Core time with differentiated instruction, small-group focusing on vocabulary • 45 minutes/5 days/week with Horizons • Reading with parent using leveled readers, 3 times/week at home (20 minutes) with daily log • High school reading buddy previewing story from lesson in morning Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  36. Logistics • Who “manages” students? • When/who provides Tier 2 interventions? • How is movement between tiers decided? • IAT agenda Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  37. Management of students • Tier 1 = Classroom teachers • Tier 2 = PLCs • Tier 3 = IAT • Special Education = IAT/Special Ed team Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  38. N = 19 (11/6/3) N = 17 (13/3/1) N = 7 N = 18 N = 5 57 Students 3 Reg Ed Teachers1 Special Ed Teacher1 ESL Teacher N = 7 N = 21 (15/4/2) N = 20

  39. Movement between Tiers Into Tier 3: 720 mins of intervention time, 8 data points indicating below-goal growth; IAT decision Into Tier 2 from Tier 3: IAT decision based on student’s growth and performance Into Tier 2: 3 sources of below grade-level performance; PLC decision Into Tier 1 from Tier 2: 3 consecutive data points above goal or 2-3 sources documenting grade-level performance Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  40. IAT Agenda • Set monthly agenda topics Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  41. Features of PBS Harlacher & Mucha, 2010

  42. Tier 1 Phase 1: Focuses on school wide PBIS. (General settings to classroom settings.)

  43. 4 Components of PBIS

  44. Establish Expectations • Define what is needed for students and staff to be successful socially • Develop looks and sounds like matrix with all common (non classroom settings) well defined • Consensus must be gained prior to implementation

  45. Expectations

  46. Don’t Be Miss Mutner

More Related