1 / 9

UNDAF Independent Evaluation

UNDAF Independent Evaluation. Overview. Proposed overview. Timing – close to penultimate year of UNDAF, doubling as outcome report. Collaborative exercise Government/UN Stakeholder consultations Independent consultant/evaluation team requir ed Process: Inception Data c ollection

eldora
Télécharger la présentation

UNDAF Independent Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UNDAF Independent Evaluation Overview

  2. Proposed overview • Timing – close to penultimate year of UNDAF, doubling as outcome report. • Collaborative exercise Government/UN • Stakeholder consultations • Independent consultant/evaluation team required • Process: • Inception • Data collection • Stakeholder participation • First draft • Validation • Final report • Timeframe – 2 months

  3. Focus and scope • Five UNDAF outcomes • Economic Growth and Sustainable Development • Health and Education • Gender • Governance • Social Protection • Cross Cutting issues: Gender, Youth, Aid Effectiveness, Climate Change, Human Rights • Core principles (global): HRBA, Gender, capacity development, environmental sustainability

  4. Purposeand objectives Purpose • What has worked, what has not, why? • Greater accountability of the UNCT to UNDAF stakeholders Objectives • Assess the contribution made by the UNCT • Identify factors that have affected the UNCT’s contribution • Provide actionable recommendations for improving contribution – informing next UNDAF

  5. Evaluation criteria Contribution of the UNCT to development outcomes will be assessed for: • Relevance • Consistent with country needs • Effectiveness • Results against outcomes of UNDAF • Efficiency • Achievement with appropriate resources • Sustainability • Benefits to continue The Evaluators will identify factors that contributed to performance – lessons learned, good practice for future planning

  6. Evaluation report structure • Chapter 1 – Introduction – objectives, scope, methodology, limitations • Chapter 2 – National development context • Chapter 3 – Evaluation findings – per UNDAF outcome analysed by evaluation criteria • Chapter 4 – Evaluation findings – UNDAF implementation arrangement and monitoring mechanisms • Chapter 5 – conclusions and recommendations

  7. UNDAF Evaluation audiences • UNCT (including non resident agencies) • Host government, key government counterparts • Civil society • Executive boards • Bilateral, multilateral donors in programme country

  8. Evaluation management structure • UNDAF Evaluation Steering committee (UNCT, national counterparts, civil society, donor reps) • Decision making organ of the evaluation • Approval all deliverables • Supported by the Office of the UN Resident Coordinator (RCO), advice from UNEG in Bangkok • Day to day support of the contract • UNDAF Evaluation Management Group (5pax) (RCO/M&E/Govt) • Direct supervision of process, finalise management response, maintenance of independence • UNDAF Evaluators – consultants

  9. Timeframe and resources • UNDAF 2011-2015 results matrix, M&E framework, Annual monitoring reports, UNDAF Info Cambodia • Cost – consultant, operational costs of process

More Related