1 / 16

JRA3 B. Guillerminet on behalf of the JRA3 project 22 January 2008

JRA3 B. Guillerminet on behalf of the JRA3 project 22 January 2008. Kick-Off Meeting 21-24 January 2008 Goteborg (Sweden). Outline. Participants Objectives of JRA3 Portal Jobs launching Data access Codes orchestration Visualization Service administration

elgin
Télécharger la présentation

JRA3 B. Guillerminet on behalf of the JRA3 project 22 January 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. JRA3 • B. Guillerminet • on behalf of the JRA3 project • 22 January 2008 Kick-Off Meeting 21-24 January 2008 Goteborg (Sweden)

  2. Outline • Participants • Objectives of JRA3 • Portal • Jobs launching • Data access • Codes orchestration • Visualization • Service administration • Connections with the others activities • Plans • Road map • Risks assessment

  3. WHO • Participants: • PNSC: 24 months (N Meyer, M Owsiak, B Palak, M Ptocennik) • UEDIN: 8 months (L Smith, J Hein) • Chalmers: 4 months (P Strand, T Svedberg, D Nilsson) • IPP: 8 months (D Coster) • CEA: 16 months (M Airaj, B Guillerminet) • ULP: 8 months (E Sonnendrucker, R David, P Navarro) • Structure • JRA3 leader & coordinator of JRA3/JRA4: B Guillerminet (CEA)

  4. Objectives • What

  5. Objective: Portal • Requirements: • single access point (based on ROAM, Shibboleth, SAFE …?) • access to applications (based on Migrating Desktop): • Data (codes & simulations) mining tool (catalogues + database) • Simulation parameters editor (Java based) • KEPLER: workflow (Java based) • Post-processing tools (SCILAB, VISIT …) • user queries • Accounting, monitoring • Tasks: • Specify & realize the Web portal • Integrate our applications in the portal • Who? • PNSC (24 months) • UEDIN (8 months) • Chalmers (?) • IPP (?) • CEA & ULP participate to the integration & tests of the applications

  6. Job transfer via FTP Data transfer via FTP Job scheduling via JCL Proxy Objective: Jobs launching • Requirements: • Complex workflows: loops, various directors, sequential & parallel execution • Long duration simulations: jobs could be launched at each time step (batch) and some must be kept alive (call + notification: interactive jobs) • Need a Java API for EGEE (gLite based) & HPC (UNICORE 6): temporary certificate, job submission, get job status, get job output + message oriented middleware (call + notification) • Integration in the workflow engine (Kepler) • Status: • EGEE: Globus version (already in Kepler) • gLite: in progress • Migrating Desktop as a “gateway” between Kepler and GRID/HPC infrastructure • Needs: • Access to EGEE (gLite + VO fusion) & HPC (unicore 6) infrastructures • Support + investigation for the non-batch part (interactive jobs?) • Who? • CEA (6 months / 16) • PNSC

  7. Objective: Data access • Requirements: • Access to external data (EGEE/HPC): open, get, put … a data structure (allocatable array) • Fast access: in-memory data during the simulation (avoid memory to file + file transfer + …) • Integration in the UAL (Many languages implementation: C/C++, F90, Java, …) • Must be defined clearly: connection with SA3 for SAFE • Needs: • Access to EGEE (gLite + VO fusion) & HPC (unicore 6) infrastructures: SA1 & SA2 • Investigation with the biomedical & astronomy projects (EuroVO_AIDA.pdf @ 4th …) • Support: SA3 • Who? • CEA (4 months / 16) • Chalmers (?) • IPP (?)

  8. Objective: Codes orchestration • Requirements: • Codes launching (EGEE/HPC) and coupling from the workflow engine: use the previously provided libraries • Distributed workflow: part of the workflow will run on the gateway, on EGEE and on HPC • Integration of codes: JRA1, JRA2 deliverables • Building a workflow based on ITM & JRA1/2 codes • Needs: • Investigation of various workflow engines: Gridway, … => collaboration or support • Collaboration with UCSD (Kepler team): designing tool for distributed workflows • Who? • CEA (6 months / 16) • IPP : building the workflow?

  9. Objective: Visualization • Tasks: • Integrate the new visualization tools (based on VTK, Visit) in the code platform: • Developments of specific actors • Used in a workflow (during the simulation) • As post-processing tool • Integration of the compression algorithm (deliverable from JRA4)? actor or as a library • Needs: • Collaboration with JRA4: deliverable, training … • Who? • CEA (<1 months / 16) • ULP (?)

  10. Objective: Service administration • Requirements: • Deliverable from SA3: • User administration • Resource management • Accounting • Reporting • Tool based on SAFE (UEDIN) • Task • Integration in the portal • Needs • Training on SAFE and support from SA3 • Who? • PNSC (24 months) • UEDIN (8 months)

  11. Connection with the others activities • NA1, NA2, NA3 • Management: bi-weekly, f2f (3 months), GA (1 year) • Training on GRID, HPC, SAFE, Migrating Desktop • Dissemination • SA1, SA2, SA3 • Login & CPU time to develop & test our software • Help • Implementation of the service administration facilities

  12. Connection with the others activities • JRA1, JRA2 • JRA1, JRA2 provide several codes • Execution using the API • Needs for orchestration • Data access (ITM data structure)? • JRA4 • JRA3 provides Kepler + tools • Development of actors and integration of VTK, Visit, … • Actor for data compression

  13. 2008 2009 2010 Plans 2008 • Road map • Work is mainly in 2008 & 2009 2008

  14. Plans 2008 • Deliverables 2008

  15. Plans 2008 • Risks assessment • Jobs launching: • only the batch mode is available => simulations will be less efficient • Data access • No external data => could use file transfer (GridFTP …) => hidden to the user • Orchestration • No way to run a part of Kepler on the GRID/HPC => use Gridway and build a tool to convert the Kepler workflow to Gridway 2008

  16. Work methods • Define precisely the work plan (JRA3 parallel session) • Email as a communication tool • Additional collaborative tools (Savannah, Wiki …)? • Meetings: PSG (2 weeks) + F2F (3 months) => rely on NA1 management • Mobility?

More Related