330 likes | 458 Vues
Join us for an insightful discussion on consultant plans at the 2007 Highways & Engineering Conference. Led by industry experts, including Tom Martin, Tim Conway, Miki Lloyd, and others, this session will clarify communication lines and provide guidance on consultant project management. We will cover essential topics such as handling lack of information, construction engineering contracts, and procedures for addressing errors and omissions. This interactive session will feature goals, objectives, examples, and a Q&A. Don't miss this chance to enhance your understanding of engineering project processes!
E N D
2007 Highways & Engineering Conference Questions on Consultant Plans
Welcome • Tom Martin - Consultant Design Engineer • Tim Conway – Consultant Plans Engineer • Miki Lloyd – Consultant Project Engineer • Mark Cyr – EPM, Missoula District • Jim Mitchell – EPM, Missoula District • Kevin Christensen – Construction Engineer • Paul Jagoda - Construction Engineering Services Engineer
What to expect • Goals & Objectives • Background • Avenues and Procedures • Examples • Q&A
Goals & Objectives • Goal • Objectives • Clarify lines of communication • Offer guidance
Background • Original PE contract • Let & Award Project • CE Amendment • Today
Lack of Information • Definition • Error/Omission? • Billable? • Example
Procedure: Lack of Information • EPM: Phone or email Consultant • Email cc to MDT Consultant Project Engineer (MDT-CPE) • Inform being considered “Lack of Information” • State the request/question • Identify required timeframe • Consultant: Respond via phone or email • Keep MDT-CPE informed via email
Construction Engineering Contract – Regular CE Tasks • Definition • Error/Omission? • Billable? • Example
Procedure: Construction Engineering Contract - Regular CE Tasks • District: DA or designee request CE contract amendment to MDT-CPE • MDT-CPE: Execute CE contract amendment • EPM: Phone or email • Email cc to MDT Consultant Project Engineer (MDT-CPE) • Inform being considered “Regular CE work” • State the request/question • Identify required timeframe • Primary point of contact; MDT-CPE advised • Consultant: Respond via phone or email • Keep MDT-CPE informed via email • Monitor budget
Construction Engineering Contract – Substantial Engineering Support
Construction Engineering Contract – Substantial Engineering Support • Definition • Error/Omission? • Billable? • Example
Procedure: Construction Engineering Contract – Substantial Engineering Support • District: DA or designee request CE contract amendment to MDT-CPE • MDT-CPE: Execute CE contract amendment • Consultant: Starts Substantial Engineering Support • MDT-CPE/EPM: Primary point of contact • Consultant: Respond via phone or email • Keep MDT-CPE informed via email • Monitor budget
Errors & Omissions • Definitions • Error • Omission • Corrective Action • Billable? • Example
Box 1 – Error Identification • Identification • Error/Omission • Protection
Box 2 – Notification • MDT Engineering Project Manager (EPM) • MDT Consultant Design Engineer • MDT Bridge Engineer • MDT Consultant Project Engineer (CPE) • Consultant • Contractual Obligation
Box 4 – Not Chargeable • EPM Corrective Action • Resources • Department Personnel • Consultant
Box 5 – Chargeable • EPM tracks time & costs • Charge Number 067 • CPE tracks time & notifies Consultant • Satisfies contractual obligation
Box 6 – Research Solution • EPM & Consultant • Assistance from CPE
Box 7 – Solution • EPM write Change Order
Box 8 – Documentation • EPM submits final costs to CPE • Within 60 days
Box 9 – Compilation • CPE compiles time & cost data • CPE determines justifiable costs
Box 10 – Resolution • CDE drafts letter to Consultant • Details costs • Requests payment • Within 30 days • Satisfies contractual obligation
Box 11 - Consultant Performance Evaluation • EPM • Other MDT employees