CONTEXT FOR ORGANIZATION THEORY. PUA 703-001 DR. SPRINGER FALL, 2007. KEY QUESTIONS TO ANSWER THEORY TO PRACTICE. . . WHAT DO I NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS ORG? HOW CAN I FIND OUT? HOW CAN I USE THE INFORMATION THAT I GET? MAKING CHOICES MAKING SENSE OF WHERE I AM
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
KEY QUESTIONS TO ANSWERTHEORY TO PRACTICE. . . • WHAT DO I NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS ORG? • HOW CAN I FIND OUT? • HOW CAN I USE THE INFORMATION THAT I GET? • MAKING CHOICES • MAKING SENSE OF WHERE I AM • WHAT KNOWLEDGE AND HOW TO APPLY
WHAT IS THE ROLE OF GOVT? • A NECESSARY EVIL? • TO SHOW THE WAY? • TO PROTECT, PRESERVE, PROMOTE? • TO MAKE IT WORK? • TO ENGAGE?
WHY STUDY FORMAL THEORIES? • USING THEORIES AS BENCHMARKS • QUESTIONS TO ANSWER • ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED • WHERE WE STAND • THOUGHTFUL RECONSTRUCTION OF HOW WE SEE THE WORLD AROUND US • EMPHACIZING AND DE-EMPHACIZING CERTAIN THINGS AND LEAVING SOME OUT • ROLE MODELS • REPRESENTATION OF REAL LIFE • MOLECULAR STRUCTURES VS MODEL CARS
BUILDING THEORIES • FROM • PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AS PART OF THE GOVERNMENTAL PROCESS • TO • PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS ARE THE SAME AS BUSINESS • TO • PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IS A PROFESSIONAL FIELD • USUALLY FOCUSING ON • COMPLEX ORGS. • CARRYING OUT GOVERNMENT MANDATES
BUILDING THEORIES OF PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS • PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AS PART OF GOVERNMENTAL PROCESS • GOVT IS LIKE BUSINESS RE: EFFICIENCY • PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AS A PROFESSION • COMPLEX ORGS • BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURES • AUTHORITY RELATIONSHIPS • PRINCIPAL-AGENT THEORY • PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AS GOVT ADMINISTRATION WITH AMBIGUOUS GOALS • SERVICE FIRST? • DEMOCRATIZATION OF ORG DETERMINES PUBLICNESS OF MGT PROCESSES
REDEFINING THE FIELD • PROCESS NOT STRUCTURE • CLARIFY EARLIER PERSPECTIVES • POLITICAL • ADMINISTRATIVE • PROFESSIONAL • PUBLIC NATURE NOT GOVT SYSTEMS • MANAGING CHANGE PROCESSES IN PURSUIT OF PUBLICLY DEFINED SOCIETAL VALUES
REDEFINING THE FIELD • BRINGING TWO PERSPECTIVES TOGETHER • DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL THEORY • FREEDOM, JUSTICE AND EQUALITY • ORG. THEORIES • MANAGING CHANGE IN PURSUIT OF PUBLICLY DEFINED VALUES • CRITICAL ROLE OF PUBLIC MGR • INTERPERSONAL AND STRUCTURAL RELATIONSHIPS AND CHANGE • DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIETAL VALUES • DEFINING ETHICAL BASIS FOR PUBLIC MGT
WHY STUDY FORMAL THEORIES? • PROVIDE A BENCHMARK • MORE COHERENT AND INTEGRATED UNDERSTANDING • MORE THAN SIMPLE OBSERVATION –CONTEXT • MODELS AS A REP. OR REAL LIFE • LIKE MODEL CARS • LANGUAGE • SAID, UNSAID, SAID NEXT
INSIDE FORCES ON A PUBLIC AGENCY MANAGER MORALE EMPLOYEE/UNION DEMANDS AGENCY HEAD OR MANAGER AGENCY HEAD OR MANAGER BUDGET CONSTRAINTS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS. DEMANDS OF UNITS NEED TO MAINTAIN OR INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY
TWO CASES: EFFICIENCY VS. EFFECTIVENESS? • KEN WELCH AS AN INTERN STUDIES THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS AND GETS TO KNOW RICK, TIM AND THE DIRECTOR • WHAT MOTIVATES EACH? • HOW DID HE COME TO UNDERSTAND THE BUREAUCRACY? • WHAT COMMUNICATION PATTERNS? • WHAT ROLE ACQUISITION OF KNOWLEDGE? • HOW TO COPE WITH OR DIRECT ORG CHANGE?
TWO CASES: EFFICIENCY VS. EFFECTIVENESS? • JOHN AND CAROL TAKE OVER A NEW HOUSING-LOAN PROGRAM AND DISAGREE ON APPLICATION PROCESSING • CUT RED TAPE OR EDUCATE? • HOW DOES WHERE THEY SIT DEFINE WHERE THEY STAND?
THE POLITICAL & CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY & IT’S ADMINISTRATION • WHAT IS PUBLIC POLICY • Public Policymaking in a Republic • Executive Powers • The Restricted View • Wm. Taft and Strict Constructionism • The Prerogative Theory • John Locke and Executive Privilege • The Stewardship Theory • T. Roosevelt and Actions in the Public Interest
THE POLITICAL & CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY & ITS ADMINISTRATION • THE POLICY MAKING PROGRESS • Agenda Setting • Process of ideas bubbling up for consideration • Anthony Downs – Preproblem, Alarmed Discovery, Recognition, Decline of Public Interest, Post Problem Phase • Decision Making • Rational • Intelligence, Recommending, Prescribing, Invoking, Application, Appraisal, and Terminating Phases • Implementation – small decisions at the margin • Seven Reasons for Incrementalism • Evaluation • Feedback
RATIONAL ACCORDING TO HERMAN SIMON1958 • MAKING OPTIMAL CHOICES IN HIGHLY SPECIFIED ENVIRONMENT • IDENTIFYING ALTERNATIVES A GIVEN • CONSEQUENCES FOR EACH • CERTAINTY, RISK, AND UNCERTAINTY • DECISIONMAKER CAN RANK CHOICES BASED UPON CONSEQUENCES • GOOD SELECTION POSSIBLE • MINIMAX RISK=MAXIMUM BENEFIT AND MINIMUM CONSEQUENCE
THE POLITICAL & CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY & ITS ADMINISTRATION • POWER--THE EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVE • Pluralism • Assuming the shifting of power within a democracy • Group Theory • Madison – Federalist Paper #10 • Interest Groups Will Be Heard and Can Be Managed • Organizational Goals • Internal Power Relationships
A CHRONOLOGY • 400 B.C. SOCRATES – MGT IS AN ART UNTO ITSELF • 360 B.C. ARISTOTLE – CULTURAL CONTEXT • 1776 ADAM SMITH – OPTIMAL ORGANIZATION OF PIN FACTOR • 1813 ROBERT OWEN – EMPLOYEES ARE VITAL MACHINES • 1910 LOUIS BRANDEIS AND FREDERICK TAYLOR - SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT • 1922 MAX WEBER –BUREAUCRACY AS A STRUCTURE
A CHRONOLOGY • 1937 GULICK’S POSDCORB • 1940 MERTON AND THE DYSFUNCTIONS OF BUREAUCRACY • 1946 SIMON ATTACKS THE PRINCIPLES APPROACH • 1948 WALDO ATTACKS THE GOSPEL OF EFFICIENCY • 1949 SELNICK AND TVA’S COOPTATION • 1954 DRUCKER AND MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES • 1957 ARGYRIS AND THE CONFLICT BETWEEN PERSONALITY AND THE ORGANIZATION
A CHRONOLOGY • 1961 THOMPSON FINDS DYSFUNCTION DUE TO ABILITY VS AUTHORITY • 1962 PRESTHUS’ UPWARDMOBILES, INDIFFERENTS AND AMBIVALENTS • 1964 CROZIER – BUREAUCRACY AS AN ORGANIZATION THAT CANNOT LEARN FROM ERRORS • 1966 BENNIS PROCLAIMS DEATH TO BUREAUCRATIC INSTITUTIONS • 1968 HERZBERG – MOTIVATORS, SATISFIERS AND HYGIENE FACTORS • 1972 CLEVELAND – CONTINUOUS IMPROVISATION IS REQUIRED • 1976 MACCOBY AND THE GAMESMAN • 1981 PFEFFER – POWER IN ORGANIZATIONS
A CHRONOLOGY • 1983 ROSABETH MOSS KANTER AND THE CHANGEMASTER • 1988 ZUBOFF AND THE AGE OF THE SMART MACHINE • 1990 GAGLIARDI AND SYMBOLS AND ARTIFACTS • 1992 OSBORNE AND GAEBLER RE-INVENT GOVERNMENT • 1997 VIRTUAL ORGANIZATIONS AND BEYOND • 2000 SNOOK ANALYZES SYSTEMIC BREAKDOWN IN FRIENDLY FIRE • 2002 PERROW AND ORGANIZING AMERICA: WEALTH, POWER AND ORIGINS OFCORPORATE CAPITALISM
MOSES CREATES FIRST BUREAUCRACY • JETHRO – INSTEAD OF COUNSELING EVERYONE – TEACHING ORDINANCES AND LAWS SO THEY FIND THEIR OWN WAY USING BASIC PRINCIPLES • HAVING TO DEAL WITH ONLY THE HARD CHOICES
EIGHT DEFINITIONS OF ORGANIZATION • WEBER • OBEY ORDERS • WALDO • STRUCTURE OF INTER-RELATIONS • BARNARD • CONSCIOUSLY COORDINATED ACTIVITIES • SELZNICK • STRUCTURAL EXPRESSION OF RATIONAL ACTION
EIGHT DEFINITIONS OF ORGANIZATION • KATZ AND KAHN • ENERGETIC AND INTERDEPENDENT INPUTS-OUTPUTS • SILVERMAN • SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS WITH SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS AND LEGITIMACY • COHEN, MARCH, OLSEN • COLLECTION OF ISSUES LOOKING FOR RESOLUTION AND DECISION MAKERS LOOKING FOR WORK
BRINGING THEORIES INTO PERSPECTIVE • DOMINANT METAPHORS • PRIMARY UNITS OF ANALYSIS • RELATION OF INDIVIDUAL TO ORG. • MEANING OF RATIONALITY • PRIMARY VALUES EMBODIES IN THEORITICAL PERSPECTIVES • “GENERIC” NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR THEORIES???
THREE ARENAS OF PUBLIC ORGANIZATION • INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL • PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR ACTS AS AGENT • INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL • PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR HAS A PLACE IN THE ORGANIZATION • ORGANIZATION TO INDIVIDUAL • INTERACTIONS WITH INDIVIDUALS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE AND DISCRETION
BUREAUCRACY ACCORDING TO MAX WEBER • 1. FIXED AND OFFICIAL JURISDICTIONAL AREAS DEFINED BY REGULATIONS • 2. AUTHORITY AND SUPERVISION • 3. WRITTEN AND PRESERVED FILES • 4. EXPERT TRAINING IS ASSUMED • 5. OFFICIAL ACTIVITY DEMANDS AND RECEIVES FULL CAPACITY • 6. MANAGEMENT FOLLOWS STABLE, COMPLETE AND UNDERSTANDABLE RULES
POSTURE OF THE OFFICIALACCORDING TO WEBER • OFFICE HOLDING IS A VOCATION • SOCIAL ESTEEM • APPOINTED BY LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY • TENURE FOR LIFE • COMPENSATION AND PENSION • SET FOR A CAREER WITHIN HIERARCHY OF PUBLIC SERVICE
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY • THE ORGINS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT • The Continuing Influence of Ancient Rome • The Military Heritage of Public Administration • Comparing Military & Civilian Principles • The Principles Approach • The Cross-Fertilization of Military & Civilian Management
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY • WHAT IS ORGANIZATION THEORY? • Classical Organization Theory • Production related and economic goals • Systematic Organization • Division of Labor • People Act Rationally • Adam Smith and the Pin Factory • Laissez-faire capitalism
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY • THE ORGINS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT • Frederick W. Taylor • Time and Motion, Measuring Management • Worker Development • Worker Cooperation • Division of Work • Fayol’s General Theory of Management • Six Principles – technical, commercial, financial, security, accounting, management
FREDERICK TAYLORPRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC MGT.DECEMBER, 1916 • RESTRICTING WORKER OUTPUT HURTS THE WORKER • PRACTICE PRECEDES THEORY • GOODWILL IS CREATED AMONG WORKERS • WORKERS ASSUME NEW BURDENS VOLUNTARILY • THE SCIENCE OF SHOVELING AT BETHLEHEM STEEL • COSTS MONEY AND JUSTIFIES PROFIT • MR. BARTH INCREASING WORK 2-3 TIMES THROUGH ANALYSIS
FREDERICK TAYLORPRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC MGT.DECEMBER, 1916 • 1ST PRINCIPLE: LEARNING THE SCIENCE OF WORK BY STUDYING MOTION AND TIME ON THE JOB • 2ND PRINCIPLE – SELECT AND DEVELOP WORKMEN • 3RD PRINCIPLE – BRINGING SCIENCE TOGETHER WITH TRAINED WORKERS • 4TH PRINCIPLE – DIVIDING WORK BETWEEN WORKERS AND MGT.
FAYOL’S PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT • DIVISION OF WORK • AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY • DISCIPLINE • UNIT OF COMMAND • UNITY OF DIRECTION • SUBORDINATION OF INDIVIDUAL TO GENERAL INTEREST • REMUNERATION OF PERSONNEL • CENTRALIZATION
FAYOL’S PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT • CLEAR LINE OF AUTHORITY • ORDER • EUITY • STABILITY OF TENURE OF PERSONNEL • INITIATIVE • ESPRIT DE CORPS
POSDCORB AS AN ORGANIZING PHILOSPHY • PRIMARY ACTIVITIES OF THE EXECUTIVE • CONSEQUENCE: • EMPHACIZING MEANS OF ADMINISTRATION NOT PURPOSE • DICHOTOMY BETWEEN POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION • EFFICIENCY OF WORK IS IMPORTANT THRU DIVISION OF LABOR
FOUR BUREAUCRATIC POSTURESTOWARD A COMPOSITE APPROACH • APPROACH • FORM • SCOPE • COVERAGE • MOTIVE OR VALUES • ORIGINS • NET IMPACT ON PUBLIC INTEREST • NET IMPACT ON PERFORMANCE • WEBERIAN OR RESPONSIBLE • REPRESENTATIVE • PUBLIC SERVICE • PUBLIC CHOICE
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION-MAKING • DECISION MAKING: CHOICES • EFFICIENCY VS. EFFECTIVENESS • PRODUCTIVITY • WEBER – LEGAL/RATIONAL (INSTRUMENTAL) AUTHORITY • RIGHTS AND THE ADEQUACY OF PROCESS • PUBLIC WELFARE ADMINISTRATORS AND THEIR CLIENTS • REPRESENTATION AND CONTROL OF DISCRETION • ROLE OF MORAL OBLIGATION/CODES OF ETHICS
WHAT DOES PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DEAL WITH? • DECISIONS THAT • AFFECT PEOPLE’S LIVES • ARE MADE IN THE NAME OF THE PUBLIC • USE PUBLIC RESOURCES • TAME AND WICKED PROBLEMS • PERSONAL VS. ORGANIZATIONAL ACTION
FOUR QUESTIONS TO THINK ABOUT. . . • WHAT IS THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION FRAMEWORK? • WHAT ARE THE THEORIES THAT APPLY TO ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR? • HOW WOULD YOU DEFINE ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY? • COMPARE AND CONTRAST CLASSICAL AND NEOCLASSICAL APPROACHES TO ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
DONALD RUMSFELD AND PRISONER ABUSE AT ABU GHRAIB - 2004 • AS A TRUSTED OUTSIDER AND ADVISOR TO RUMSFELD • WHAT FACTORS BROUGHT THIS TO CRISIS? • TO WHOM AND FOR WHAT IS RUMSFELD MOST RESPONSIBLE? • WHAT STEPS TO TAKE TO ADDRESS AND RESOLVE THE CRISIS? • WHAT ARE THE LESSONS LEARNED?
MOVING FROM CLASSICAL ON. . . • INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION • EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS • ORGANIZATION BY DECISION SETS • ORGANIZATIONS AS PURPOSIVE ENTITIES • INTEGRATING INDIVIDUALS • ORGANIZING AS REVEALED SELF-INTEREST • ORGANIZING AS SOCIAL ACTION • OGANIZING AS DISCOVERED RATIONALITY
SUPERINTENDENT’S REPORT • 1856 – ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY SETTLED PRINCIPLES • DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES • POWER TO CARRY OUT • MEANS OF MEASUREMENT • PROMPT REPORT OF ERRORS SO CORRECTED • DAILY REPORTS, CHECKS AND BALANCES • ADOPTION OF SYSTEM TO ALLOW GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT TO DETECT AND CORRECT ERRORS IMMEDIATELY
THE ENGINEER AS AN ECONOMIST • SEPARATE FROM THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS • SHOP MANAGEMENT • ORG. , RESPONSIBILITY, REPORTS, SYSTEMS OF WORK, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT • SHOP ACCOUNTING • TIME, WAGES, COSTS, BOOKKEEPING, EXPENSES, RECORDS OF RESULTS AND PROFITS
Connexion au compte
Connectez-vous pour publier votre contenu sur SlideServe.