1 / 8

PingER performance to Bangladesh

PingER performance to Bangladesh. Prepared by Les Cottrell, SLAC for Prof. Hilda Cerdeira May 27, 2004. Partially funded by DOE/MICS Field Work Proposal on Internet End-to-end Performance Monitoring (IEPM), also supported by IUPAP. Methodology. Use ubiquitous ping

elina
Télécharger la présentation

PingER performance to Bangladesh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PingER performance to Bangladesh Prepared by Les Cottrell, SLAC for Prof. Hilda Cerdeira May 27, 2004 Partially funded by DOE/MICS Field Work Proposal on Internet End-to-end Performance Monitoring (IEPM), also supported by IUPAP

  2. Methodology • Use ubiquitous ping • Each 30 minutes from monitoring site to target : • 1 ping to prime caches • by default send11x100Byte pkts followed by 10x1000Byte pkts • Low network impact + no software to install / configure / maintain at remote sites + no passwords / accounts needed = good for developing sites / regions • Record loss & RTT, (+ reorders, duplicates) • Derive throughput, jitter, unreachability …

  3. Architecture • Hierarchical vs. full mesh WWW HTTP Ping SLAC Reports & Data Archive FNAL Archive ~35 Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Cache Monitoring Remote 1 monitor host remote host pair Remote Remote Remote ~550

  4. Regions Monitored • Recent added NIIT PK as monitoring site • White = no host monitored in country • Colors indicate regions • Also have affinity groups (VOs), e.g. AMPATH, Silk Road, CMS, XIWT and can select multiple groups Monitoring sites in ~ 35 countries

  5. Bangladesh RTT & Loss SLAC to www.ru.ac.bd Feb – May ‘04 RTT ms Loss

  6. Indian sub-continent Derived throughput = packet size/(RTT * sqrt(loss))

  7. World • Log scale so straight line shows exponential improvement • Indian sub-continent 7 years behind Europe • Falling behind

  8. More Information • Contact cottrell@slac.stanford.edu to request monitoring of a host/site in Bangladesh • Requirements for host being monitored • http://www.slac.stanford.edu/comp/net/wan-req.html • PingER • http://www-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/pinger/ • ICFA/SCIC Monitoring Report Jan 2004 • http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/icfa/icfa-net-paper-jan04/

More Related