1 / 8

Utrecht II: Personal reflections Chris A. Roe

Utrecht II: Personal reflections Chris A. Roe. How have things changed?. Shift away from dualistic orientation. Allows a rapprochement with establishment ‘science’ Counters concerns over ‘deviance’, ‘mysticism’, ‘pseudoscience’

eliza
Télécharger la présentation

Utrecht II: Personal reflections Chris A. Roe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Utrecht II: Personal reflections Chris A. Roe

  2. How have things changed? Shift away from dualistic orientation • Allows a rapprochement with establishment ‘science’ • Counters concerns over ‘deviance’, ‘mysticism’, ‘pseudoscience’ • Places psi effects in a context of recogniseable methods and procedures • Makes available to us terminology, constructs and models that may have some value in explaining observed patterns or suggesting hypotheses

  3. BUT • There is a real danger of inheriting semantic confusions, or misappropriating respectable terminology (or stretching its application to distortion point) • ‘States’ of Consciousness • also applies to ASCs of ganzfeld stimulation and meditation • ‘Consciousness’ of RNG and healing studies • intuitive or lay understanding, but what properties in common with more technical usages (qualia, intentionality)? Need for conceptual clarity • ‘Entanglement’ of various phenomena • Explanatory power? • if a metaphor, what properties of the subatomic system are found in the human systems? • what defence against the claim of appropriating credibility?

  4. What have we learned? • Convergence of evidence from separate lines of research, particularly with the adoption of new technology • Psi may largely be an unconscious process • Direct physiological measurements (DMILS, presentiment) • Behavioural indicators (time reversed effects) • Hidden psi tasks (PMIR) • global and field RNG effects, RSPK • Where psi is brought to awareness it is mediated by altered states • dream ESP, ganzfeld, meditation, hypnosis • But these features need to be understood as elements of interacting systems • The best predictors of spontaneous experience are personality and experiential variables that reflect an underlying factor pertaining to fluid access to nonconscious processes • the best predictor of lab ESP will be derived from these

  5. Why might replication be so difficult? • We have expectations about replicability that are not being fulfilled • Dualists propose it to be a property of the phenomenon • Physicists look for a physical explanation • Skeptics (and some meta-analysts) interpret as reduction of error • Statisticians point to effect size and study power • But as a psychologist I would note • Psi is a product of complex (and interacting) open systems and we don’t design studies to suit • Experimenter effects • Psi phenomena do not occur in a semantic vacuum Perhaps the question should be: ‘why do we get so much more replication than we deserve?’

  6. Our biggest challenge(s) • Ed’s paper raised some real concerns • Few replication attempts • Limited skills set within the field • “despite over 100 years of research…” • In my view these reflect two things • our overall numbers • fewer than 100 engaged full time in parapsychology • the kinds of funding we attract • few opportunities • competition encourages distinctiveness • small amounts encourage short termism • little scope for collaboration or coordination

  7. What do we need to do? • Increase our numbers • Grow our graduate numbers • an alternative view of the talent filter • encourage inter-disciplinarity so as to develop skill sets the field needs • Recruit from related disciplines • make our study designs understandable and attractive to peers in outside fields • Better coordinate our empirical activity • More emphasis on inter-laboratory collaborations • More systematic intra-laboratory programmes of research • more meaningful time scales (5-10 years) But the current climate is more promising than before and we can meet these challenges and look forward to the future with some confidence

  8. Thanks for your attention • Email address for correspondence: • Chris.Roe@Northampton.ac.uk

More Related