1 / 20

Honor 3 -3 Non-Toleration

Honor 3 -3 Non-Toleration. Review. How is FERPA Relevant to the Honor System? What Happens when a Company Honor Rep receives an accusation? Who assigns the Investigation Team? How many Honor Reps are on an Investigation Team?

elizabetha
Télécharger la présentation

Honor 3 -3 Non-Toleration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Honor 3 -3 • Non-Toleration

  2. Review • How is FERPA Relevant to the Honor System? • What Happens when a Company Honor Rep receives an accusation? • Who assigns the Investigation Team? • How many Honor Reps are on an Investigation Team? • How many days does an Investigation Team have to Complete an Investigation?

  3. Review • Who are the members of an Honor Court? • Who makes up the Trial Counsel? • Who may defend an accused cadet at an Honor Trial? • How many members of the Honor Court must vote Guilty for an accused cadet to be found guilty? • What happens to the evidence collected by the investigation team if a cadet is found Not Guilty?

  4. Review • What are the three options a cadet has if he is found guilty? • What are the three grounds for appeal? • What is an Honor Board of Review? • Who makes up an Honor Board of Review?

  5. Program Design Based on Character Development Model • Conceptual model establishes basis for goals and objectives • Corresponds to Institutional values and mission • Supports assessment efforts to determine effectiveness of instruction Practical Application within Career field Lead Practicing Ethical Leadership Believe Institutional Values & Professional Issues Adhere Citadel Rules & Policies (Honor Code) Know Time

  6. The Spirit of the Code • The Honor Code • A cadet does not lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those who do. The Code is not an all conclusive standard for personal honor; It’s a great start.

  7. The Spirit of the Code The Honor Code A cadet does not lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those who do. How does the Code ‘flesh out’? The Code is further explained and defined within the Honor Manual, providing the framework for the system.

  8. The Spirit of the Code The Honor Code A cadet does not lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those who do. What relationship does the Spirit of the Code have to the Code itself? The Spirit of the Code should change the way we live our lives, during and after our time at The Citadel. It is designed to train cadets to live honorably both on and off campus.

  9. Spirit of the Honor Code • Though the Honor Code serves as the minimal standard it also: • Embraces truthfulness in its aspects of cadet life – prohibits lying • Calls for complete fairness in human relations and personal endeavors – prohibits cheating • Requires respect for the person and property of others • - prohibits stealing • Demands a personal commitment to uphold the ethical standards of The Citadel – prohibits toleration of unethical acts Live by the Spirit of the Code and live “above the common level of life”

  10. Non-Toleration • Non-Toleration is the idea of being proactive in the Honor System to prevent Honor Violations from occurring • By Not tolerating some of the actions of your fellow cadets you can prevent them from ever stepping foot in an Honor Trial

  11. Non-Toleration • Remember to: • Complete assignments in a timely manner and encourage your roommate to do so as well. Procrastination is primary reason for cheating • Ask the proper question, do not let other cadets become the victim of an improper question • Be observant, don’t allow your peers to look at websites where you can download papers and the like • Fill out Rifle Sheets properly – don’t allow others to take the easy way out

  12. Case Study • Cadet H is a company clerk. As one of his duties, Cadet H consolidates on one form all of the information collected on Personal Appearance Report Forms during company inspections. Cadet H then takes this form to the Company Commander for his signature to make the report official. Having transcribed all of the information to one form, Cadet H adds his own name to the bottom of the form and awards himself five merits for Outstanding Personal Appearance. Cadet H had not been inspected by anyone. Upon reviewing the consolidated Personal Appearance Forms, the Company Commander notices Cadet H has been awarded an Outstanding Personal Appearance. Cadet H states that he had been told during his training that adding your own name was "one of the perks" of being a company clerk. The Company Commander notifies the Company Honor Representatives and Cadet H is charged with the Honor Violation of Lying.

  13. Case Study Review • Cadet H is found guilty of the Honor Violation of lying. When Cadet H brought the Consolidated Personal Appearance Form to the Company Commander, it was the basis for an official report. By placing his name on the report without having been inspected, Cadet H is making a false official statement.

  14. Case Study • A cadet turns in a book review for a graded assignment. Instructions on the syllabus state that any work that is not the cadet's own must be documented. The professor recognizes that part of the cadet's book review comes from the blurb on the book's dust jacket. Suspicious, she checks further and discovers that virtually all of the cadet's review consists of sentences and paragraphs pieced together from various sources. 92% of the words in the review are verbatim from other sources; the remaining 8% are the cadet's own words. • The cadet defended his actions by saying the words were not verbatim; he had switched a few and placed an extra "and" or two here and there, hence he had not plagiarized. • Is this an Honor Violation?

  15. Case Study Review • Yes, this is an honor violation. Para. 5b of the Honor Manual defines plagiarism as "… using someone else's words or ideas as your own without giving proper credit to the source." Submitting anyone's words as yours without quotation marks means the words are yours; the percentage (92%) does not matter. Words and work that is not yours must be properly cited.

  16. Case Study • Cadet X returns from general leave on a Friday night around 2300. He goes directly to the weekend duty junior’s room and informs him that he will not be in his room for all-in check. When the weekend duty junior asks Cadet X where he will be, he says that he will be in another company watching a DVD. Cadet X does go to another company and begins to watch a DVD, however he doesn’t stay for more than twenty minutes and leaves the battalion before the gates are closed. The weekend duty member, believing that Cadet X is still in the battalion, does not pull Cadet X AWOL. Has Cadet X committed an honor violation? • .

  17. Case Study Review • Yes, Cadet X told the weekend duty that he would be in the battalion for all ins so that the weekend duty would not pull Cadet X AWOL when he couldn’t find him.

  18. Are there any Questions?

  19. Honor Committee Website • Located at: http://citadel.edu/r3/honor/index.shtml • Or http://www.citadel.edu  Corps of Cadets  Honor at the Citadel

  20. Summary • Review from Honor 3-2 • The Spirit of the Code • Non-Toleration • Case Studies

More Related