1 / 36

Building Support for the Primary Prevention of Child Maltreatment

This article discusses the current situation in the Philippines regarding child maltreatment and the need for support in primary prevention. It highlights the challenges faced and recommends steps to develop effective prevention programs. The article also emphasizes the long-term effects of child maltreatment on health and social well-being.

ellis
Télécharger la présentation

Building Support for the Primary Prevention of Child Maltreatment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Building Support for the Primary Prevention of Child Maltreatment Bernadette J. Madrid, MD Head, Child Protection Unit University of the Philippines Manila and Executive Director Child Protection Network Foundation

  2. PHILIPPINE SITUATION • Population : more than 92 million • Annual population growth rate: 2.04 • Poverty incidence worsened: 24.4% (2003) to 26.7% (2006) • High income inequality compared to Asian neighbors • Off-track in meeting MDG targets for Poverty Education Maternal health Malnutrition

  3. PHILIPPINE SITUATION • Low spending on social protection programs 0.3% of GDP in 2007 to 0.8% in 2008 • Lack of policy & institutional coordination • Social protection has a narrow base of beneficiaries • Social protection programs are: numerous; with limited reach; inadequately funded; short-lived • High leakage rate

  4. Philippine National Budget Year 2008 • National budget: 2008 Education = 13.8% Social Welfare = 5.64% Health = 1.6% • The budget cannot cover for basic services Source: E-Net Philippines, 2008.

  5. Traditional Political Support • In the Philippines, education has the highest political support and still it is not enough. There are just so many deficiencies in education. • CSR of corporations and individual donors usually support education. • The Philippines is just preparing for public kindergarten and after ten years: K12.

  6. Support for Primary Prevention of Child Maltreatment • “It is unlikely that political leaders will support the level of resources needed to develop high-quality programs targeted at preventing child maltreatment , which will be seen as affecting only a small proportion of children. “ Michael Wald (2009) Preventing Maltreatment or Promoting Positive Dev’t- Where should a community focus its resources? In Dodge & Coleman (Ed), Preventing Child Maltreatment Community Approaches. New York: The Guilford Press.

  7. Stages of Building Support for the Primary Prevention of Child Maltreatment CPU Network & Department of Health in partnership with WHO

  8. Stages of Building Support for the Primary Prevention of Child Maltreatment CPU Network & Council for the Welfare of Children in partnership with WHO

  9. Objectives of the First National Meeting on Preventing Child Maltreatment • Recognize that child abuse and neglect is an important problem in the Philippines today and has life-long impact on risk behaviors and chronic disease. • Appreciate that child abuse and neglect is preventable and that there are prevention programs that have been shown to work.

  10. Objectives of the First National Meeting on Preventing Child Maltreatment • Understand the problems that have prevented programs from being adapted in a wider scale. 4. Take the steps necessary to come up with a national plan on the prevention of child abuse and neglect.

  11. Leaders and policy makers Health Social Welfare Education Academe Professional Societies International Org Congress Local government Legal Labor Media NGO’s PARTICIPANTSof the First National Meeting

  12. NEXT STEPS recommended by the First National Meeting: • Creation/Expansion of Inter-Agency Committee? • National Plan for Primary Prevention of Child Maltreatment (to include framework for coordination) • Integration of Prevention of Child Maltreatment in public health programs • Data Management • Evaluation Tool to measure effectiveness of the interventions

  13. What was obvious • The Department of Health did not really want to lead the process. • Child Maltreatment is seen as a social problem and as such the leadership should naturally be the Department of Social Welfare and Development.

  14. Long Term Effects of Child Maltreatment • Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) still have profound effect 50 years later • Transformed from psychosocial experience into organic disease, social malfunction and mental illness • ACEs are the main determinant of the health & social well-being of the nation.

  15. Results of the Metro Manila ACE Study Those who were sexually abused are: • 12 times more likely to engage in early sex; • 9 times more likely to have early pregnancy; • 5 times more likely to commit suicide. Ramiro, Madrid, Brown 2010 Child Abuse & Neglect 34: 842-845

  16. Results of the Metro Manila ACE Study Individuals who felt that they were not loved during childhood are: • Twice as likely to smoke, use illicit drugs, have early sex and multiple sex partners • 5 times more likely to commit suicide. Ramiro, Madrid, Brown 2010 Child Abuse & Neglect 34: 842-845

  17. Bronchitis/ emphysema Asthma Ischemic Heart Disease Hypertension Tuberculosis Skin problems UTI Liver problems GI problems- ulcers, constipation, indigestion Depression Strong graded response between number of ACEs & poor health Ramiro, Madrid, Brown 2010 Child Abuse & Neglect 34: 842-845

  18. Bernadette J. Madrid, MD Laurie Ramiro, PH.D. John Go, MD Juanita Basilio, MD Child Maltreatment Prevention in the Philippines: A country situation analysis Supported by WHO, 2009

  19. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 1. To do a national situation analysis on child maltreatment prevention using secondary data and stakeholder interviews; 2. To assess how municipalities and barangays implement their child maltreatment primary prevention program.

  20. Study Settings • The study had a national and local coverage. • Three barangays in the city of Manila, 3 in Quezon City and 3 in rural San Juan, Batangas.

  21. METHODOLOGY Aspects of prevention programs targeted: 1. Prevention readinessrefers to the knowledge, attitudes and attributions that policy makers and opinion leaders have about child maltreatment. Qualitatively assessed through structured conversations with key individuals and content analysis of official documents and reports. Quantitatively assessed using Community Readiness Model of Plested, et al. (2006).

  22. 2. Prevention resourcesare what actually exist by way of information and informationsystems; and resources of government and non-government agencies specifically tasked to prevent child maltreatment

  23. Community Readiness Model (Plested, Edwards, & Jumper-Thurman, 2006) • A model for community change that integrates a community’s culture, resources and level of readiness to more effectively address an issue. • Allows communities to define issues and strategies in their own context • Builds cooperation among organizations and individuals • Increases community capacity for prevention and intervention • Encourages and enhances community efforts

  24. 9. High Level of Community Ownership STAGES OF COMMUNITY READINESS 8. Confirmation / Expansion 7. Stabilization 6. Initiation 5. Preparation 4. Preplanning 3. Vague Awareness 2. Denial / Resistance 1. No Awareness

  25. Child Maltreatment Prevention in the Philippines: A country situation analysis (Madrid, Ramiro, et. al. 2009)

  26. Child Maltreatment Prevention in the Philippines: A country situation analysis (Madrid, Ramiro, et. al. 2009)

  27. Child Maltreatment Prevention in the Philippines: A country situation analysis (Madrid, Ramiro, et. al. 2009)

  28. Child Maltreatment Prevention in the Philippines: A country situation analysis (Madrid, Ramiro, et. al. 2009)

  29. Child Maltreatment Prevention in the Philippines: A country situation analysis (Madrid, Ramiro, et. al. 2009)

  30. Programs for the prevention of child maltreatment Most of the programs were established not specifically to prevent child maltreatment but to improve the health, education and social status of the child. The implementation is based on the “limited good principle”. No evaluation of program effectiveness (A.I.D.S.) Provisions for children are scattered across various departments, without any formal connections or consistent policy or practice. NGO’s and international organizations fill in the gaps.

  31. Child Maltreatment Prevention in the Philippines: A country situation analysis • Very few leaders except for those directly involved e.g. social welfare, health, know about the different laws involving children. • There is really no separate budget for children. • No updated data on child maltreatment. (Madrid, Ramiro, et. al. 2009)

  32. Level of Prevention Readiness

  33. Common Next Steps for the 3 areas involved in the study 1. Baseline survey on child maltreatment prevalence Quezon city – all forms of CAN San Juan – corporal punishment 2. Orientation and training of leaders of the community 3. Information dissemination to community members about child abuse and neglect and the programs of the city. 4. Plan for evaluation

  34. Way to Go • Formation of a coalition of government agencies and NGO’s that will steer the country’s direction towards prevention of child maltreatment • National Prevalence Study on Child Maltreatment • Invest on a primary prevention program that is population-based; has been shown to work and can generate political support: Parenting Program

  35. National Network to End Violence Against Children Government Agencies • Council for the Welfare of Children • Department of Social Welfare & Development • Department of Education • Department of Health • Department of Labor and Employment • Department of Interior and Local government • Philippine National Police Non-government Agencies • Child Protection Network • Parenting Foundation of the Philippines • Open Heart Foundation, Inc. • Lunduyan Foundation, Inc. • Asia-Pacific Regional NGO Representative to Follow-Up VAC Recommendations • National Council for Social Development • PLAN International, Inc. • Save the Children • ECPAT • UNICEF Manila

  36. Thank You!

More Related