1 / 21

Nikola Antlová, Jakub Burget, Veronika Hradilová 2011

International Commercial Arbitration Arbitrability and the Impact of Mitsubishi and Eco Swiss decision. Nikola Antlová, Jakub Burget, Veronika Hradilová 2011. Arbitrability - definition. Consists of : Arbitr(ation) Ability = ability to be arbitrated

ember
Télécharger la présentation

Nikola Antlová, Jakub Burget, Veronika Hradilová 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. InternationalCommercialArbitrationArbitrability and the Impact of Mitsubishi and Eco Swiss decision Nikola Antlová, Jakub Burget, Veronika Hradilová 2011

  2. Arbitrability - definition • Consists of : Arbitr(ation) Ability = ability to be arbitrated - whether the jurisdiction requirements of arbitration ale fullfilled

  3. Conditions of Arbitrability • 1) valid agreement of parties • 2) particular subject matter

  4. Types of Arbitrability • 1) Procedural, Substantive • 2) Subjective : • agreement of parties Objective : • particular state´s law

  5. Arbitrability - distinctions • Not sameconsideration • Differentfromstate to state • USA : • NY Convention • Broadermeaningofthis term • US courtshave had thepower to determineallquestionscontainingthearbitrability • the most importantissue : arbitrationclause

  6. MITSUBISHI V. SOLER CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, 473 U. S. 614 (1985) Petitioner-cross-respondent:MitsubishiMotorsCorporation (Mitsubishi). Japanesecorporationwhichmanufacturesautomobilesand CISA, Swisscompanywhollyowned by Crysler Respondent-cross-petitioner:SolerChrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (Soler), is a PuertoRicocorporationwithitsprincipalplaceof business in Pueblo Viejo, Guaynabo, PuertoRico.

  7. Agreenment On October 31, 1979, Solerenteredinto a Distributor Agreementwith CISA whichprovidedforthesale by SolerofMitsubishi-manufacturedvehicleswithin a designated area, including metropolitan San Juan. App. 18. On thesamedate, CISA, Soler, andMitsubishienteredinto a SalesProcedureAgreement (SalesAgreement) which, referring to the Distributor Agreement, providedforthedirectsaleofMitsubishiproducts to Solerandgovernedthetermsandconditionsof such sales

  8. Paragraph VI oftheSalesAgreement: Arbitration Alldisputes, controversiesordifferenceswhichmayarisebetween [Mitsubishi] and [Soler] outofor in relation to Articles I-B through V ofthisAgreementorforthebreachthereof, shallbefinallysettled by arbitration in Japan in accordancewiththerulesandregulationsofthe Japan CommercialArbitrationAssociation

  9. Dispute Soler run intoseriousdifficulties in meeting theexpectedsales volume i 1981 andrequestedthatMitsubishicancelseveralshipments. AboutthesametimeSolertryed to transshipandsalequantityofitsvehicles to US and Latin America. Mitsubishirefused to givepermissionfor such action

  10. Claims MitshubishiheldSolerresponsibleforcancelingshipments, andthereforeforbreachofagreenment SolerallegedthatMitsubishiand CISA had conspired to dividemarkets in restraintoftrade. Refused to permitSoler to sellvehicles to US andSouthAmerica in order to replacethem on market

  11. Whoshoulddecide? Solarsupporteditsclaims by (antitrust) Shermanact, thereforedemanded US court to decide Mitshubishidemandedarbitrationaccordingly to pragraph VI ofthesalesagreement

  12. U.S. Supremecourtdecision AmericanSafetydoctrineshouldbeapplied to domestictransactions TheexpansionofAmerican business andindustrywillhardlybeencouragedifweinsistthatalldisputesmustberesolvedunderourlawsand in ourcourt

  13. U.S. Supremecourtdecision Weconcludethatconcernsofinternationalcomity, respectforthecapacitiesofforeignandtransnationaltribunals, and sensitivity to theneedoftheinternationalcommercialsystemforpredictability in theresolutionofdisputesrequirethatweenforcetheparties' agreement, evenassumingthat a contraryresultwouldbeforthcoming in a domesticcontext.

  14. EcoSwiss China Time Ltd. Vs. BenettonInternational NV, No. C- 126/97 (June 1, 1999) - Benetton (a Netherlandscompany) concluded a licensingagreementwithEcoSwissand Bulova the agreement contained an arbitration clause; arbitrators would apply Netherlands law Benettomterminatedthelicense 3 yrsearly → disputearose the arbitrators made two awards (a preliminaryone, then a final one) - theapplicationofBenettonforannulmentofthearbitrationawards (awardswerecontrary topublic policy?)

  15. TheNetherlandsCodeof Civil Procedure: annulmentofthearbitrationawardifitiscontrary to public policy The Supreme Court of the Netherlandsreferedquestions to theCourtof Justice: theinterpretationofArticle 101 oftheTreaty ontheFunctioningoftheEuropean Union (ex Article 81 TEC): Article 101 oftheTreaty- a matterof public policy

  16. Result: 1) non-applicationormisapplicationofArticle 101 maygiverise to the public policydefence in enforcementproceedings 2) domesticruleswhichrestrictpossibilityforannulmentbecauseit has becomeres judicataare justified by basic principlesofthenationaljudicialsystem → theprinciplesofres judicataprevailedovertheprincipleoftheprimacyof EU law

  17. ECJ, summary: 1) „Where domestic rules of procedure require a national court to grant an application for annulment of an arbitration award where such an application is founded on failure to observe national rules of public policy, it must also grant such an application where it is founded on failure to comply with the prohibition laid down in Article 85 of the Treaty (now Article 81 EC). That provision constitutes a fundamental provision which is essential for the accomplishment of the tasks entrusted to the Community and, in particular, for the functioning of the internal market. Also, Community law requires that questions concerning the interpretation of the prohibition laid down in Article 85 should be open to examination by national courts when they are asked to determine the validity of an arbitration award and that it should be possible for those questions to be referred, if necessary, to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.“

  18. 2)„Community law does not require a national court to refrain from applying domestic rules of procedure according to which an interim arbitration award which is in the nature of a final award and in respect of which no application for annulment has been made within the prescribed time-limit acquires the force of res judicata and may no longer be called in question by a subsequent arbitration award, even if this is necessary in order to examine, in proceedings for annulment of a subsequent arbitration award, whether an agreement which the interim award held to be valid in law is nevertheless void under Article 85 of the Treaty (now Article 81 EC), where the time-limit prescribed does not render excessively difficult or virtually impossible the exercise of rights conferred by Community law.“

  19. Použitá literatura • MISTELIS,A.L., BREKOULAKIS,S.L. Arbitrability: InternationalandComparativePerspectives. KluwerLawInternational, 2009. 408s. ISBN 9789041127303 • FOUCHARD,P., GAILLARD,E., GOLDMAN,B. Internationalcommercialarbitration. KluwerLawInternational, 1999. 1280s. ISBN 9789041110251 • Internetová stránka dostupná na: http://www.gibsondunn.com/publications/Documents/Shore-DefiningArbitrability.pdf • Internetová stránka dostupná na: http://www.delawarelitigation.com/2010/10/articles/chancery-court-updates/procedural-arbitrability-compared-with-substantive-arbitrability-should-court-or-arbitrator-decide/ • Internetová stránka dostupná na: http://arbitration.uslegal.com/arbitration/arbitrability/ • Website:http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=473&invol=614

  20. Internetová stránka dostupná na: http://ct.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19960613_0000040.DCT.htm/qx Internetová stránka dostupná na: http://www.uchastings.edu/faculty-administration/faculty/armbruster/Eco%20Swiss%20Case.pdf Internetová stránka dostupná na: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:61997J0126:EN:HTML Internetová stránka dostupná na: http://www.wilmerhale.com/files/Publication/5c9f5f0d-c4dc-43c2-8fae-4dabb56c41cd/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/4e4e4bab-db82-4f71-8d1e-5089c9dd0748/Ratliff%202000_Part%201.pdf

  21. Internetová stránka dostupná na: http://www.sjberwin.com/Contents/Publications/pdf/49/090606043516.pdf Internetová stránka dostupná na: http://books.google.cz/books?id=6we-5dIahwkC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false Internetová stránka dostupná na: http://books.google.cz/books?id=b1OgnDQ2UnwC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

More Related