1 / 1

Understanding Maziness and Window Concepts in Research Reliability

This overview emphasizes the importance of "maziness" and "window" as frameworks for discussing reliability and unbiasedness in time-dependent research. It addresses critical aspects like study design, measurement quality, intervention strategies, and sampling validity, which are central to ensuring high-quality research. The piece questions the adequacy of "content reliability" as a supervisory criterion for quality studies and stresses the necessity of peer review focused on study design quality prior to data collection, underscoring that evaluation must occur before results are published.

emelda
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding Maziness and Window Concepts in Research Reliability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 'Maziness' and 'window' are useful concepts to illustrate (to our clients) the notions of reliability and unbiasedness when time-dependency is subject of study. • Study design, measurement quality, intervention strategy and validity of sampling procedures are the recurrent key issues in every study, data-analysis comes later on. • Is ‘content reliability’ a strong enough concept to serve as a supervising criterion in strategies that warrant studies of high quality? Is it evaluable? Quantifiable? Unprejudiced? • The peer review should assess the design quality of the study as laid down in the study protocol before the study sets off, not afterwards if the results are offered for publication. It's too late then.

More Related