1 / 17

JISC Creative Commons study: interim review

JISC Creative Commons study: interim review. Hugh Look Senior Consultant Rightscom Ltd. Creative Commons and…. Throughout this talk, “Creative Commons” also means: Creative Archive AESharenet Science Commons …and other related initiatives following the same principles

emerson-sloan
Télécharger la présentation

JISC Creative Commons study: interim review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JISC Creative Commons study: interim review Hugh Look Senior Consultant Rightscom Ltd

  2. Creative Commons and… • Throughout this talk, “Creative Commons” also means: • Creative Archive • AESharenet • Science Commons • …and other related initiatives following the same principles • Also allows for local licences aimed at wide distribution with minimal constraints • Rather than controlled distribution

  3. Creative Commons itself is changing • Recent developments include • “Freedoms License Chooser” • Allows licensors to add additional metadata including links to other terms

  4. The project: objectives • Report on the usage, benefits and drawbacks of Creative Commons licensing • …and similar model licences • Identify opportunities for these and other model licences that JISC and institutions might use • To ensure optimum re-use of content created within or for the HE and FE communities • Consider… • Drivers • Barriers • Benefits • Risks • …created by such innovation

  5. The project: process • 5 case studies • Many interviews • Focus group of practitioners • Expert group including: • Legal experts • Policymakers • Academics • BBC • Open University • Other stakeholders – including authors, designers, publishers, activists • Scenarios: to identify how Creative Commons will work in “edge cases” • Discussed by Expert Group • Analysis, conclusions & recommendations

  6. Findings from case studies and interviews • Generally we found positive views on CC from the UK academic community • Creative Commons makes a powerful statement about sharing • Creative Commons seen as clarifying, simplifying and enabling • Enthusiastic support from minority • Re-use is major goal for several projects • But not uncontrolled re-use • Re-use opportunities are not yet widely exploited by users • Not a clear definition of what re-use is • Access for all users is an important motivator • Narrow and wide community benefits • Although Creative Commons licences are in use in the UK academic community, there is as yet little direct experience of their impact • Mainly a function of time - early days • Complicated by lack of experience with learning objects, VLEs & related technology

  7. Findings from case studies and interviews (2) • Liability for third-party content infringement is a major issue • Some projects do not believe that it is possible to proceed without indemnities • Some have succeeded in obtaining indemnities • Others have adopted a trust model • It may be possible to minimise risk of liability by having a different deposit licence from usage licence • Protection of other content (e.g. personal information) • Datasets: how does CC interact with database rights? • Perception that academics adopting CC “because it’s cool” • Identified by a number of projects and people interviewed • Not thinking through what they really want • Many not be aware of the implications • May not have read the actual licence terms

  8. Findings from case studies and interviews (3) • Differences in requirements for • Research outputs and resources • Learning and teaching resources • Perception that institutions have not thought through their policies • Little sign of enforcement by institution • Hard to identify senior-level ownership of these issues • Little interest from institutional policymakers/service providers (contracts officers etc) – most apparently unaware of the issues • Creative Commons is not always flexible enough to deal with new requirements • Machine interpretability not important at this stage • What would they have done instead?

  9. Other issues revealed in background research • Convergence with two public policy agendas • Increasing access to research outputs • Review of value of intellectual property’s relationship to public benefit • A reaction against complexity and lack of transparency in IPR • Response to lengthy negotiations in licensing • It can be hard to unlock the perceived connection between Creative Commons and Open Access • Highest levels of adoption may be among informal content creators – bloggers etc • Greatest problems may be in institution to institution licensing • Institution to individual less problematic • May be problems when resources are held in a service that needs authentication • Licensor & licensee can’t negotiate any aspects of a licence • Difficult to have Creative Commons where there is “universal deposit” (e.g. by students)

  10. Other issues revealed in background research (2) • Potentially confusing proliferation of licence terms may go counter the objectives of simplification and increased transparency and make it hard to licensors to choose appropriately • Creative Archive • Science Commons • Clinical Commons • Etc etc • In the UK, Creative Commons may be a contract • Would require a “consideration” to be valid in England & Wales • Not the case in Scotland • How to understand the law where the licence is made available? • Relationship between Creative Commons and DRM • Gathering information about usage is impossible • Tensions between commons production and commons licensing • What about database rights? • Much UK research output is data • What about moral rights?

  11. Some high-level issues

  12. Some high-level issues • Lines of discourse that don’t always meet up • The theoretical debate • “Should we do this?” • “What can we use this for?” • The pragmatic debate • “Is it safe to do this?” • “What are the limitations?” • Many of the proponents deal mainly in long-term benefits to society • Many of the less convinced see mainly pragmatic problems • Trade-off between flexibility and simplicity • Risk of creating large numbers of minor variants in order to meet local needs

  13. Creative Commons as an innovation • Innovations can have good or bad consequences • They have no inherent “virtues” or “vices” • Need to keep a close focus on drivers and impact • Study aims for analysis and objectivity • It is helping to form policy for JISC • Need to address long-term goals as well as short-term drivers & barriers • Sustaining or disruptive innovation? • All innovations can create powerful agendas • However well-thought-out or ill-thought-out

  14. What is the future for CC and similar licences? • Is CC better adapted to some forms of research output than it is to learning/teaching objects? • Which drivers/factors will have the most impact • On CC as a whole? • On its use in UK academic communities? • How to make the theoretical and practical streams of thought join up? • What are the alternatives?

  15. Thank you Hugh Look www.rightscom.com +44 (0)20 7620 4433

More Related