1 / 14

LHQ Status and Plan Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab

BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC. LHQ Status and Plan Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab. 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011. LHQ Task Leaders: Coil Fabrication + Instrum & Traces – J. Schmalzle (BNL), R. Bossert (FNAL) , … (LBNL)

emiko
Télécharger la présentation

LHQ Status and Plan Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC LHQ Status and PlanGiorgio AmbrosioFermilab 1stHiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011 LHQ Task Leaders: Coil Fabrication + Instrum & Traces – J. Schmalzle (BNL), R. Bossert (FNAL), … (LBNL) Mechanical Structure & Assembly – H. Felice (LBNL) • Test preparation and test – G. Chlachidize (FNAL)

  2. Magnet Development Chart Completed ~30% 85% Ongoing Starting

  3. Length Scale-up Projects in LARP SM  LR • From 0.3 m to 4 m • Started in 2005, competed in 2008 • Racetrack coils, shell based structure TQS  LQS • From 1 m to 4 m • Started in 2007, exp. completion 2012 • 90 mm aperture cos2q coils • Structure alignment HQ  LHQ • From 1 m to 4 m • Starting in 2011, exp. completion 2015 • 120 mm aperture cos2q coils • Full coil and structure alignment

  4. LHQ Features & Goals • LHQ is the main “Nb3Sn technology demonstrator” • For technology selection for the LHC IR upgrade • Deadline: 2015 • Aperture: 120 mm (as HQ) • Coil length: 3.4 m (as LQ) • Success criteria: • Nominal gradient = 80% of SSL based on extracted strands • HQ/LHQ Grad ~ 160/175 T/m (@ 4.2/1.9 K) • Quenches to nominal gradient: 3 • Quenches to 110% of nominal gradient: 10 • Quenches to nominal gradient after therm. cycle: 1 • Magnetic requirements from HL-LHC Design Study

  5. Conductor • Strand for LHQ01: • 0.778 mm • OST RRP 108/127 • Jc: > 2650 A/mm2 (4.2K 12T) • Jc: > 1400 A/mm2 (4.2K 15T) • Cu/non_Cu: 1.22 • Effective Filament size: ~52 um • Strand for LHQ02: • OST RRP 108/127, 144/169, 192/217 • Effective Filament size: ~52, ~44, ~38 um • Jc may go down with smaller filament size • The US CDP needs feedback now for this choice

  6. Cable and Insulation • Cable: • With 25 um stainless steel core • See “HQ cable development” by D. Dietderich • Insulation: • 0.1 mm per side • Braided S2 glass • Tests in progress with NEEW (optimization of thickness and coverage)

  7. Cross Section • LHQ X-Section = Revised HQ X-Section • thinner and less wide cable • thicker layer-layer insulation • 250 um  500 um • Task force for coil parts adjustments • Goal: more robust design • ES: replace saddles after heat treatment with insulation-covered saddles • ES: improve insulation around trace-leads solder joints

  8. Coil Fabrication Technology • Same coil fabrication technology of revised HQ • winding (Ti-Al-V pole parts) • curing of ceramic binder (CTD 1202) • potting (CTD 101K) • reaction (T = 210, 400, 6xx °C) • Last plateau temperature depends on strand type • Long coil features: • gaps among pole pieces (for longitudinal diff. CTE) • 4 mm/m as in latest HQ coils • Lifting and handling procedures used for LQ coils

  9. Supporting Structure • Supportingstructure: • X-section: LHQ = HQ • With holes for cooling (TBD) • Scale up-features similar to LQ • Segmented shell (4) • Al-collars, pads and yoke made of laminations • Masters and keys 2m long • Structure with more accelerator features under development in the HQ program

  10. Quench Protection • Analysis performed with QuenchPro and Roxie • Experimental data from HQ (1m) and LQ (4m) • LHQ can be protected by extracting some energy (R = 40 mW) and using LQ type heaters on coil ID and OD • T peak < 400 K (without quench back) • V max < 1000 V

  11. FNAL structural plate FOUR SUSPENSION RODS Test • Test at FNAL VMTF: • T = 4.6 – 2.3 K • no superfluid He with present top plate • support similar to HQ test at CERN • new He recovery line • new warm bore for magnetic measurements: • 63-68 mm ID

  12. Fabrication and Test Plan • Cable: • Cabling: LBNL • Insulation: NEEW (or other vendor) • Coils: • Winding & curing: FNAL • Reaction & potting: BNL, LBNL • Instrumentation: BNL, FNAL, LBNL • Shipment structure (long version of HQ one): BNL • Structure: • Pre-assembly & magnet assembly: LBNL • Shipment similar to LQ • Test: • Warm and cold measurements: FNAL

  13. LHQ Schedule | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 Practice coils Structure develop. & mech. model Coil test in mirror LHQ01 coils (5) LHQ01 assembly & test LHQ01b assembly & test LHQ02 coils (5), assembly & test 10 coils, 1 coil test, 3 magnet tests by the middle of 2015

  14. Conclusions • The LHQ is LARP’s last step for demonstrating Nb3Sn technology for the LHC Luminosity Upgrade • It builds upon the whole LARP R&D (HQ, LQ, …) with contributions from other programs • LHQ magnet test results are expected in 2014 - 15  For more Luminosity at the LHC

More Related