1 / 11

Paul Watkiss (for Tom Downing) 24 th October 2005 paul.watkiss@aeat.co.uk

Adaptation: Policy Perspectives. Paul Watkiss (for Tom Downing) 24 th October 2005 paul.watkiss@aeat.co.uk. Adaptation. Given historic/current emissions - already committed to climate change (~2C?) Policy debate starting to switch to adaptation

emilyrbaker
Télécharger la présentation

Paul Watkiss (for Tom Downing) 24 th October 2005 paul.watkiss@aeat.co.uk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adaptation: Policy Perspectives Paul Watkiss (for Tom Downing) 24th October 2005 paul.watkiss@aeat.co.uk

  2. Adaptation • Given historic/current emissions - already committed to climate change (~2C?) • Policy debate starting to switch to adaptation • Adaptation focuses on risks and opportunities to adapt to climate change • Action in the short, medium and longer-term • Institutional, structural, research

  3. Sectors – Key Impacts (€) = Key adaptation • Sea level rise • Agriculture* • Energy use • Human health (temperature and disease)* • Water resources, water supply and water quality* • Tourism* • Ecosystems (productivity and bio-diversity*) • Built environment / infrastructure* (extremes - flooding, storm) • Major events From Supporting Material (impacts and costs of climate change) for Communication on climate change http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/pdf/staff_work_paper_sec_2005_180_3.pdf

  4. Adaptation Policy Review • Review of adaptation policy • Review potential policy frameworks – does adaptation fit within a conventional decision making framework? • Review potential issues that likely to emerge in adaptation – and that need a policy perspective • What is successful adaptation?

  5. Adaptation Policy Progress • Starting to see emergence of adaptation policy frameworks and plans… • IPCC • UNDP/GEF Adaptation Policy Framework (APF) • FINADAPT • Canadian Climate Change • Australian Government - National Climate Change Adaptation Programme • UK CIP + UK Defra Adaptation Policy Framework (APF) • UK work considering objectives, targets, indicators • Most – scope impact, quantify risks, discuss decision making / action.

  6. Major Policy Challenges (1) • Uncertainty • Long time-frames • Different levels of certainty (projections, risks extremes, major events) • Dis-aggregration (high resolution needed for cost-effective adaptation) • Consideration of precautionary principle? • Irreversible losses (ecosystems) • Policy action and legislation (real adaptation) • Carried out at regional / local level by public / private sector. • Effective / appropriate adaptation “stakeholder-led”, rather than enforced

  7. Major Policy Challenges (2) • Allocating costs • Who should pay? Can we implement the polluter pays? • Cost-effective adaptation? • Climate proofing all human activities ? extremely expensive • Likely to see a focus on cost-effective and proportionate adaptation • Considering impact-assessment and CBA? • Only adapt where costs of adaptation are less than costs of climate change • Avoiding Mal-adaptation • Inefficient use of resources compared to other options • Ineffective (scenarios that not appear) • Displacing vulnerability from one actor to another

  8. Major Policy Challenges (3) • Option appraisal and cost analysis • Historical focus on policy focusing on technological options (and costs) • Adaptation needs to consider non-technical options more explicitly • impact assessment frameworks do not easily assess NT options • Economic, ethical and political issues • How discount long-term impacts CC vs costs of adaptation options now • How should adaptation consider equity and distributional benefits • Should we focus adaptation on protecting those less able to adapt (vs those with capital / resources) • Within countries, across Europe, Europe vs. developing countries

  9. Successful adaptation? • 1. Prepare to adapt by building capacity • Research • Awareness • Policies • Monitoring • 2. Alter existing plans to manage climate risks and take advantage of new opportunities • Urgent and high priority • Win-win, Low cost • Existing frameworks • Disaster responses • 3. Implement adaptation actions • Cost-effective/Cost benefit analysis • Additional criteria-existing frameworks • Modify infrastructure • Alter processes

  10. In Detail • 1. Define the overall (European) policy aim • 2. Determine priority sectors for adaptation action • 3. Characterise priority risks / opportunities (in each sector) • 3a. Identify potential adaptation options • 3b. Appraise adaptation options • 4. Propose adaptation objectives • 5. Define adaptation targets and indicators • 6. Link up policy framework at the EU, national and sectoral level • 7. Implement • 8. Monitor, Review and Revise

  11. Conclusions • Adaptation • Need to develop policy framework – • Address policy issues • Research on costs and benefits • Cost-effective and proportionate • Mainstream adaptation policy in a conventional decision-making and economic perspective • Tiered approach: prepare – plan - proceed

More Related