1 / 29

Water Quality Concerns in Ohio Waters

Water Quality Concerns in Ohio Waters. What has been Happening in Lake Erie?. Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems. Discussion. History of P in Lake Erie Key points making Lake Erie unique What happened on Lake Erie 2011 Agriculture in Lake Erie Basin

emmet
Télécharger la présentation

Water Quality Concerns in Ohio Waters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Water Quality Concerns in Ohio Waters What has been Happening in Lake Erie? Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems

  2. Discussion • History of P in Lake Erie • Key points making Lake Erie unique • What happened on Lake Erie 2011 • Agriculture in Lake Erie Basin • What is the Distressed Watersheds Designation • BMP’s

  3. Definitions • Total Phosphorous "Total" phosphorus is largely defined on the basis of how much phosphorus in its various forms will be oxidized into orthophosphate by a specific oxidant. • Water soluble P • Dissolved reactive phosphorous (DRP) • Bioavailable Phosphorous The soluble form of the nutrient phosphorus, which is readily available for use by plants. consist largely of the inorganic orthophosphate (PO4) form of phosphorus. • Particulate P Soil attached P

  4. A little history • 1969 total P loading was 29,000 metric tons • Harmful Algal Blooms (HAB) were concern and Lake had dead areas • Target was established of 11,000 metric tons • 2/3 of loading from point sources • 50% reduction in non-point

  5. Annual Loads of Total Phosphorus to Lake Erie, 1967-2007 Target load for total phosphorus of 11,000 metric tons set in ~1978 Source: Hiedelberg University

  6. Source: Hiedelberg University

  7. Renewed Concerns about Lake Erie and Nutrient Loading • Issue in 1960-1970’s was Total P Loading • Issue in 1990-2000’s is Bioavailable or Dissolved Reactive Phosphorous

  8. Interesting Lake Erie Facts

  9. Interesting Lake Erie Facts 50/2 Rule Superior 50% of water/2% of fish Erie 50% of fish/2% of water $10.7 billion economic activity while employing 119,100 Ohio residents and generating $750 million in tax dollars

  10. 8/11/11 Image Lake Erie

  11. July, 2011 Source:http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/res/Centers/HABS/graphics/wle_hab2_%20072211.jpg

  12. 10/09/11 Image Lake Erie

  13. Expected Time for Recovery Source: Dr . Jeff Ruetter, Ohio Sea Grant, The Ohio State University Because Lake Erie is the smallest of the Great Lakes by volume, the retention time for water in the Lake is very short compared to the other 4 lakes—Western Basin retention time is 20-50 days. Therefore, if reduced loading targets are reached, recovery will be almost immediate.

  14. Agriculture in Lake Erie Basin • 4.2 Million Acres Maumee Watershed • 4.9 Million Total • 59.1% cropland • 72% cropland in Western

  15. ODNR Distressed Watershed Rules Grand Lake St Marys • Shall follow eFOTG 633 standard • Not apply manure between 12/15 – 3/1 • Not surface apply on frozen ground or > 1” of snow (Injected or incorporated within 24hr) • No surface application when 50% chance of ppt. >0.5in for >24h Source: http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/portals/12/water/watershedprograms/GLSM/Watershed_in_Distres_FactSheet.pdf

  16. Recommendations to Reduce Nutrient Movement off -site The 4-R’s of Fertilizer material application. ‘Right’ Time ‘Right’ Place ‘Right’ Amount ‘Right’ Material Source: DRAFT document of the Ohio Director’s Working Group on Ag Nutrients 12/19/11

  17. Recommendations to Reduce Nutrient Movement off -site The ‘Right’ Time. Nutrients should not be applied to frozen or snow covered ground. Nutrients should be applied as close to crop utilization as possible. Source: DRAFT document of the Ohio Director’s Working Group on Ag Nutrients 12/19/11

  18. Fertility Applications Frozen and snow covered applications have the greatest risk of off site movement whether manure or commercial fertilizer

  19. Recommendations to Reduce Nutrient Movement off -site The ‘Right’ Place. Phosphorous applications should be injected or incorporated whenever possible. If surface applications are made, it should have a growing crop or cover as soon as possible. Source: DRAFT document of the Ohio Director’s Working Group on Ag Nutrients 12/19/11

  20. Rainfall simulator study, NW Ohio, Nov 2009 • P sources applied at 80 lb P2O5 per acre • Total P loss < 2% of amount applied • Rain @ 2.4”/hour; first 30 minutes runoff Mullen, 2011, unpublished

  21. Recommendations to Reduce Nutrient Movement off -site The ‘Right’ Amount. Good representative soil sample should be the basis for fertilizer application. Utilize Ohio State University Extension Agronomic Recommendations for nutrient application. Records should be kept for all soil tests, recommendations and applications as well as crop and resulting yields. Source: DRAFT document of the Ohio Director’s Working Group on Ag Nutrients 12/19/11

  22. Fertility Rates

  23. Recommendations to Reduce Nutrient Movement off -site In addition to the 4 R’s- Improve Soil Quality. Soil organic matter. Soil compaction. Water infiltration rates. Methods to reduce runoff. Source: DRAFT document of the Ohio Director’s Working Group on Ag Nutrients 12/19/11

  24. Recommendations to Reduce Nutrient Movement off-site In addition to the 4 R’s- Improve Water Management and Possible Treatment of Drainage Water. Repair broken subsurface drainage. Treating surface inlets runoff into subsurface drainage systems. Treating concentrated surface runoff areas. Controlled drainage. Constructed wetlands for treatment Improved designed filtered areas, biofilters Alternative drainage ditch designs Source: DRAFT document of the Ohio Director’s Working Group on Ag Nutrients 12/19/11

  25. Summary • Phosphorous is the focus. but not Total P but Dissolved Reactive P (DRP) • Agriculture has a role (not the only focus) and BMP’s can minimize impact Timing of application • 4 R’s of fertilizer application • Conservation practices • Rates based on Tri-state • Improve soil quality and crop yields

More Related