1 / 31

Welcome to Forensic Science

Welcome to Forensic Science. Mrs. Cannon Room 306 cannona@archbishopsplading.org. Warm-Up Question. What is forensic science?. What is forensic science?. The term forensics is derived from the Latin forensis meaning forum.

emmett
Télécharger la présentation

Welcome to Forensic Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Welcome to Forensic Science Mrs. Cannon Room 306 cannona@archbishopsplading.org

  2. Warm-Up Question What is forensic science?

  3. What is forensic science? • The term forensics is derived from the Latin forensis meaning forum. • Forensic science is application of science to matters of criminal and civil laws that are enforced by police agencies in the criminal justice system. • Criminalistics is the examination of physical evidence. Can be used interchangeably with forensics.

  4. History of the Development of Forensic Science • Due Date: • You will receive a topic or scientist that somehow contributed to the development of forensic science. • You are to research the topic and provide the following information to the class. • Create a small poster that describes your event or person. • It should include: • A detailed summary of the event or person describing their significance in the development of forensic science. • All work should be typed in a font large enough to read or neatly written • Heading or Title at the top of the poster • The date when the event took place under the heading. • At least one picture, photo or drawing. •  Please reference your source(s) on the back. • Your name and period on the back.

  5. “In school, every period ends with a bell. Every sentence ends with a period. Every crime ends with a sentence.” • —Stephen Wright, comedian

  6. Criminalistics the scientific examination of physical evidence for legal purposes. Criminology includes the psychological angle, studying the crime scene for motive, traits, and behavior that will help to interpret the evidence Criminalistics vs Criminology

  7. Crime Lab BASIC SERVICES • Evidence Collection Unit • Photography Unit • Evidence Storage

  8. Crime Lab—Optional Services ADDITIONAL SERVICES • Physical Science Unit • Trace Evidence • Firearms Identification • Document Examination • Fingerprint Examination • Toxicology Unit • Biology Unit • Autopsy • DNA Analysis • Serology • Polygraph Unit • Voiceprint Analysis Unit

  9. Other Forensic Science Services • Forensic Pathology • Forensic Anthropology • Forensic Entomology • Forensic Psychiatry • Forensic Odontology • Forensic Engineering • Cybertechnology

  10. Major Crime Laboratories • FBI • DEA • ATF • U.S. Postal Service • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

  11. Crime Lab History • First police crime lab in the world was established in France in 1910 by Edmond Locard • First police crime lab in the U.S. opened in 1923 in Los Angeles • The Scientific Crime Detection Lab was founded in Evanston, Illinois in 1929 • The first FBI crime lab opened in 1932

  12. BIG IDEA! • The development of modern forensic science parallels general advancements in science, particularly physical and biological sciences. • What milestones in science do you think pushed forensics forward?

  13. Major Developments in Forensic Science History • 700s AD—Chinese used fingerprints to establish identity of documents and clay sculptures • ~1000—Roman courts determined that bloody palm prints were used to frame a man in his brother’s murder • 1149—King Richard of England introduced the idea of the coroner to investigate questionable death • 1200s—A murder in China is solved when flies were attracted to invisible blood residue on a sword of a man in the community • 1598—Fidelus was first to practice forensic medicine in Italy • 1670—Anton Van Leeuwenhoek constructed the first high-powered microscope • 1776—Paul Revere identified the body of General Joseph Warren based on the false teeth he had made for him • 1784—John Toms convicted of murder on basis of torn edge of wad of paper in pistol matching a piece of paper in his pocket

  14. Major Developments in Forensic Science History • 1859—Gustav Kirchhoff and Robert Bunsen developed the science of spectroscopy. • 1864—Crime scene photography developed • 1879—Alphonse Bertillon developed a system to identify people using particular body measurements • 1896—Edward Henry developed first classification system for fingerprint identification • 1900—Karl Landsteiner identified human blood groups • 1904—Edmond Locard formulated his famous principle, “Every contact leaves a trace.” • 1922—Francis Aston developed the mass spectrometer. • 1959—James Watson and Francis Crick discover the DNA double helix • 1977—AFIS developed by FBI, fully automated in 1996 • 1984—Jeffreys developed and used first DNA tests to be applied to a criminal case

  15. People of Historical Significance Edmond Locard (1877-1966) • French professor • Considered the father of criminalistics • Built the world’s first forensic laboratory in France in 1910

  16. BIG IDEA! The basis for modern forensic science is the Locard Exchange Principle Whenever two objects come into contact with each other, traces of each are exchanged. Every contact you make with another person, place or object results in an exchange of physical materials.

  17. Locard Principle in Action • You have 2 children and a cat. You run out to take care of some errands that include stopping at a furniture store, the laundry, and the house of a friend who has one child and a dog. From a forensic standpoint, this sequence of events can provide a gold mine of information. What “traces” of you are left behind at each stop? What evidence of each stop do you take with you?

  18. Crime Scene Team • A group of professional investigators, each trained in a variety of special disciplines. • Team Members • First Police Officer on the scene • Medics (if necessary) • Investigator(s) • Medical Examiner or Representative (if necessary) • Photographer and/or Field Evidence Technician • Lab Experts pathologist serologist DNA expert toxicologist forensic odontologist forensic anthropologist forensic psychologist forensic entomologist firearm examiner bomb and arson expert document and handwriting experts fingerprint expert

  19. Scientific Method(as it pertains to criminalistics) • Observe a problem or questioned evidence and collect objective data. • Consider a hypothesis or possible solution. • Examine, test, and then analyze the evidence. • Determine the significance of the evidence. • Formulate a theory based on evaluation of the significance of the evidence

  20. Complex Reasoning Skills Necessary to Work Through and Solve Crimes: • Deductive and Inductive Reasoning • Classifying • Comparing and Contrasting • Problem Solving • Analyzing Perspectives • Constructing Support • Error Analysis

  21. Laws that Pertain to the U.S. Criminal Justice System • The U.S. Constitution • Statutory Law • Common Law or Case Law • Civil Law • Criminal Law • Equity Law • Administrative Law

  22. To be presumed innocent until proven guilty Not to be searched unreasonably Not to be arrested without probable cause Against unreasonable seizure of personal property Against self-incrimination To fair questioning by police To protection from physical harm throughout the justice process To an attorney To trial by jury To know any charges against oneself To cross-examine prosecution witnesses To speak and present witnesses Not to be tried again for the same crime Against cruel and unusual punishment To due process To a speedy trial Against excessive bail Against excessive fines To be treated the same as others, regardless of race, gender, religious preference, country of origin, and other personal attributes The Bill of RightsGives individuals the right:

  23. Miranda v Arizona • In 1963, Ernesto Miranda, a 23 year old mentally disturbed man, was accused of kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman in Phoenix, Arizona. He was brought in for questioning, and confessed to the crime. He was not told that he did not have to speak or that he could have a lawyer present. At trial, Miranda's lawyer tried to get the confession thrown out, but the motion was denied. The case went to the Supreme Court in 1966. The Court ruled that the statements made to the police could not be used as evidence, since Mr. Miranda had not been advised of his rights.

  24. Miranda Rights The following is a minimal Miranda warning: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at the government’s expense.

  25. Types of Crimes • Infraction • Misdemeanor • Felony

  26. Evidence Anything that tends to prove or disprove something.

  27. Must be relevant Relevance is made up of 2 components Materiality- must have something to do with the case being tried Ex. Previous activity unrelated to present case Probativeness- must prove or disprove something Must be competent Non-Prejudicial Ex. Can’t be inflammatory, prior criminal activity Constitutional constraints Ex. Unreasonable search and seizure Statutory constraints Ex. Incriminating testimonial evidence Hearsay Ex. Statement made outside of court not under oath asserting the truth of the statement Admissibility of Evidence

  28. Federal Rules of Evidence Govern what evidence is admissible in court Two legal decisions had the biggest impact on the field of forensic science. Frye v. United States 1923 Daubert v. Merrill Dow 1993

  29. 1923 Frye v. United States Scientific evidence is allowed into the courtroom if it is generally accepted by the relevant scientific community. The Frye standard does not offer any guidance on reliability. The evidence is presented in the trial and the jury decides if it can be used. Known as general acceptance standard. 1993 Daubert v. Dow Admissibility is determined by: Whether the theory or technique can be tested Whether the science has been offered for peer review Whether the rate of error is acceptable Whether the method at issue enjoys widespread acceptance. Whether the opinion is relevant to the issue The judge decides if the evidence can be entered into the trial. Admissibility of Evidence

  30. Facets of Guilt Try to prove: • Means—person had the ability to do the crime • Motive—person had a reason to do the crime(not necessary to prove in a court of law) • Opportunity—person can be placed at the crime

  31. “If the Law has made you a witness, remain a man (woman) of science. You have no victim to avenge, no guilty or innocent person to ruin or save. You must bear testimony within the limits of science.” —P.C.H. Brouardel

More Related