1 / 39

Support for Bibliometric /Portfolio Analysis from the NIH Library

Support for Bibliometric /Portfolio Analysis from the NIH Library. Terrie Wheeler, MLS Anne White-Olson, MLS Brigit Sullivan, MLS Tom Moskal, DVM May 3, 2013. Establishing linkages: using the literature to identify value. Using the literature to assess science requires:

emmy
Télécharger la présentation

Support for Bibliometric /Portfolio Analysis from the NIH Library

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Support for Bibliometric/Portfolio Analysis from the NIH Library Terrie Wheeler, MLS Anne White-Olson, MLS Brigit Sullivan, MLS Tom Moskal, DVM May 3, 2013

  2. Establishing linkages: using the literature to identify value Using the literature to assess science requires: • clear linkages from funding to papers to new science, and • clean data • meaningful metrics

  3. Concerns with standard publication metrics • Impact Factor • Average # of citations (within one year) received by all papers in a journal published within the subsequent 2 years • h-index • g-index • tapered h-index • a-index • etc. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:H-index-en.svg

  4. Percentile Ranking • Normalizes citation counts • Is not as affected by a skewed distribution • Provides information about publication impact • Is calculated fairly cleanly • Over time percentile ranking in a discipline is anticipated

  5. Percentiles for papers Percentile ranking chart from TR’s Essential Science Indicators, 200

  6. Using the literature to identify value • NIAID – impact on standards of care • NIMH – impact of extramural funding • CSR – seeking which study sections have funded most drug/device discoveries • NHLBI – papers from funded research over the last ten years

  7. NIDCD PIs and IC Collaborators • Who are the NIH PIs that the NIDCD scientists collaborate with? • How many publications have they authored during a specific time period (2007-2012) • Who is first author? Who is last author? What number author are they?

  8. How to approach this? • PubMed (few analytics) • Web of Science (analytics, but fewer bib records than PubMed) • BiomedExperts Elsevier • NIH IRP Website • NIDB • Reporter

  9. Capturing the Data • Web of Science: Author Search and Analyze Results/Author • Endnote: Each author was individual custom group • Excel: Each NIDCD author had spreadsheet, where listed all authors and counts of what number author s/he was • Exported Endnote to Word: Bibliographies for each author.

  10. Visual of Data

  11. Take Away • Dirty data and numbers vary per system • Different paths give different numbers. Pick one and use that consistently • No one system has all the answers • Value of Librarians: Know the systems, Know data, Ask a lot of questions, Use a lot of sources.

  12. Mapping Science Mapping Science Views of Earth at Night http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/NPP/news/earth-at-night.html Patterns of electric light on Earth seen from space at night show the digital divide between north and south. Patterns of electric light on Earth seen from space at night show the digital divide between north and south. (UNEP report)

  13. Portable Digital File format = .pdf NIDCD Data Set

  14. Scalable Vector Graphics format = .svg NIDCD Data Set

  15. NIDCD Data Set

  16. NIDCD Data Set

  17. NIDCD Data Set

  18. NIDCD Data Set

  19. NIDCD Data Set

  20. NIDCD Data Set

  21. NIDCD Data Set

  22. NIDCD Data Set

  23. NIDCD Data Set

  24. NIDCD Data Set

  25. NIDCD Data Set

  26. NIDCD Data Set

  27. NIDCD Data Set

  28. NIDCD Data Set

  29. NIDCD Data Set

  30. NIDCD Data Set

  31. NIDCD Data Set

  32. The NIAID question What is NIAID’s impact on society? How has NIAID’s work influenced standards of care? The Standard of Care Prevention and Control of Influenza with Vaccines Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2010 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report www.cdc.gov/mmwr

  33. How to Assess Impact • How many intramural NIAID authors are cited in the references at the end of this standard or care? • How many papers in the reference listing were funded with NIAID grant funds?

  34. Logistics • 552 citations in Scopus • 524 export • Lose 7 • Lose 69--not indexed in Medline • Scopus to EndNote to Medline to WOS to EndNote • Dynamics of dedupping • Select criteria carefully • Rerun with different criteria

  35. NIAID affiliation • Intramural • Extramural • Address field • Grants • UNIQUE 11 59 10 54 67

  36. Conclusion • Out of the 448 references* cited in the document Prevention and Control of Influenza with Vaccines Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization, NIAID is responsible for or affiliated with 67 or 15% *the document has 552 references but only 448 made it through the system without getting lost

  37. Who else is citing the NIAID papers?

  38. Can we predict future science with publication data? • Reliable metrics • Clean data • Establish linkages • funding • papers • new science • Evaluate trends

  39. For more information Terrie Wheeler National Institutes of Health Library terrie.wheeler@nih.gov 301.496.1157

More Related