1 / 16

Shifting Roles and Blurring Boundaries: Reconstructing Professional Identities in Higher Education

Shifting Roles and Blurring Boundaries: Reconstructing Professional Identities in Higher Education Dr Celia Whitchurch Lecturer in Higher Education Institute of Education, University of London c.whitchurch@ioe.ac.uk. Centre for Higher Education Studies. Contexts I.

ena
Télécharger la présentation

Shifting Roles and Blurring Boundaries: Reconstructing Professional Identities in Higher Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Shifting Roles and Blurring Boundaries: Reconstructing Professional Identities in Higher Education Dr Celia Whitchurch Lecturer in Higher Education Institute of Education, University of London c.whitchurch@ioe.ac.uk Centre for Higher Education Studies

  2. Contexts I • Study for LFHE on changing roles and identities of professional staff (www.lfhe.ac.uk/publications/research) • Literature on academic identity • Limited understandings about professional staff identities… • Focus on professional managers (as opposed to academic managers)

  3. Contexts II • Practitioner literature highlighted: • ‘Professionalisation’ eg accreditation; CPD; code of standards • Increased specialisation to deal with eg legislative, audit and market requirements • Neglect of: • Diversity and mobility of professional staff • Blurring of organisational/functional/professional boundaries • Emergence of partnership working • ‘Professionalisation’ process and greater fluidity happening simultaneously

  4. Conceptual framework(identity) • Conceptual framework of identity: • A reflexive process or project requiring the active participation of the individual • The way that individuals position themselves in relation to eg organisation charts/structures • Interpretation of positioning in relation to others • Therefore, an ongoing, open-ended process (rather than fixed core/belonging), plus • Possibility of multiple aspects or dimensions

  5. The study • 29 interviews in UK • Three institutions (multi-faculty, green-field campus, post-1992) • Middle and senior career professionals: • Generalists eg registry staff, departmental managers • Specialists eg finance, human resources • ‘Niche’ managers eg quality, widening participation, research management • Further interviews in Australia (one sandstone, one post-merger institution: 10 interviews) and US (two public institutions: 15 interviews)

  6. Key findings I • Professional identities more complex than implied by eg job descriptions/organisation charts • People distinguish themselves by the way that they operate around organisational boundaries

  7. Identity ‘Dispositions’

  8. Typology of identities

  9. Key findings II • Also found evidence that: • The boundary between professional and academic domains is becoming increasingly blurred • A ‘third space’ is emerging between the two

  10. The Emergence of ‘Third Space’ ‘Perimeter’ roles eg ‘Perimeter’ roles eg Academic Staff Professional Staff Examples of Institutional Projects Outreach/study skills Access/equity/ disability Community/ regional partnership The Student Transitions Project eg Life and welfare Widening participation Employability and careers The Partnership Project eg Regional/community development Regeneration Business/technology incubation The Professional Development Project eg Academic practice Professional practice Project management Leadership/management development Generalist functions (eg registry, department/ school management) Specialist functions (eg finance, human resources) ‘Niche’ functions (eg quality, research management Pastoral support Teaching/ curriculum development for non-traditional students Links with local education providers Teaching Research ‘Third leg’ eg public service, enterprise Multi-functional teams “The Higher Education Professional”

  11. Implications of Third Space I • Team working between: • people of different levels of seniority • different specialist and professional backgrounds • Authority built on personal basis, rather than solely via position in hierarchy or specialist knowledge: • “There’s no authority that you come with” • “It’s what you are, not what you represent” • “If you solve a problem for us, we’ll come back and work with you again”

  12. Implications of Third Space II • Ambiguous working conditions • “Sometimes an academic unit, sometimes an office” • Using this to advantage • Developing appropriate language • Assisted by eg: • Availability of ‘safe space’ in which to experiment • Support of senior figure or mentor (HOA, PVC) • Acquisition of academic credentials (master’s, doctorates)

  13. Implications of Third Space III • Diffusion of ‘management’ and ‘leadership’ • No longer ‘done’ by one sub-set of people to majority • Likely to involve: • Management/leadership skills at earlier stage of people’s careers • Bringing together local practice and formal frameworks • Being creative with existing mechanisms

  14. Challenges of Third Space • For individuals: • Status of boundary work? • How to gain credit for third space activity in appraisal/promotion processes? • Risks in getting out of ‘mainstream’? • Inappropriate reporting lines… • Networking vs formal relationships eg committee membership

  15. Challenges of Third Space • For institutions: • Sources of leverage can be diffuse • How to prevent eg projects developing a life of their own; or being too dependent on one individual • Encouraging creativity/innovation while maintaining oversight… • Lines of communication… • Appropriate mix/balance of identities

  16. The future? • Changing concepts of ‘professionalism’…? • ‘Millennial' generation expect: • Flexibility, creativity, lifestyles, locations • Less elitism • New locales for activity eg outreach • Portfolio careers • Networking • Sharing of good practice… • A genuine ‘community of professionals’? (See Richard Florida – The Rise of the Creative Class, 2002)

More Related