1 / 9

Influence of Conservation Experts on Sensor Development: Insights from Krakow Workshop

The Krakow workshop convened ten conservation experts from Europe to discuss the strategic and technical development of sensors for preventive conservation. Guided by facilitator Jonathan Ashley-Smith, participants explored the need for reliable, unobtrusive diagnostic tools to monitor artifacts with visible change. A subsequent Trondheim workshop focused on sensor developments, field tests, and feedback from project teams. Discussions included acceptable change definitions, cost calculations, and the importance of on-site assessments across different sensors. Collaborative insights aim to enhance the effectiveness of conservation solutions.

enan
Télécharger la présentation

Influence of Conservation Experts on Sensor Development: Insights from Krakow Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. End-User Workshops Influence of conservation experts on the scientific development of the sensors. Joel Taylor and May Cassar

  2. Krakow Workshop • 10 experts from across Europe • Expertise in strategic and technical aspects of preventive conservation • No experience, and therefore subjective focus, of project partners or sensor • A facilitator was invited to focus discussion about strategy and sensors • Questions prepared for discussion

  3. Participants Astrid Brandt-Grau, France Monika Fjaested, Sweden Marta Jaro, Hungary Barry Knight, UK Paula Menino Homem, Portugal Dorte Poulsen, Denmark Sarah Staniforth, UK David Thickett, UK Jorgen Wadum, Netherlands  Facilitator – Jonathan Ashley-Smith, UK

  4. They wanted… To be able to read it themselves (visible change) Short and long-term exposure Cheap and reliable Unobtrusive Diagnostic element Definitions of acceptable change

  5. Trondheim Workshop Astrid Brandt-Grau, France Vasco Fassina, Italy Marta Jaro, Hungary Rene Larsen, Denmark Paula Menino Homen, Portugal Sarah Staniforth, UK David Thickett, UK Marina van Bos, Belgium Jorgen Wadum, Holland Facilitator: Laura Drysdale, UK

  6. Review of Developments • Presentations on the sensor developments. • Question and answer session with project team. Some nice food and time to reflect on the work presented.

  7. Feedback • A presentation was prepared based on the developments that they heard about. Questions were responded to by the project team.

  8. They said… • Project group have taken on board recommendations from end user group • Presentation of field tests • Correlation with other measurements (passive samplers, light/T/RH) • Cost calculations • Development of visible sensors • They would like to see • On-site assessment • Exposure time (3 months) • Differences between sensors

  9. So…

More Related