1 / 25

Psychological Aspects and Measurement of

Psychological Aspects and Measurement of. John F. Rauthmann Leopold-Franzens University of Innsbruck, Austria 24.05.2010, Helsinki (Finland). Content. [1] What is Systems Intelligence (SI)? SI by Hämäläinen and Saarinen (2004, 2006, 2008)

erik
Télécharger la présentation

Psychological Aspects and Measurement of

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Psychological Aspects and Measurement of John F. Rauthmann Leopold-Franzens University of Innsbruck, Austria 24.05.2010, Helsinki (Finland)

  2. Content [1] What is Systems Intelligence (SI)? SI by Hämäläinen and Saarinen (2004, 2006, 2008) [2] How conceptualize SI psychologically? Proposing a psychological perspective on SI [3] How measure SI psychologically? Proposing a scale to measure Trait-SI [4] What to do with a psychological perspective on SI? Discussion of prospects with a psychological perspective on SI 1

  3. What is Systems Intelligence? 2

  4. A psychological conceptualization of SI • What is Systems Intelligence psychologically? • Different construct types in personality psychology: • Traits • Motives • Abilities and competencies • Styles • Systems Intelligence can be conceptualized differently within personality psychology. • For now: Ability-SI and Trait-SI 3

  5. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Ability-SI: Conceptualizing SI as an intelligence • Four basic questions: • What is “intelligence”? • Which “intelligences” are there? • How can SI be conceptualized as an “intelligence”? • Is SI an “intelligence”? 4

  6. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Ability-SI: What is “intelligence”? • Many different definitions of “intelligence” within psychology • No clear consensus on what exactly “intelligence” is • Neisser et al. (1998, p. 77): • Understanding complex ideas • Adapting flexibly to the environment • Learning from experiences • Engaging into various forms of reasoning • Overcoming obstacles by taking thought 5

  7. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Ability-SI: Which “intelligences” are there? • Maybe not be just one “intelligence”, but in fact many • No clear consensus on how many “intelligences” there are and which they are • Common intelligences: • Emotional Intelligence • Social Intelligence • Practical Intelligence • Successful Intelligence • Gardner’s multiple intelligences 6

  8. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Ability-SI: How can SI be conceptualized as an intelligence? • Different conceptualizations of “intelligence” in psychological literature • No clear consensus on the structure of “intelligence” • Common intelligence models: • Spearman: Two factor theory (g and s) • Thurstone: Primary mental abilities (v, w, n, s, m, p, r/i) • Cattell: Fluid and crystallised intelligence • Guilford: Structure of intellect • Carroll: Three stratum theory 7

  9. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Ability-SI: How can SI be conceptualized as an intelligence? • Stratum III (General): • General intelligence factor (g-factor) • Stratum II (Broad): • Fluid intelligence, crystallised intelligence, • general memory and learning, • broad visual perception, broad auditory perception, • broad retrieval ability, broad cognitive speediness and processing speed • Stratum I (Narrow): • 69 narrow abilities, each related to a specific Stratum II domain • Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities (CHC theory) • Amalgamation of two similar theories about the content and structure of human cognitive abilities • Gf-Gc theory (Cattell, 1941; Horn 1965) + Three Stratum Theory (Carroll, 1993) 8

  10. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Ability-SI: How can SI be conceptualized as an intelligence? • Implications of intelligence research for SI: • Distinction between intra- and interpersonal aspects • Different ability domains: cognition, affect/emotion – motivation – regulation, behavior • Distinctions between contents, operations, and outputs • Hierarchical structure of SI (g- and s-factors) with different strata • SI as a multidimensional and multifaceted construct • SI as incorporating different intelligence aspects (e.g., creativity, meta-cognitive components, etc.) 9

  11. A psychological conceptualization of SI Ability-SI: How can SI be conceptualized as an intelligence? Stratum I: Global undifferentiated SI-factor g Stratum II: Fluid and crystallised global SI-factors gf gc Stratum III: Specialized SI-abilities s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s6 s7 s8 10

  12. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Ability-SI: Is SI an “intelligence”? • Gardner’s eight criteria for an “intelligence”: 11 8

  13. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Trait-SI: Conceptualizing SI as a trait • Four basic questions: • What is a “trait”? • Which debates revolving around traits are there in personality psychology? • How can SI be conceptualized as a “trait”? • How should we measure Trait-SI? 12 4

  14. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Trait-SI: What is a “trait”? • Trait: • Enduring, stable, consistent • General description • Mental and/or behavioral characteristics • State: • Unstable, momentary, inconsistent • Personality psychology aims at assessing (measuring) stable traits, not states. 13 4

  15. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Trait-SI: Which debates are (were) there in personality psychology? • Four interrelated controversies: • Trait vs. state • Person vs. Situation • Structure vs. Process • Nomothetic vs. Idiographic • Implications: • Different perspectives on the human condition or how we think, feel, and act in situations • “False” dichotomisation of person vs. situation variables (cf. interactional systems) 14 4

  16. 15 4

  17. A psychological conceptualization of SI • Trait-SI: How can SI be conceptualized as a “trait”? • Different highlighted aspects: • Intertwinement of “person” and “situation” • Emphasis on processes / dynamics and (emergent) structures • Implications: • Focus on person and context variables • Systemic-synergetic perspective on personality and traits • Flexible usage of different paradigms and methodology • Assessment of individual differences in SI 16 4

  18. A psychological conceptualization of SI Trait-SI: How measure SI? Different types of types of data: 17 4

  19. A psychological measurement of SI • The Trait-SI Scale (TSIS): Item generation Item content and item generation (Hämäläinen & Saarinen, 2004, 2007, 2008): • Perceptional: Perceiving oneself and reciprocal influences in systems • Cognitive and meta-cognitive: Thinking and reflecting within systems • Emotional and motivational: Intuitively guided actions, empathy, motivation to persevere • Behavioural: productive behaviours Response format: 5-point Likert scale (“0 – I totally disagree” to “4 – I totally agree”) Result: 30 items related to Trait-SI aspects (e.g., “I exercise productive ways of influence within my surroundings”, “I perceive myself as part of a whole”) 18 4

  20. A psychological measurement of SI The Trait-SI Scale (TSIS): The study 19 4

  21. Results I Exploratory factor analysis: Principal components analysis Direct-oblimin rotation (δ = 0) Initial solution: 7 factors (57.03% variance) Horn’s parallel analysis (1965): 4 factors (46.31% variance) Retained factors: Effective systems handling Systemic reflection Holistic systems perspective Systemic flexibility 20 4

  22. Results II Construct validity: Bivariate zero-order Pearson correlations 21 4

  23. The Trait-SI Scale (TSIS): Interpretation of findings 22 4

  24. Future lines of research with a psychological take on SI • What can we do with a psychological perspective on SI? • Suggestions: • Relate the SI approach to the (broad) field of psychology in general and to different psychological sub-disciplines in specific • Study person x situation interactions (cf. situation psychology) • Psychometrics (i.e., reliably and validly assessing SI in individuals, groups, organisations) • Applied contexts (i.e., education, leadership, etc.) 23 4

  25. The End THANK YOU! 

More Related