1 / 8

ICHPER  SD Journal of Research Writers ’ Workshop

ICHPER  SD Journal of Research Writers ’ Workshop. Steven C. Wright, Ed.D. Kinesiology Pedagogy Coordinator University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA Email: Steven.wright@unh.edu Phone: (603)862-4408 Fax: (603) 862-0154 Editor - ICHPER  SD Journal of Research.

erin-fletcher
Télécharger la présentation

ICHPER  SD Journal of Research Writers ’ Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ICHPERSD Journal of Research Writers’ Workshop Steven C. Wright, Ed.D. Kinesiology Pedagogy Coordinator University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA Email: Steven.wright@unh.edu Phone: (603)862-4408 Fax: (603) 862-0154 Editor - ICHPERSD Journal of Research 53rd ICHPER-SD World Congress

  2. Content Questions • Does the manuscript make a significantand novel contribution to the field? • Is this manuscript characterized by original thinking? • Is the content timely and useful to the reader? 53rd ICHPER-SD World Congress

  3. Content Questions • Does this manuscript report specific, identifiable, advancement in knowledge? • Is the subject new or old, and is the treatment new or old? • Are conclusions justified, soundly based, and logically consistent with the support data? • Is the content theoretically sound? • Have there been major omissions in content? • Are the procedures and methods employed sufficiently clear that the work could be replicated? • Is the information to prior work pertinent, cited in the body of the paper, and complete? • Is the paper relevant? Does the manuscript have any practical information or use? 53rd ICHPER-SD World Congress

  4. Presentation Questions • Is the manuscript presented in a logical manner? • Is the manuscript readable? • Is the subject appropriate for the journal’s audience? • Does the manuscript conform to APA 6th edition style? • Is there an abstract and is it descriptive of the contents? • Is there an introduction that states the purpose of the manuscript? • Does the development of the central idea flow well? • Is the content appropriately organized and subdivided? • Is there unnecessary repetition? 53rd ICHPER-SD World Congress

  5. Presentation Questions • Is the title descriptive of the contents? • Have technical terms been defined? • Are all the figures and tables relevant and properly prepared? • Do the tables, diagrams, and figures add to, rather than duplicate, information in the narrative? • Is the manuscript excessively long or short (15-28 pgs double spaced)? 53rd ICHPER-SD World Congress

  6. Presentation Questions • Is the literature review complete and accurate? • Is the conclusion logical, complete, and clearly stated? • Are the references appropriate, current, and accurate? • Are there obvious omissions or errors in the reference list? 53rd ICHPER-SD World Congress

  7. The 10 Most Common Reasons for Rejection of a Manuscript • The quality of writing is poor. • It offers no new insights or information. • It is over-documented to the extent that references hinder the flow of reading. • The topic is too narrow in scope. • It is largely a promotional piece for a person, place or product. • It is a review of information available in other publications. • The content would not be of interest to HPERD professionals. • It includes information that is inaccurate or outdated. • It is not research-based. 53rd ICHPER-SD World Congress

  8. ICHPERSD Journal of ResearchReview Process • Author submits manuscript to ICHPERSD, via email or mail. ICHPERSD will confirm that main author is a member and then send manuscript to the editor. • Editor will send the manuscript out for review, with a request to return the manuscript within 30 days. • Once reviewers have sent in reviews, the editor will contact the main author with the decision and reviewers’ comments. • If the decision is to re-submit, then the editor will determine if sufficient changes have occurred for the manuscript to be published. 53rd ICHPER-SD World Congress

More Related