1 / 24

FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE MASSACHUSETTS WORKFORCE PARTNERS’ MEETING MARCH 3, 2010

FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE MASSACHUSETTS WORKFORCE PARTNERS’ MEETING MARCH 3, 2010. Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lieutenant Governor Joanne F. Goldstein, Secretary, EOLWD. Why talk about Fraud, Waste, and Abuse? .

esmerelda
Télécharger la présentation

FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE MASSACHUSETTS WORKFORCE PARTNERS’ MEETING MARCH 3, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE MASSACHUSETTS WORKFORCE PARTNERS’ MEETING MARCH 3, 2010 Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lieutenant Governor Joanne F. Goldstein, Secretary, EOLWD

  2. Why talk about Fraud, Waste, and Abuse? * With the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) came unprecedented levels of transparency and scrutiny. * It is critical that everyone receiving ARRA funding ensure that they have the proper mechanisms in place to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse. * Training is an essential part of that effort.

  3. Today’s Objectives 3 After today’s presentation, you should be able to: Demonstrate a heightened sensitivity and awareness of fraud and misconduct risks. Identify potential areas of your programs which may be susceptible to fraud and misconduct risks. Describe effective Fraud Risk Management strategies. Identify available resources to help prevent, detect, and respond to fraud.

  4. All Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Has the Same Pattern

  5. Pressure/Motivation • There is a will to commit fraud, waste, and/or abuse: • External pressures • Budgetary pressures • Financial need • Being a team player

  6. Opportunity • There is minimal oversight or lack of controls within the organization: • Lax controls • Poor oversight • Lack of guidance

  7. Rationalization • Individuals who commit fraud, waste, and abuse view it as an accepted practice or part of their rights as a contractor or employee: • Had to spend it or lose it. • No personal gain – for the organization. • No one cares. • I didn’t know.

  8. What is Fraud? There are a number of different definitions, but fraud is largely a deliberate deception to secure an unfair gain. This could be a monetary, contractual, or other type of advantage that is unlawful.

  9. “Red Flag”Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Indicators Red flag indicators are activities that may indicate trouble in any process. These are best described as clues or hints that something outside the norm has occurred and that a closer look at an area or activity is required. These indicators include, but are not limited to, the following.

  10. Procurement Risks and Red Flags • Bribery and Kickbacks • Bid Rigging and Collusion • Conflicts of Interest

  11. Bribery and Kickbacks In bribery and kickback schemes, a contractor or subcontractor pays a fee to the government employee for being awarded the contract. Indicators include, but are not limited to: • Purchase amount exceeds needs • Short list of vendors • Poor quality performance

  12. Bribery and Kickbacks (continued) • A public official or employee who has a lifestyle that dramatically exceeds his or her salary • A contracting employee who insists contractors use a certain sub-contractor or broker • A contracting employee who shows a keen interest in the award of a contract or purchase order to a particular contractor or vendor

  13. Bid Rigging and Collusion In bid rigging and collusion, contractors misrepresent that they are competing against each other when, in fact, they have agreed to cooperate on the winning bid to increase job profit. Indicators include: • Apparent connections between bidders; common addresses, personnel, or telephone numbers • Unusual bid patterns: too close, too high, round numbers, or identical winning margins or percentages

  14. Bid Rigging and Collusion (continued) • Bid prices dropping when a new bidder enters the competition • Different contractors making identical errors in contract bids • Losing bidders hired as subcontractors • Losing bidders submitting identical line-item bid amounts on non-standard items

  15. Conflicts of Interest In fraud involving conflict of interest, a public official misrepresents that he or she is impartial in business decisions when he or she has an undisclosed financial interest in a contractor or consultant. These indicators include, but are not limited to: • Unexplained or unusual favoritism shown to a particular contractor or consultant • A public official disclosing confidential bid information to a contractor or assisting the contractor in preparing the bid

  16. Conflicts of Interest (continued) • A public official having discussions about employment with a current or prospective contractor or consultant • A close socialization with and acceptance of inappropriate gifts, travel, or entertainment from a contractor or the ability to purchase such items at below fair market value • A vendor or consultant address being incomplete or matching an employee’s address

  17. Contract Performance Risks and Red Flags • Fraudulent Billing • Ghost Employees • Falsified Wages

  18. Fraudulent Billing • Fraudulent invoices • Mischaracterized expenses (personal vs. business) • Overstated expenses/inflated billing • Double billing • A refusal or inability to provide supporting documentation

  19. Ghost Employees • No evaluations, raises, or promotion over an extended period • Terminated employees still on payroll • Employees with duplicate addresses, checking accounts, or social security numbers • Employees with no withholding taxes, insurance, or other normal deductions • Unusual number of employee with P.O. Boxes or Drop Boxes for home addresses, or lack home addresses

  20. Falsified Wages • Large or unusual overtime payments to selected employees • Large or unusual hours worked in a pay cycle • Unauthorized alterations to timecards and other source records • Timecards are filled out by supervisors, not by employees

  21. Effectively Managing Fraud Risk • Control Your Environment • Management sets the tone • Clear rules and procedures for work performance and employee behavior • Risk Assessment • Ongoing process to identify where the organization may be vulnerable to fraud, waste, and abuse • Appropriate Oversight • Finance and Audit Committee • Internal Control Plan • Independent Auditors

  22. Managing Fraud Risk (continued) • Division of Responsibility • Different people handle authorizing transactions, recording them, and implementing them • Multiple signatories • Employee Complaint Mechanism • Fraud Prevention Education • Performance Measurement • Reporting

  23. What to Do If You SuspectFraud, Waste or Abuse • If you have evidence of Fraud, Waste or Abuse activity, go to www.mass.gov/recovery and click on the Fraud report button

  24. Whistleblower Protections • ARRA provides protection for employees of non-federal employers who receive recovery funds, including state and local governments, contractors, subcontractors, and grantees. • You cannot be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for making a protected disclosure. • For more information, go to the federal recovery website – www.recovery.gov.

More Related