html5-img
1 / 14

Global Partnership Program

Global Partnership Program. Inter-Regional Design Workshop September 11 – 15, 2006 Cairo, Egypt Tom Remington Catholic Relief Services. Presentation Outline. Catholic Relief Services CRS-CIAT-FoodNet Agroenterprise Learning Alliance Lessons learned & Looking to the future. CRS.

espen
Télécharger la présentation

Global Partnership Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Global Partnership Program Inter-Regional Design Workshop September 11 – 15, 2006 Cairo, Egypt Tom Remington Catholic Relief Services

  2. Presentation Outline • Catholic Relief Services • CRS-CIAT-FoodNet Agroenterprise Learning Alliance • Lessons learned & Looking to the future

  3. CRS • Relief & Development Agency of the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops • Large ($500 million) & Global (80 countries) • “CRS is the hub of the largest and most effective agriculture relief and development network in the world” • Either not seeing or refusing to see the need to embrace a market approach – need to move CRS out of the ‘comfort zone’

  4. Shift from Food Security to Agroenterprise • First discussion in September 2001 in Entebbe • Learning Alliance with CIAT and FoodNet in 2002 • 8 countries in East & Southern Africa • 6 workshops from 2002 to 2006

  5. Internal Results Completed the RAeD roadmap • Territory identification • Interest group formation • Market opportunity identification • Market chain analyses • Integrated agroenterprise activities

  6. Country Performance • MOIs identified high value commodities – Ethiopia & Madagascar • MCAs resulted in paralysis • Eventual coalescence around the dual purpose pulses & legumes • Facilitated MCAs to move forward • More effective engagement of the IARCs

  7. MOI - Commodity Focus • FFV – market gardening • Characterized by: • High costs – especially irrigation • Local markets • Challenge to scale • Start with current commodities • Farming system intensification • Institutional and farmer co-evolution – learning together • Pulses/Legumes but also Roots/Tubers • Low barriers to entry (financial and human)

  8. From Effective to Efficient(and then Expansion) • Navy bean in Ethiopian Rift Valley • Two market premium varieties • Two export brokers • 3000 farmers • Chickpea & Pigeonpea in Northern Tanzania • 3 chickpea and 4 pigeonpea varieties • 2400 farmers

  9. Agroenterprise Learning Alliance Embraced by CRS • Both the topic and the approach • From a learning to an action alliance in East Africa • New learning alliances in Southeast Asia, West Africa & South Asia (ongoing multi-institutional alliance in Latin America) • Farmer Group integration • Strategy for scaling up and scaling out

  10. Greater Focus on Farmer Organizations • Identified gap in the learning alliance • Perceived strength of CRS & NGOs • Led to a CRS-CIAT Farmer Group Study Tour • 3 countries (Uganda, Bolivia, India) • Different types (CIAL, SHG, FFS, Market Groups etc.)

  11. Farmer Group Internal Savings & Lending Financial Capital Self Help Group Social Capital Agriculture Learning Human Capital Agroenterprise Physical Capital Natural Resource Management Natural Capital

  12. Farmer Group Focus • On the Farm Family • Small informal groups • Build on and strengthen existing social capital • Multi-functional • Flexible

  13. Scaling Up & Out • Preparing Millions for the Market • Three scaling labs • India • Ethiopia • Tanzania • Increased scope • 35 countries in 7 CRS regions

  14. The CRS Niche • Focus on farmers ‘left behind’ • Initially, focus on the dual purpose commodities • Informal first order farmer groups • Strong partnership with research for technology access and evaluation • Emphasis on internal savings & lending • Objective of both scale and scope

More Related