1 / 53

TAbMEP Assessment: POLARCAT H 2 O Measurements

TAbMEP Assessment: POLARCAT H 2 O Measurements. Assessment Summary. Table 1. Recommended POLARCAT H 2 O measurement treatment. a The PI reported uncertainty was recommended because no IEIP precision value could be calculated for the ATR-42 Falcon data. Assessment Summary Cont.

essien
Télécharger la présentation

TAbMEP Assessment: POLARCAT H 2 O Measurements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TAbMEP Assessment: POLARCAT H2O Measurements

  2. Assessment Summary Table 1. Recommended POLARCAT H2O measurement treatment a The PI reported uncertainty was recommended because no IEIP precision value could be calculated for the ATR-42 Falcon data

  3. Assessment Summary Cont. Table 2. TAbMEP unified data sets • Only the DC-8 vs. DLR Falcon intercomparison meets the condition that 90% of data fall within the 2σ uncertainty bounds, making it a TAbMEP unified data set • Remaining intercomparisons contain systematic error that cannot be fully accounted for in uncertainty calculations, causing the recommended uncertainties to be insufficient for TAbMEP unified data set requirements

  4. Assessment Summary Cont. Table 3. POLARCAT H2O bias estimates

  5. Assessment Summary Cont. Table 4. POLARCAT H2O precision (1σ) comparisons

  6. P-3B vs. DC-8

  7. P-3B vs. DC-8 04/08/2008

  8. DC-8 04/08/2008 IEIP = 1.5%

  9. DC-8 04/08/2008 STD = 0.0022 g/kg

  10. P-3B vs. DC-8 04/08/2008

  11. P-3B vs. DC-8 04/08/2008

  12. P-3B vs. DC-8 04/08/2008

  13. P-3B vs. DC-8 04/19/2008

  14. DC-8 04/19/2008 IEIP = 3.5%

  15. DC-8 04/19/2008 STD = 0.0045 g/kg

  16. P-3B vs. DC-8 04/19/2008

  17. P-3B vs. DC-8 04/19/2008

  18. P-3B vs. DC-8 04/19/2008

  19. P-3B vs. DC-8 07/10/2008

  20. P-3B vs. DC-8 07/10/2008

  21. DC-8 07/10/2008 IEIP = 2.5%

  22. DC-8 07/10/2008 STD = 0.0050 g/kg

  23. P-3B vs. DC-8 07/10/2008

  24. P-3B vs. DC-8 07/10/2008

  25. P-3B vs. DC-8 07/10/2008

  26. P-3B vs. DC-8 All Flights

  27. P-3B vs. DC-8 All Flights

  28. P-3B vs. DC-8 All Flights

  29. WP-3D vs. DC-8 04/12/2008

  30. WP-3D vs. DC-8 04/12/2008

  31. DC-8 04/12/2008 IEIP = 2.2%

  32. DC-8 04/12/2008 STD = 0.0030 g/kg

  33. WP-3D vs. DC-8 04/12/2008

  34. WP-3D vs. DC-8 04/12/2008

  35. WP-3D vs. DC-8 04/12/2008

  36. P-3B vs. WP-3D 04/15/2008

  37. P-3B vs. WP-3D 04/15/2008

  38. P-3B vs. WP-3D 04/15/2008

  39. P-3B vs. WP-3D 04/15/2008

  40. P-3B vs. WP-3D 04/15/2008

  41. DLR Falcon vs. DC-8 07/09/2008

  42. DLR Falcon vs. DC-8 07/09/2008

  43. DC-8 07/09/2008 IEIP = 2.5%

  44. DC-8 07/09/2008 STD = 0.0050 g/kg

  45. DLR Falcon vs. DC-8 07/09/2008

  46. DLR Falcon vs. DC-8 07/09/2008

  47. DLR Falcon vs. DC-8 07/09/2008

  48. DLR Falcon vs. ATR-42 Falcon 07/14/2008

  49. DLR Falcon vs. ATR-42 Falcon 07/14/2008

  50. DLR Falcon vs. ATR-42 Falcon 07/14/2008

More Related