1 / 20

` A Case for Environmental Management Control of Malaria in Anambra State ’

Health and Economic Burden of Malaria and our Community Environment. ` A Case for Environmental Management Control of Malaria in Anambra State ’. Henry Debem ( Ph.D . Student ) Walden University, USA PUBH 8165 Instructor : Dr. Lezah Brown-Ellington Spring Term, 2013. Learning Objectives

etoile
Télécharger la présentation

` A Case for Environmental Management Control of Malaria in Anambra State ’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Health and Economic Burden of Malaria and our Community Environment ` A Case for Environmental Management Control of Malaria in Anambra State ’ Henry Debem (Ph.D. Student) Walden University, USA PUBH 8165 Instructor : Dr. Lezah Brown-Ellington Spring Term, 2013

  2. Learning Objectives • What is Malaria? • Global Epidemiological Background of Malaria • Nigerian Context of Malaria Burden • Health and Economic • Brief Background of Anambra state • Current Malaria Control Measures in Anambra State • Common Points of Interference for Malaria Control • Key Stakeholders of Malaria Control in Anambra State • Environmental Risk Practices in Anambra State • Environmental Management Control (EMC) Measures • Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of EMC • Other Advantages of EMC • Recommendations for Malaria Eradication in Anambra State. • Revision of the Learning Objectives Presentation Outline

  3. At the end of this presentation, participants will be able to: • Learn mosquito and malaria cycle • Understand the health and economic burden of malaria in the World and Nigeria • Learn the current control measures in Anambra State and their Merits and Demerits • Understand the superiority of Environmental Management Control over others • Make better informed and strategic decisions in the fight against malaria in Anambra Communities and beyond. Learning Objectives

  4. Vector-borne disease caused by transmission of Plasmodium species by Anopheles mosquitoes. • Plasmodium specie is the malaria parasite that causes malaria in humans • Transmission occurs through mosquito bites on humans during blood meals • Mosquitoes primarily breed in water What is Malaria?

  5. Plasmodium sp. and Mosquito Life Cycle Images Retrieved from: 1. www.scienceblogs.com 2. Skeeters. www.bcps.org

  6. Global Epidemiological Background of Malaria • Global and African Context: • Malaria, a serious global concern particularly in Africa • About half the world’s population (3.3 billion people) are affected by Malaria • 216 million cases occurred in 2010; 81% in African region • Malaria caused over 600,000 deaths in 2010; 91% in African region • Third leading cause of death for children under 5 years • Almost 1 out of 5 deaths of children under 5 in Africa is caused by Malaria WHO (2013). Global health observatory. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/gho/malaria/en/index.html

  7. Health Burden: • Nigeria bears about 25% of the Malaria burden in Africa • About 97% of the Nigeria’s population is at risk of Malaria • Estimated 110 million malaria cases and 300,000 death annually • Estimated 11% of maternal deaths is caused by malaria Nigeria Context of Malaria Burden Chima, R., Goodman, C., & Mills, A. (2003). The economic impact of malaria in Africa: a critical review of the evidence. Health Policy,63(1), 17-36. National Malaria Control Program [NMCP] (2012). Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey 2010. WHO (2013). Global health observatory. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/gho/malaria/en/index.html

  8. Economic burden: • Costs can be divided into direct and indirect cost • Direct costs – households and government expenditures on treatment and prevention • Indirect costs – losses of labor productive time due to mortality and morbidity • Nigeria Government losses close to $1 billion ($868,421,052) annually (Jimoh, et al, 2007) • In general context (Other studies outside Nigeria): • Monthly expenditure on malaria treatment is between $0.41 and $3.88 per person • Treatment equivalent between $1.88 and $26 per household (Chima, et al, 2003) • Very poor households spend 28% of their income on Malaria • In Africa, government spend estimated $1.83 and $8.01 per person (Shepard, et al, 1991) Nigeria Context of Malaria Burden…2 Chima, R., Goodman, C., & Mills, A. (2003). The economic impact of malaria in Africa: a critical review of the evidence. Health Policy,63(1), 17-36. Jimoh, A., O. Sofola, A. Petu, and T. Okorosobo. 2007. “Quantifying the Economic Burden of Malaria in Nigeria Using the Willingness to Pay Approach.” Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2007, 5:6. doi:10.1186/1478-7547-5-6. Shepard, D., Ettling, M., Brinkmann, U., & Sauerborn, R. (1991). The economic cost of malaria in Africa. Tropical Medicine And Parasitology: Official Organ Of Deutsche TropenmedizinischeGesellschaft And Of Deutsche GesellschaftFürTechnischeZusammenarbeit (GTZ), 42(3), 199-203.

  9. Created in 1991 and Located in the South Eastern Nigeria • Eight most populated state (4,055,048) and second most densely populated (840/km2) in Nigeria. • Total area of 4,844 km2 • Dominated by Igbos by tribe (98%) • Capital City as Awka, while Onitsha and Nnewi are the biggest most commercial cities Brief Background of Anambra State National Population Commission [NPC] (2008). Demographic and Health Survey [DHS] 2008.

  10. Most Malaria program in Nigeria, including the 1998 WHO RBM program adopted these Strategies: • Diagnosisand treatment (D&T) with effective medicines • Distribution and use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) to achieve coverage of populations at risk, with particular focus on Children under 5 and Pregnant women • Indoor residual spraying (IRS) to curtail transmission • Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) Current Malaria Control Strategies in Anambra National Malaria Control Program [NMCP] (2012). Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey 2010.

  11. Concerns • No emphasis on the vectors life cycle (Weak intervention) • Expensive particularly in poor regions (Cost of regular purchases and maintenance) • High behavioral adherence / compliance requirements. E.g. only 35% of the population in the South Eastern Nigeria use at least one bed net(NMCP, 2012). IRS, ITN IRS, ITN IPT, D&T IPT, D&T Common Points of Interference for Malaria Controls Image retrieved from: www.crick.ac.uk National Malaria Control Program [NMCP] (2012). Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey 2010.

  12. Government: • Federal and State of Ministries of Health • National and State Malaria Control Programs • Local Health Departments • Primary Health Care Departments • Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) • Community based Non-Governmental Organizations • Community groups and Coalitions • Major Donor Agencies • WHO • USAID • DFID • World Bank • Global Fund Stakeholders of Malaria in Anambra State National Malaria Control Program [NMCP] (2012). Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey 2010.

  13. Vegetation Clearance • Fumigation of bushes • Draining swamps • Surface application of oil to open water bodies • Modification of River boundaries • Disposal of all potential open water storage facilities and objects away from residential area. Environmental Management Control (EMC) Strategies Utzinger, J., Tozan, Y., & Singer, B. (2001). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of environmental management for malaria control. Tropical Medicine & International Health: TM & IH, 6(9), 677-687.

  14. Environmental Risk Practices in Anambra State • Indiscriminate dumps of refuses and wastes close to residences • Dumps in swamps and drainages causing stagnant waters • Abandonment of vegetation's and bushes within residential areas. • Farming within residential areas

  15. Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of EMC • Studies have shown that EMC in combination with quinine and ITN is capable of: • Reducing malaria related incidence, morbidity, and mortality rates by 70 – 95% within 3 - 5 years • Averting estimated 4173 deaths and 161,205 malaria attacks in one local community in 20 years • Saving estimated $858 per death and $22.20 per attack . • Averting disability adjusted life year (DALY) to the cost of $524 – 591 per DALY Utzinger, J., Tozan, Y., & Singer, B. (2001). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of environmental management for malaria control. Tropical Medicine & International Health: TM & IH, 6(9), 677-687.

  16. Other Advantages of EMC • Strong benefits of the EMC strategy is the potential to: • Leverage the available community resources; hence, saving great cost • Create more effective community sustainability and ownership. • Encourage sound community participation and communal efforts. • Provide less stringent behavioral compliance • No significant side effect • Address other of other environmental issues unrelated to malaria.

  17. Recommendations for Malaria Eradication in our Communities • First, malaria eradication, rather than malaria control should be emphasized in the state policy and strategic plan for communities. • Channel more proportion of Malaria control donor and government funds to community EMC • Empower and involve the State environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as active stakeholders in the fight against Malaria • Strengthen the community participation in the community EMC • Leverage the community resources to support this strategy • Empower the community leaderships to support this course in every community. Utzinger, J., Tozan, Y., & Singer, B. (2001). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of environmental management for malaria control. Tropical Medicine & International Health: TM & IH, 6(9), 677-687.

  18. Reference Chima, R., Goodman, C., & Mills, A. (2003). The economic impact of malaria in Africa: a critical review of the evidence. Health Policy, 63(1), 17-36. Jimoh, A., O. Sofola, A. Petu, and T. Okorosobo. 2007. “Quantifying the Economic Burden of Malaria in Nigeria Using the Willingness to Pay Approach.” Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2007, 5:6. doi:10.1186/1478-7547-5-6. National Malaria Control Program [NMCP] (2012). Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey 2010. National Population Commission [NPC] (2008). Demographic and Health Survey [DHS] 2008. Shepard, D., Ettling, M., Brinkmann, U., & Sauerborn, R. (1991). The economic cost of malaria in Africa. Tropical Medicine And Parasitology: Official Organ Of Deutsche TropenmedizinischeGesellschaft And Of Deutsche GesellschaftFürTechnischeZusammenarbeit (GTZ), 42(3), 199-203. Utzinger, J., Tozan, Y., & Singer, B. (2001). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of environmental management for malaria control. Tropical Medicine & International Health: TM & IH, 6(9), 677-687. WHO (2013). Global health observatory. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/gho/malaria/en/index.html

  19. Revision of Learning Objectives • Have we achieved the objectives of this presentation, otherwise ask questions for further clarifications? • Do you understand the mosquito and malaria cycle? • Do you understand the health and economic? burden of malaria in the World and Nigeria? • Do you know the available malaria control measures in Anambra State and their Merits and Demerits? • Do you know the advantages of EMC over others? • Can you now make better informed and strategic decisions on the fight against malaria in your communities? Utzinger, J., Tozan, Y., & Singer, B. (2001). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of environmental management for malaria control. Tropical Medicine & International Health: TM & IH, 6(9), 677-687.

More Related