1 / 12

Understanding Hofstede and Hall's Cultural Dimensions in the 21st Century

This lecture explores the relevance of Hofstede's cultural dimensions, including critiques and alternative perspectives by Edward Hall on high and low-context cultures. It discusses ideas surrounding cultural diversity and individualism in a globalized world, drawing on data collected from 1967-1973. The session addresses the implications of etic and emic approaches in managing multicultural groups, and how historical and contemporary contexts influence communication and relationships in varying cultures. The analysis seeks to understand both enduring themes and modern changes in cultural behavior.

euclid
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding Hofstede and Hall's Cultural Dimensions in the 21st Century

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 21811 CCA Lecture 3 • Complete Week 2 material: ^ Hofstede in the 21st century. ^Other related ‘etic’-type work. ^Some critique. • Another view... Ed Hall and ‘context.’

  2. Hofstede’s work: Dated or Enduring? • Bulk of data from 1967-1973 (with later corroboration) • Hofstede (2001) limited convergence of cultural values …although richer=more individualistic. • And (2001), p.455, ‘for the next hundred years, countries will remain culturally very diverse’. • Basic change (for Hofstede) over 50-100 years or due to extremely dramatic outside events

  3. Other work within this tradition • Trompenaars’s 7 dimensions-based on solutions ‘did the pedestrian die?’ • Hall. ‘High’ and ‘low’ context societies, based on communication patterns (see Week 3.) • Minkov (2007) e.g. Indulgence v Restraint

  4. Do the ‘etic’ approaches coalesce? • Hofstede’s high collectivism • Trompenaars’s ‘diffuse’ societies • Hall’s key importance of relationships in high context countries e.g. in Japan

  5. Beyond criticism? • alternative ‘emic’ approach – ref also Week 4 • how do ‘etic’ approaches help us manage multi-cultural groups when they ‘clash and fuse’ in everyday life’? • Convergence and globalisation - see Week 5

  6. Another ‘etic’ (comparative) approach: High and Low Context cultures • Edward Hall (1959 & 1990) • Cultures distinguished by preferred communication style. • ‘Context’ ?

  7. High and Low Context Cultures • An historical meeting

  8. Some profound differences • Overt/covert messages (coding) • Locus of control (‘face’) • NVC • Expression/masking • Cohesion/bonds • Relationship/task • Time • Space (see also Weeks 6 & 7)

  9. Low and high context exists in any one society

  10. ‘Etic’ Comparative approach • Bedrock of knowledge when understanding culture in business. • Subtle differences within an overall frame. • Time to move on? See Week 4.

  11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsIOwPACyOw

More Related