1 / 40

Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard ”

Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard ”. Accountability Data 2013. Raising the Standard. 2012 -2013 3rd Grade MCT2 Language Arts. 2012 - 2013 3rd Grade MCT2 Math. 2012 - 2013 4th Grade MCT2 Language Arts. 2012 – 2013 4th Grade MCT2 Mathematics.

evan
Télécharger la présentation

Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard ”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jackson County School District“Raising the Standard” Accountability Data 2013 Raising the Standard

  2. 2012 -2013 3rd Grade MCT2 Language Arts

  3. 2012 - 2013 3rd Grade MCT2 Math

  4. 2012 - 2013 4th Grade MCT2 Language Arts

  5. 2012 – 2013 4th Grade MCT2 Mathematics

  6. 2012 - 2013 5th Grade Language Arts

  7. 2012 - 2013 5th Grade Mathematics

  8. 2012 – 2013 Grade 5 Science (MST)

  9. 2012 - 2013 6th Grade Language Arts

  10. 2012 - 2013 6th Grade Mathematics

  11. 2012 - 2013 7th Grade Language Arts

  12. 2012 - 2013 7th Grade Mathematics

  13. 2012 - 2013 8th Grade Language Arts

  14. 2012 - 2013 8th Grade Mathematics

  15. 2012 – 2013 Grade 8 Science (MST)

  16. 2012 - 2013 8th Grade Algebra I

  17. 2012 - 2013 Algebra I (High School)

  18. 2012 – 2013 English II

  19. 2012 – 2013 Biology I

  20. 2012 – 2013 U.S. History

  21. ACT Five Year TrendMS and JCSD

  22. ACT ~ Five Year Trend2013 JCSD 20.8 (.6 net gain over five years)

  23. Accountability Overview 2013 The 151 districts in the state are ranked as listed below: A – 18 (including Corinth – Excellence for All Pilot) B – 45 (including Gulport) – Excellence for All Pilot) C – 36 D – 37 (including Clarksdale – Excellence for All Pilot) F – 15

  24. Accountability 2013 • The JCSD Overall District Accountability Label is: B QDI is 188(up from 182 last year) Met Growth (0.183) Graduation Rate is: 4 year: 81.0 5 year: 78.8

  25. 2013 School Level Accountability Labels • The following is a list of the schools who were assigned an accountability label. • VHS 217 ( ↑ 213) Met (0.601) A • ECHS209 (↓ 213) Met (0.581) A • ECUE 196 (↑183) Met (0.195) B • SMUE 190 (↑179) Met (0.129) B • SMHS 192 (↓ 196) Met (0.228) B • SMMS 186 (↑184) Met (0.216) B • VMS 185 (↑180) Met (0.015) B • VUE 185 (↑ 176) Met (0.169) B • ECMS 181 (↑179) Met (0.006) B • SMEE 206(↑ 202)N/A Not Assigned • SMNE 205 (↑183)N/A Not Assigned

  26. Jackson County School District Graduation Rate is 81.0 (4 year).2009 - 70.4 % 2010 - 75.6 % 2011 – 76.42012 – 77.3

  27. 2013 Jackson County School District Individual High School Graduation Rates and HSCIs Grad Rate HSCI Vancleave High 2013: 4 year – 76.7 5 year: 79.1 2013 – 204.9 2012 – 75.5 2012 – 185 2011 - 75.32011 - 189.8 St. Martin High 2013: 4 year – 81.5 5 year – 73.0 2013 – 187.1 2012 – 75.6 2012 - 194 2011- 76.9 2011- 194.6 East Central High2013: 4 year - 83.7 5 year: 87.0 2013 - 237.0 2011 - 76.9 2011 - 190.6 2012 - 81.5 2012 - 209

  28. HSV – High School Value Prior to 2013, in order to be assigned a label of A, schools and districts had to meet growth and have a QDI of 200 or above. This year, however, another number -- high school value (HSV) -- took both QDI and graduation rates into account, and if a district scored a 280 or above with that figure, they could be an A school whether or not their QDI reached the 200 mark.

  29. 2013 JCSD Data as Compared to Coastal Area School Districts District Accountability Label QDI/HSV Growth • Pass Christian A 213/301 Met • Biloxi A 206/292 Met • Ocean Springs A 198/284 Met • Long Beach A 198/282 Met • Hancock B 191/271 Met • JCSD B 188/269 Met • Bay/Waveland B 186/274 Met • Harrison B 185/261 Met • George County B 179/260 Met • Pascagoula B 168/244 Met • Moss Point D 134/198 Not Met • Gulfport N/A Excellence for All Pilot

  30. 2013 4 Year Graduation Rate, HSCI and HSV ofArea High Schools Graduation Rate HSCI HSV D’Iberville HS 93.4 206.8 286 Bay HS 87.7 250 286 Pass Christian HS 86.9 218.1 310 Ocean Springs HS 86.3 208.2 307 Biloxi HS 85.7 239.9 296 Long Beach HS 84.3 254 298 East Central HS 83.7 237 293 St. Martin HS 81.5 187.1 274 George County High 80.6 193.5 267 Hancock HS 80.2 216 294 Gautier HS 79.3 202.4 271 Vancleave HS 76.4 204.9 294 Pascagoula HS 72.8 209.8 247 Gulfport HS 71.2 185.3 269 Harrison Central HS 66.7 180.2 248 Moss Point HS 63.7 154.5 218

  31. 2013 Performance Data for Area High Schools QDI HSV Growth Perf. Classification Pass Christian High 223 310 No B Ocean Springs High 221 307 Yes A Vancleave High 217 294 Yes A Hancock High 214 294 Yes A Long Beach High 214 298 No B East Central High 209 293 Yes A Biloxi High 210 296 Yes A West Harrison High 206 286 Yes A D’Iberville Senior High 203 286 No B Bay High School 198 286 No B St. Martin High 192 274 Yes B Gautier High 192 271 Yes B George County High 186 267 No C Harrison Central 181 248 No C Pascagoula High 174 247 Yes B Moss Point High 154 218 Yes C Gulfport High N/A Excellence for All Pilot

  32. 2013 Performance Data of Area Middle Schools QDI Met Growth Perf. Label • Pass Christian Middle 209 Yes A • Long Beach Middle 207 Yes A • Biloxi Junior High 206 Yes A • Hancock Middle 199 Yes B • Ocean Springs Middle 199 Yes B • D’Iberville Middle 191 No C • Bay Waveland Middle 191 Yes B • George County Middle School 187 Yes B • St. Martin Middle 186 Yes B • Vancleave Middle 185 Yes B • East Central Middle 181 Yes B • Gautier Middle School 176 Yes B • Colmer Middle 171 Yes B • Trent Lott 6th Grade Academy 157 Yes C • Magnolia Jr. High (Moss Point) 133 No D • Gulfport Central Middle N/A • Bayou View Middle N/A

  33. 2013 Performance Data for Area Elementary Schools QDI Met Growth Perf. Label Delisle Elementary 227 Yes A North Bay Elem. (Biloxi) 223 Yes A Pass Christian Elem. 213 Yes A Beach Elem. 209 Yes A St. Martin East 206* St. Martin North 205* East Central Upper 196 Yes B Saucier Elementary 193 No C OS Upper Elementary 191 Yes B St. Martin Upper 190 Yes B Gorenflo Elem 187 Yes B Woolmarket Elementary 186 Yes B Vancleave Upper 185 Yes B Gautier Elementary 166 No C Central Elem (Pascagoula) 166 Yes B Lake Elem. 160 Yes C Moss Point Upper 131 Yes D Moss Point Lower 135 Yes C Bayou View Elem. N/A Anniston Elementary N/A

  34. Top 34 Highest Ranking Districts in MS (Ranked by QDI/HSV) • Pass Christian 214/301 – A New Albany 195/277 - B • Clinton 208/295 – A Tishomingo Co. 193/278 - B • Enterprise 206/297 – A Pearl River County 192/270 - B • Biloxi 206/292 – A Webster County 191/281 – A • Oxford 202/288 – A Newton County 191/273 - B • Kosciusko 202/284 – A Hancock County 191/271 - B • Amory 202/276 - A Monroe County 190/274 - B • Booneville 201/291 – A Senatobia 189/271 - B • Petal 201/284 – A Jackson County 188/269 – B • ($7995.00 per student/ ranked 131 of 152 in terms of Per Pupil Expenditure) • Pontotoc City 199/287 – A Tupelo 188/262 - B • Madison Co. 199/285 – A Bay St. Louis 186/274 - B • DeSoto County 199/284 – A Pearl 186/266 - B • Ocean Springs 198/284 – A Grenada 186/258 - B • Long Beach 198/282 – A Lowndes County 185/265 - B • Lamar County 197/283 – A Harrison County 185/262 - B • Rankin County 196/282 – A Union County 184/272 - B • Union City 195/283 – A Pontotoc County 184/270 - B

  35. Note: In 2013, there are only 13 districts that met the following criteria: * District label as either A or B * Schools in these districts are either all A’s or a combination of A and B schools. (A district had to have at least one A school to be included in this group.) * All schools met growth. Jackson County is one of the thirteen that met the criteria to be included in this group. A list of these district is included on the next slide.

  36. Biloxi Booneville Clinton JCSD Lamar County Lincoln County Monroe County New Albany Newton County Ocean Springs Oxford Pearl Tishomingo County

  37. Changes in NCLB Requirements (effective 2012) • The model changed in August 2012 due to the ESEA Flexibility Request. • School Districts no longer receive a label. • AYP is no longer measured. • New Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). • Schools should cut in half the difference between current (2011) proficiency rates and 100 % proficiency in six years (2017) overall and for each subgroup in E/LA and Math.

  38. Mississippi Federal Differentiated Accountability Model • Priority (Lowest Performing 5% of Title I Schools) • Focus (10 % of Title I schools with the biggest achievement gaps and/or lowest subgroup achievement. • Approaching Target (Schools that miss AMO targets for a category for two years.) • On Target • Reward (High Performers and Big Improvers)

  39. JCSD School Labels ~ 2013 • ECLE – Approaching Target (based on ECUE) • ECUE – Approaching Target • SMNE – Approaching Target • SMEE – Approaching Target • SMUE – Approaching Target • VLE – Approaching Target (based on VUE) • VUE – Approaching Target

  40. In Summary: The JCSD Overall District Accountability Label is: B QDI is 188 HSV is 269 Met Growth Graduation Rate is 81.0 (4 year), 78.8 (5 year)

More Related