1 / 5

Action Plan for Making Monitoring and Evaluation More Participatory

Sierra Leone Consortium for Relief and Development (CORAD) CARE Int., AFRICARE, Catholic Relief Services, World Vision Int. Action Plan for Making Monitoring and Evaluation More Participatory. What Needs to Change.

evonne
Télécharger la présentation

Action Plan for Making Monitoring and Evaluation More Participatory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sierra Leone Consortium for Relief and Development (CORAD)CARE Int., AFRICARE, Catholic Relief Services, World Vision Int. Action Plan for Making Monitoring and Evaluation More Participatory

  2. What Needs to Change Program Monitoring and Evaluation needs to change from being “accountability-focused” to facilitating learning by all stakeholders. • Monitoring and evaluation should be made more participatory, and should (to the extent possible) involve all key stakeholders. Specifically, target communities, community health workers, Government extension workers, district health and agricultural management teams, Ministry of Health and Sanitation and Ministry of Agric. Food Security and Forestry should play an active role in monitoring the performance of the CORAD program • The Role of the M&E Coordination Unit (managed by World Vision) should change from “ ensuring standardization and compliance for accountability” to a more “facilitative role” that builds the necessary capacity at levels and “maximizes learning” by all major stakeholders

  3. Sessions Overview of our results framework Startup and operational progress (lessons learned and progress) Review of key components of our health strategy (activities, progress, effectiveness, relevance, impact, and sustainability, challenges , solutions and responsibilities) Review of key components of our Agricultural strategy (activities, progress, effectiveness, relevance, impact, and sustainability, challenges , solutions and responsibilities) Review our M&E approach, in order to determine the M&E info needs of the different stakeholders, assess current challenges and solutions moving forward). The major outcome of this session will be consensus on how to make M&E more participatory and maximize learning Discuss FY 2004 baseline findings and plan FY 2005 activities (agree upon key activities, targets and responsibilities) Summary of key agreements Moving ForwardDec 05-Jan 15 (Planning the FY 2004 annual Review Meeting)

  4. Methods • A combination of “ facilitated sessions”, focus group discussions, group exercises, open discussions, (and a field tour of the nearest supported communities) • The selection of methods will depend on participants invited and their capacity

More Related