1 / 16

DEAT DONOR STRATEGY

DEAT DONOR STRATEGY. NOVEMBER 2006. DEAT DONOR STRATEGY. AIM OF THE STRATEGY To have a more strategic and focused bilateral donor engagement that is DEAT driven and contributes to achieving our strategic objectives and priorities. DEAT BILATERAL ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY MATRIX.

ewa
Télécharger la présentation

DEAT DONOR STRATEGY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DEAT DONOR STRATEGY NOVEMBER 2006

  2. DEAT DONOR STRATEGY AIM OF THE STRATEGY • To have a more strategic and focused bilateral donor engagement that is DEAT driven and contributes to achieving our strategic objectives and priorities.

  3. DEAT BILATERAL ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY MATRIX The donor strategy matrix has been developed with a view to addressing the following two focus areas: • The countries • Specific sectoral areas of cooperation.

  4. DEAT DONOR STRATEGY MATRIX COUNTRIES In determining the countries to cooperate with we looked at: • Strategic political priorities of South Africa, • The technical expertise available in these countries • The financial and technical resources we are able to mobilize through development assistance. The following countries have been identified. • Australasia - Japan, Australia, New Zealand • North America – USA • Europe - Norway, Denmark, Germany, Finland, UK, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Switzerland and the European Union

  5. DEAT DONOR STRATEGY MATRIX RECIPIENT DONOR FUNDING – PROBLEMS • Programmes and projects are seen as separate processes from the normal core functions of DEAT - Not integrated into DEAT strategic plan. • Too project orientated with no coherent programmatic approach. • Funding the donors priorities or pet projects of officials. • No coherent financing packages are being developed, lack of effective utilization of total resources available and a lack of leveraging new resources such as private sector. • No clear programme/project champions and constant changes of programme/project managers. • No effective engagement with provinces, NGO’s etc in developing a coherent programme. • Donor funding has been unpredictable, uncertain and unsustainable.

  6. DEAT DONOR STRATEGY MATRIX RECIPIENT DONOR FUNDING – CRITERIA Donor funding is based on a finite period and also dependent on external and internal factors - Donor country’s economic situation, global influences (War on terrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq) and new governments (Denmark). Donor funding should be utilized: • To fund short term initiatives • As start-up capital to leverage other resources • To fund initiatives which, if not fully implemented as a result of termination of funding, would not be a major obstacle to South Africa achieving its strategic objectives

  7. DEAT DONOR STRATEGY MATRIX RECIPIENT DONOR FUNDING – NICHE GENERIC AREAS • Research and development • Knowledge management systems • Planning systems • Communication/ awareness raising • Training and capacity building

  8. SECTORAL AREAS OF COOPERATION – EQ&P COUNTRIES: • Norway, Denmark, Germany, USA, Finland, UK, France, Netherlands, EU, Belgium, Switzerland AREAS OF COOPERATION • Policy formulation and implementation of waste management including recycling and waste minimisation. • Technical assistance – Air quality modelling and emission standard setting • Compliance and Enforcement • Climate Change – Adaptation, Renewable energy, Technology development (In collaboration with Dept of Science and Technology), Integration of climate information into government planning and disaster management, Greenhouse gas inventory/ systems, Health (In collaboration with Dept of Health), Transport • Chemicals – Remediation (Asbestos) • Sustainable consumption and production (Best Practice)

  9. SECTORAL AREAS OF COOPERATION – TOURISM COUNTRIES: • Spain, Japan, EU, Germany, France AREAS OF COOPERATION • Capacity Building and SMME Development • Business training for entrepreneurs • Language training • 2010 Soccer World Cup • Eco-tourism • Joint marketing Initiatives

  10. SECTORAL AREAS OF COOPERATION – B&C COUNTRIES: • Norway, EU, Grmany (GTZ) AREAS OF COOPERATION • Biodiversity Act and NBSAP – Implementation; Monitoring and evaluation; Bioregional plans (Expanded) • Expansion of protected areas • Access and benefit sharing

  11. SECTORAL AREAS OF COOPERATION – MCM COUNTRIES: • Norway, France, New Zealand, USA AREAS OF COOPERATION • Fisheries management capacity • Scholarships and training • Fisheries research, Socio-economic research and Scientific capacity • Monitoring, control and surveillance • Straddling fish stocks • Marine Pollution • Small scale and subsistence fisheries • Aquaculture • Marine Protected Areas (incl protected areas beyond national boundaries) • Large Marine Eco-systems

  12. SECTORAL AREAS OF COOPERATION – ENV GOV & SUS DEV COUNTRIES: • Norway, Denmark, Finland, Uk, Germany, France, AREAS OF COOPERATION • Environmental planning and governance - Integrated environmental planning and reporting framework; SOER • Sustainable Development - Policy capacity; SD indicators; Capacity to integrate SD objectives in IDPs; Awareness raising

  13. SOUTH AFRICA’S DONOR PORTFOLIO • Norway - Marine fisheries (NOK 40 million over 5 years) and Environment (Pollution and Waste, Biodiversity, Environmental Governance) (NOK 40 million over 5 years) • Denmark (DKK 220 million over 5 years) - Air quality; Waste management; Energy; Mainstreaming environment into administration and planning; Knowledge creation; Civil society and the private sector • Germany (GTZ) - Community based natural resource (Euro 1 million till Dec 2007) • Finland - Funding to the North West Province Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Environment to support environment and sustainable development in the North West. (Euro 2.4 million for period 2006-2008) • European Union – Pollution and waste management, natural resource management, climate change, tourism (New Programme 2007 – 2013 approx Euro 30 million)

  14. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY PORTFOLIO • South Africa is both recipient of GEF resources (approx US$ 100 million) and donor to the GEF 4th Replenishment (Contribution of SDR 4 million = R 38 million over 4 years) • GEF 4th Replenishment = US$ 3.13 billion (4 years) • Biodiversity (US$ 1 billion) • Climate Change (US$ 1 billion) • International Waters (US$ 355 million) • POPs (US$ 300 million) • Land Degradation and Desertification (US$ 300 million) • Ozone (US$ 40 million) • Under the new GEF resource allocation system countries have been provided with an indicative allocation for biodiversity and climate change. The South African allocations are as follows: • Biodiversity (US$ 22,5 million) • Climate Change (US$ 23.9 million)

  15. SOUTH AFRICA’S GEF PORTFOLIO South African Project Portfolio (Some of the key projects) • Development and Implementation of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (BSAP) in South Africa. (US$ 409 000) • Maloti-Drakensberg Conservation and Development Project – Africa, Regional (US$ 15,548 million) • Cape Action Plan for the People and Environment (CAPE): (US$ 11,32 million) • South Africa Wind Energy Programme (SAWEP) Phase I (US$ 2,295 million) • Market Transformation through Energy Efficiency Standards and Labelling of Appliances in South Africa (US$ 6 million) • Sustainable Public Transport and Sport: a 2010 Opportunity (US$ 11,197 million) • Integrated Management of the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem (BCLME) – Africa, Regional (US$ 15,458 million) • The African Stockpile Programme (ASP): Funding the Prevention and Disposal of Obsolete Pesticides from African Countries – Africa, Regional (US$ 25,7 million) • Sub-project 1st Group/Plug Power - under the Global Fuel Cells Financing Initiative for Distributed Generation Applications (Phase 1) (US$ 3,275 million)

  16. THANK YOU

More Related