1 / 18

Federation of Chiropractic Licensing boards May 7, 2005 James Winterstein, D.C. President

Federation of Chiropractic Licensing boards May 7, 2005 James Winterstein, D.C. President National University of Health Sciences. What Happens After the DC Degree? Board Recognition of Post-professional Education and Credentials. How should Doctors of Chiropractic

eyal
Télécharger la présentation

Federation of Chiropractic Licensing boards May 7, 2005 James Winterstein, D.C. President

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Federation of Chiropractic Licensing boards May 7, 2005 James Winterstein, D.C. President National University of Health Sciences

  2. What Happens After the DC Degree? Board Recognition of Post-professional Education and Credentials

  3. How should Doctors of Chiropractic present their post-professional education so as not to mislead the public? The term “chiropractic” should be included in the title - eg. chiropractic radiologist etc.

  4. Certificates of completion and or diplomate status should be displayed. In years past, the “mother” organization which gave the credential status was the ACA. That has changed.

  5. Some chiropractic post-professional boards are seeking approval by the National Association for Competency Assurance (NOCA) and its National Commission for Certifying Agencies (NCCA)

  6. The question we must ask, is; “Who recognized NOCA?” What governmental agency gives it status? As far as I can tell, it is not recognized by USDE.

  7. Boards and specialty recognition In my opinion, the FCLB should work with educational institutions and the ACA to determine which certifying agencies are grounded in legitimate educational processes.

  8. Our profession should have specialty education and related recognition - I think it does expand scope of practice and when the education is obtained through legitimate sources, should be recognized.

  9. When it comes to public perception who knows the answers? To my knowledge, no public survey has been done so it is doubtful they can distinguish between the certificate courses and the diplomate courses.

  10. There is an allopathic/osteopathic model for this situation. We should either adopt that model or move to recognized academic degrees so the public will understand. E.G. National’s Master of Science in radiology and in family practice.

  11. Board eligible vs. board certified is an issue that is used to distinguish those who are ready to take the boards from those who have successfully passed them. In allopathy, these terms are used however there is a time limit for eligibility - usually two years.

  12. Distance education is here to stay. It is not yet fully developed but is rapidly becoming so. We recognize it as part of the future. It will not replace regular classes but should be recognized in my opinion.

  13. Special requirements for CME - Fundamentally, I dislike statutory language and we are a profession that resists the obvious so often that state boards resort to fostering new laws that are restrictive.

  14. We must reach the point at which we make certain ethical issues a matter of PROFESSIONAL conduct rather than attempting to control by law-making.

  15. Comparable examples - Most state laws do not require more than 2 years of undergraduate ed for entrance into Med school - but 97%=+ of med students have the baccalaureate. It is a matter of good educational procedure so statutory language is not necessary.

  16. Most medical specialties are well controlled by the specialty organizations, therefore no need for statutory language.

  17. State laws in general, governing allopathic medicine are quite similar across the country - ours are not.

  18. The models of operation are out there - we should use them instead of trying to invent new ones and, in the process, further entangle ourselves.

More Related