1 / 22

The 5/2 Edge

The 5/2 Edge. IPAM meeting on Topological Quantum Computing February 26- March 2, 2007. MPA Fisher, with Paul Fendley and Chetan Nayak. Motivation: FQHE: Only known topological phases in nature, 5/2 state is the best non-Abelian candidate

eze
Télécharger la présentation

The 5/2 Edge

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The 5/2 Edge IPAM meeting on Topological Quantum Computing February 26- March 2, 2007 MPA Fisher, with Paul Fendley and Chetan Nayak Motivation: FQHE: Only known topological phases in nature, 5/2 state is the best non-Abelian candidate Chiral edge states are easiest to probe in experiment Can use edges to measure non-abelian statistics with multiple point contacts So: Let’s first try to understand the 5/2 edge and then the physics of a Single Point Contact

  2. FQHE: Filling nu=p/q Odd q is the “rule” - Fermi statistics All (but one?) odd denominator states believed to have quasiparticles with Abelian statistics Even denominator plateau: nu=5/2 Willett et. al. (1987), Eisenstein et. al.(2002), Stormer et. al.(2004) Well formed plateau

  3. Proposed Wavefunction for 5/2 Moore, Read (1991) Greiter, Wen, Wilczek (1992) “Paired” Hall state Pfaffian: Moore/Read = Laughlin x BCS

  4. Physics of p+ip superconductor Bogoliubov deGennes Hamiltonian: Eigenstates in +/- E pairs Spectrum with a gap Excitations: Fermionic quasiparticles above the gap

  5. y p+ip Edge Edge state x p+ip superconductor 2-component spinor tangent to edge Edge Majorana fermion Chiral fermion propagates along edge Edge state encircling a droplet Spinor rotates by 2 pi encircling sample Antiperiodic b.c.

  6. Vortex in p+ip superconductor Single vortex Fermion picks up pi phase around vortex: Changes to periodic b.c.!! E=0 Majorana fermion encircling sample, AND encircling vortex - a “vortex zero mode” Complex fermion: Vortex plus edge makes one q-bit

  7. Vortices have Non-Abelian Statistics Nv vortices vortex: Majorana zero mode: Ground state degeneracy: Nv/2 Qbits Massive degeneracy of E=0 Hilbert space Braid two vortices (eg. i and i+1): Unitary transformation - Ui

  8. “Edge Vortices” Majorana fermion: Pass vortex thru edge: Changes b.c. for Majorana fermion from periodic to antiperiodic Can define “edge vortex” operator:

  9. nu=5/2: Add in charge • Excitations: • Majorana Fermion: charge Q=0 • Vortex: charge e/4, non-Abelian • Double vortex: charge e/2, Abelian semion (Laughlin quasiparticle) charge e/4 signature of pairing

  10. 5/2 Edge Charged edge plasmon as in Laughlin Neutral Majorana as in p+ip Edge Operators • Majorana fermion: • vortex: • double vortex: Electron: Pair:

  11. Probing the edge • Electron tunneling into edge from “metal” “charge” “neutral” Edge electron • Shot noise for hc/2e vortex backscattering at point contact • Crossover from weak to strong (vortex) backscattering thru point contact??? ? Fendley/MPAF/Nayak PRL (2006) + PRB

  12. Weak constriction in p+ip Inter-edge Vortex tunneling: Perturbation expansion and Chiral decomposition: “Fusion channels”: Determine fusion channels using: together with braiding rules: Formal (!) perturbation expansion:

  13. Need clever bookkeeping! Define complex coordinate: 4th order in perturbation theory: 6th order in perturbation theory:

  14. p+ip Bosonization Flip direction of left mover: Define complex fermion and bosonize: Lagrangian for boson: Bosonize vortex tunneling Hamiltonian: p+ip point contact is identical to (anisotropic) Kondo model Emergent spin 1/2

  15. 5/2 Bosonization Reinstate the charge edge modes: Flip direction of leftmover, again: Define “odd” charge boson: Bosonize edge Lagrangian and vortex tunneling term: 5/2 point contact is identical to two-channel Kondo model !!

  16. Kondo Crossovers for Point Contact Upon cooling Weak vortex backscattering (UV) Two drops weakly coupled (IR) Thermodynamic Entropy Drop: (“Boundary” entropy change - Ludwig and Affleck) p+ip , Kondo: UV: Unscreened spin 1/2 IR: Fully screened spin nu=5/2, two-channel Kondo:

  17. Entanglement Entropy “Entanglement entropy” between two regions in an infinite sample: D is quantum dimension of the topological phase Thermodynamic (“Boundary”) Entropy drop under point contact crossovers: Thermodynamic Entropy Drop = Entropy of “Disentanglement”

  18. Conclusions: • 5/2 (hopefully!) has non-Abelian quasiparticles • A point contact is complicated due to the particle’s non-trivial braiding statistics. • Dynamically breaking a drop into two is described by the two-channel Kondo model Open issues… • Theory: • Non-equilibrium transport thru point contact (noise and I-V, Keldysh etc) • Multiple point contacts, for topological QC gates • Point contacts in other non-Abelian states, ie Read-Rezayi Experiment: • Measure e/4 charge, signature of pairing • Detect presence of “neutral” edge modes (e-tunneling into edge?) • Measure properties of a point contact • Multiple junctions to detect non-Abelian statistics and build quantum computer!

  19. “Interpretation” of emergent s=1/2 Bosonized representation: Vortex tunneling event, pi/2 phase shift: Subsequent vortex tunneling event, -pi/2 phase shift s=1/2 keeps track of sign changes, spin flip during each tunneling event

  20. Vortex fusion Fuse two vortices: 2 zero modes split: 2 states

  21. Kane/MPAF PRL (1994) Glattli et. al. PRL (1997) Heiblum et. al. Nature (1997)

More Related