170 likes | 322 Vues
This document offers a comprehensive comparison of the key policies and practices among prominent cardiovascular associations, including EHRA, HFA, and EAPCI. It covers aspects such as membership, congress management, publication standards, educational programs, research fellowship opportunities, accreditation processes, and financial operations. Special attention is given to the unique management structure of EAPCI, emphasizing its relationship with European organizations and financial arrangements. This analysis serves as a resource for understanding the landscape of cardiovascular associations and their collaborative efforts.
E N D
Comparison of Associations’ policies • Membership • Congresses • Journals • Research/Fellowship grants • Websites • Accreditation • Educational programmes • Publications • Industry cooperation • Finances
Congresses *EAPCI is special since the congress is managed by European Organisation and the association itself is not paying. In return, the Association receives a predetermined annual payment from Europa.
Comparison of Associations’ policies • Membership • Congresses • Journals • Research/Fellowship grants • Websites • Accreditation • Educational programmes • Publications • Industry cooperation • Finances
Brand Congress and Journal content ESC Web Department