1 / 15

Efficiency of Algorithms

Efficiency of Algorithms. Csci 107 Lecture 7. Last time Data cleanup algorithms and analysis (1), (n), (n 2 ) Today Binary search and analysis (lg n) Sorting Selection sort. Searching. Problem: find a target in a list of values Sequential search Best-case : (1) comparison

faith
Télécharger la présentation

Efficiency of Algorithms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Efficiency of Algorithms Csci 107 Lecture 7

  2. Last time • Data cleanup algorithms and analysis • (1), (n), (n2) • Today • Binary search and analysis • (lg n) • Sorting • Selection sort

  3. Searching • Problem: find a target in a list of values • Sequential search • Best-case : (1) comparison • target is found immediately • Worst-case: (n) comparisons • Target is not found • Average-case: (n) comparisons • Target is found in the middle • Can we do better? • No…unless we have the input list in sorted order

  4. Searching a sorted list • Problem: find a target in a sorted list • How can we exploit that the list is sorted, and come up with an algorithm faster than sequential search in the worst case? • How do we search in a phone book? • Can we come up with an algorithm? • Check the middle value • If smaller than target, go right • Otherwise go left

  5. Binary search • Get values for list, A1, A2, ….An, n , target • Set start =1, set end = n • Set found = NO • Repeat until ?? • Set m = middle value between start and end • If target = m then • Print target found at position m • Set found = YES • Else if target < Am then end = m-1 Else start = m+1 • If found = NO then print “Not found” • End

  6. Efficiency of binary search • What is the best case? • What is the worst case? • Initially the size of the list in n • After the first iteration through the repeat loop, if not found, then either start = m or end = m ==> size of the list on which we search is n/2 • Every time in the repeat loop the size of the list is halved: n, n/2, n/4,…. • How many times can a number be halved before it reaches 1?

  7. Orders of magnitude • Order of magnitude ( lg n) • Worst-case efficiency of binary search: ( lg n) • Comparing order of magnitudes (1) << (lg n) << (n) << (n2)

  8. Sorting • Problem: sort a list of items into alphabetical or numerical order • Why sorting? • Sorting is ubiquitous (very common)!! • Examples: • Registrar: Sort students by name or by id or by department • Post Office: Sort mail by address • Bank: Sort transactions by time or customer name or accound number … • For simplicity, assume input is a list of n numbers • Ideas for sorting?

  9. Selection Sort • Idea: grow a sorted subsection of the list from the back to the front 5 7 2 1 6 4 8 3 | 5 7 2 1 6 4 3 |8 5 2 1 6 4 3 | 7 8 5 2 1 3 4 | 6 7 8 … |1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

  10. Selection Sort • Pseudocode (at a high level of abstraction) • Get values for n and the list of n items • Set marker for the unsorted section at the end of the list • Repeat until unsorted section is empty • Select the largest number in the unsorted section of the list • Exchange this number with the last number in unsorted section of list • Move the marker of the unsorted section forward one position • End

  11. Selection Sort • Level of abstraction • It is easier to start thinking of a problem at a high level of abstraction • Algorithms as building blocks • We can build an algorithm from “parts” consisting of previous algorithms • Selection sort: • Select largest number in the unsorted section of the list • We have seen an algorithm to do this last time • Exchange 2 values

  12. Selection Sort Analysis • Iteration 1: • Find largest value in a list of n numbers : n-1 comparisons • Exchange values and move marker • Iteration 2: • Find largest value in a list of n-1 numbers: n-2 comparisons • Exchange values and move marker • Iteration 3: • Find largest value in a list of n-2 numbers: n-3 comparisons • Exchange values and move marker • … • Iteration n: • Find largest value in a list of 1 numbers: 0 comparisons • Exchange values and move marker Total: (n-1) + (n-2) + …. + 2 + 1

  13. Selection Sort • Total work (nb of comparisons): • (n-1) + (n-2) + …. + 2 + 1 • This sum is equal to .5n2 -.5n (proved by Gauss) => order of magnitude is ( ? ) • Questions • best-case, worst-case ? • we ignored constants, and counted only comparisons.. Does this make a difference? • Space efficiency • extra space ?

  14. Selection Sort • In conclusion: Selection sort • Space efficiency: • No extra space used (except for a few variables) • Time efficiency • There is no best-case and worst-case • the amount of work is the same: (n2) irrespective of the input • Other sorting algorithms? Can we find more efficient sorting algorithms?

  15. This week… • Tuesday: Lab 4 • Exam 1 (Wednesday or Monday?) • Material: Algorithms • Chapter 1, 2 & 3 from textbook • For next time • Binary search • Review chapter 1,2 & 3 • Practice exam

More Related