1 / 10

SUBMISSION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE: Children’s Second Amendment Bill:

SUBMISSION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE: Children’s Second Amendment Bill: B 14---2015 Rene Ferreira , on behalf of NACSA. MISSION IMPOSSIBLE?.

fajardo
Télécharger la présentation

SUBMISSION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE: Children’s Second Amendment Bill:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SUBMISSION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE: Children’s Second Amendment Bill: B 14---2015 Rene Ferreira, on behalf of NACSA

  2. MISSION IMPOSSIBLE? • Since the advent of the Children’s Act in 2005, adopting a child in South Africa has become a bit like a Mission impossible adventure set in the Big Brother house: it is the ultimate 'against the odds' undertaking but also characterised by invasive scrutiny, and weeks and months that pass where absolutely nothing happens. • Thanks to the perseverance of adoptive parents — which could put even Tom Cruise to shame — these quests mostly have a happy ending. But the excessively challenging, mind-numbingly bureaucratic, and often adversarial adoption process is the chief basis for the halving of adoption figures in the last 10 years from 2,840 in 2004 to 1,448 in 2014. This is a dismal figure in a country with approximately 3.5-million orphans, many in need of adoption. So why was a recent headline in the press 'Adoptions to be cheaper, easier' received with such little fanfare and even dismay by the adoption community?  By ROBYN WOLFSON, Daily Maverick – 07/09/2015

  3. Introduction and Background of the National Adoption Coalition of South Africa (hereafter referred to as NACSA) Established in 2011 Representing 64% of the adoption community (Designated CPO’s, accredited adoption social workers, adoptive parents and other stakeholders) Main focus: Promoting awareness and understanding of adoption Building partnership and share ethical practise through training and capacity building Lobbying on behalf of adoption community Developing a code of conduct, sharing and promoting best practise guidelines

  4. Adoptions are acknowledged as an area of speciality • Practise guidelines - DSD • Social Services Professions Act – Speciality since 1992 Registered with the SACSSP & at least 3 years adoption experience • Children’s Act 38 of 2005: Section 251 prescribe accreditation National Norms and Standards of Regulations: Training, support & supervision • National Adoption Strategy – Complex nature of adoption require experience of adoption triad and societal attitudes towards adoption • Accreditation Guidelines for Adoption Service Providers: Competent and experienced • Hague Convention - Professional Competence & extensive experience SO HOW CAN WE DISAGREE?

  5. Adoption: An ethical minefield of complexities - altering the destiny and future life of all parties involved Judgement, Loss, life long Implications, guilt, Role of culture Loss, fear of rejection, suitability vs eligibility Loss of birth family, Change in status, language, identity? Complex ethical issues: • Rights terminated • Fees prescribed • Role of Culture • Time frame Represent the rights of all three parties, focusing on the best interest of child

  6. The Challenge: Different Categories and Structures • Child Protection Services • DSD Adoption Accreditation Criteria • Organisation Structure & Auditing • Resources and Training • Monitored by DSD • Prescribed Fees (Reg 107) • Policies and Procedures • Limited Funding - Audited Accredited CPO’s DSD Adoption Social Workers • Child Protection Services • Organisation Structure • Full subsidy – Fees? • Independent accreditation? • Referee and player? • Resources? • Generic Case loads? • Passion and experience? • DSD Accredited • Speciality Registration, adoption unit • Not monitored and audited by DSD • Act omit to regulate fees – Reg 107/Sec 249 • Not able to render Statutory services

  7. The Current State of Adoptions in SA • Decline in the number of Adoptions registered: • 50% decline since 2004 • Increase: Abandonment & pregnancy • Accessibility of services: Rural areas • Specialty and Fees Delays: From 30 Sec 239 Adoption Registration Grey Areas: Adoption Fees Monitoring of service providers: Different Categories Accreditation Policy and guidelines ADOPTION Poor inter -sectorial collaboration: Justice, Home Affairs, Health Lack of trained adoption social workers: Exposed, limited resources, supervision and capacity building?

  8. Conclusion • The hope of Government in the planned amendment to the Children's Act is to simplify the complicated and lengthy adoption process in South Africa. But the part of the process it is trying to fix is not broken, and there is no evidence that this amendment will fix those parts of the process that are. No one disagrees that more social workers are needed for adoptions, but ............. IT IS CLEAR THAT WE CANNOT AFFORD TO FURTHER COMPROMIZE ON THE STANDARD OF ADOPTION IN SA NACSA aims to be part of the solution for adoption in SA, and therefor is in full support of the Amendment to the definition of adoption social worker to ensure accessibility of adoption services, but is not of the opinion that a new category of service providers without the necessary accreditation (section 251), expertise and monitoring is the only solution

  9. Recommendation: In light of intensive consulting with various adoption stakeholders, the following recommendations are respectfully made: • An addition to the definition of “adoption social worker” as proposed • Additional amendment of Section 251 to address independent accreditation of specific adoption units within DSD • In support of this principal, and within the context of existing structures providing some safe guard within DSD and Organisations, it can be reasoned that these two categories of adoption service providers should not be required to meet the very stringent requirement for speciality as set by the Social Services Professions Act • Rather these two categories should be required to meet the same conditions and criteria as set by the existing guidelines of the accreditation of service providers

  10. THANK YOU

More Related