1 / 21

CBER Introduction to license application:

CBER Introduction to license application:. Aventis Pasteur license application for Meningococcal (groups A, C, Y, and W135) Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine. Trade name: Menactra. Tetravalent Meningococcal Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine, Menactra.

fauna
Télécharger la présentation

CBER Introduction to license application:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CBER Introduction to license application: Aventis Pasteur license application for Meningococcal (groups A, C, Y, and W135) Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine Trade name: Menactra

  2. Tetravalent Meningococcal Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine, Menactra Application received: December 17, 2003 as an e-BLA This is the first meningococcal conjugate submittedfor licensure in the USA . Proposed indication:Active immunization of adolescents and adults ( 11 to 55 yr of age) forprevention of invasive disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroups A, C, Y and W135

  3. Tetravalent Meningococcal Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine, Menactra Vaccine is formulated to contain per 0.5 ml dose • 4 mg of polysaccharide - serogroup A • 4 mg of polysaccharide - serogroup C • 4 mg of polysaccharide - serogroup Y • 4 mg of polysaccharide - serogroup W135 • Approx. 48 mg of diphtheria toxoid • 0.6 mg sodium phosphate • 4.4 mg sodium chloride

  4. For approval of a new vaccine it must be shown to be both safe and effective Concerning the effective requirement: 21 CFR 601.25 (d) Standards for safety, effectiveness and labeling Proof of effectiveness shall consist of controlled clinicalinvestigations as defined in 314.126, unless this requirementis waived on the basis of a showing that it is not reasonablyapplicable to the biological product and that an alternative method of investigation is adequate to substantiate effectiveness Continued >>>

  5. 21 CFR 601.25 (d) Standards for safety, effectiveness and labeling Alternate methods, such as serological response evaluation inclinical studies and other laboratory evaluations may be adequate to substantiate effectiveness where a previouslyaccepted correlation between data generated in this way andclinical effectiveness already exists.

  6. “Non-inferiority designs are used to evaluateefficacy indirectly when placebo-controlled ‘efficacy’ designs are not feasible. Thus, non-inferiority assessments are really indirect efficacy evaluations.” FDA/CBER Biostatistics

  7. Tetravalent Meningococcal Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine, Menactra Existing polysaccharide vaccine: There is an existing licensed tetravalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine, Menomune,for use in the same age indication. The licensing strategy taken by Aventis Pasteur was therefore to show that Menactra was not inferior to Menomune in terms of immunogenicity and safety.

  8. The licensing strategy to show that Menactra is not inferior to Menomune in terms of immunogenicity and safety has been used in the approval of Haemophilus polysaccharide based vaccines Approval Date Vaccine December 1987Haemophilus b conjugate (PRP-D) was approved for same indication as the previously approved polysaccharide vaccine March 1993Haemophilus b conjugate (PRP-T) was approved as a third Hib conjugate vaccine

  9. Use of immunological correlates of protection The September 1999 VRBPAC presentation:“Use of immunologic surrogates for demonstration of protective efficacy of meningococcal conjugate vaccines” The committee concluded that immunological correlates can be used to demonstrate protective efficacy of meningococcal conjugate vaccines for those 2 years of age and older.

  10. Immunological correlates of protection: During the IND process CBER and Aventis Pasteur agreed upon the path to be taken to demonstrate the effectiveness of Menactra. This path was based in part upon an historical perspective:1. How the polysaccharide vaccine was licensed2. What is known about immunological correlates of protection.

  11. Meningococcal Polysaccharide VaccinesAn Historical Prospective

  12. Meningococcal Polysaccharide VaccinesAn Historical Prospective Adapted from Sippel, Crit.Rev.Microbiol. 8:267, 1981

  13. Meningococcal Polysaccharide VaccinesAn Historical Prospective Adapted from Sippel, Crit.Rev.Microbiol. 8:267, 1981

  14. The critical role of bactericidal antibodies in protection against meningococcal disease has been demonstrated in a number of ways • Studies in the US Army recruits in the 1960’s showed a direct correlation between susceptibility to meningococcal disease and absence of serum bactericidal antibodies. • The highest incidence of meningococcal disease occurs in infants between 6 months and 12 months of age. They have the lowest bactericidal antibody concentrations. • Individuals deficient in serum complement components C5, C6 C7, or C8 have markedly increased susceptibility to systemic meningococcal disease, and have repeated meningococcal infections. Thus, bactericidal antibody is a surrogate for protective efficacy

  15. Highest incidence of meningococcal meningitisoccurs at lowest bactericidal antibody prevalence Disease Bactericidalantibody Ref: Goldscneider et al J Exp Med 127: 1969

  16. Protection is afforded by naturally acquired bactericidal antibodies Goldschneider et al. J. Exp. Med. 129:1307, 1969

  17. Bactericidal activity in an Army recruit populationand susceptibility to group C meningococcal disease 492 recruits in at Fort Dix, NJ – 1968 438 had bactericidal antibody - No disease 54 were initially lacked bactericidal antibody Fate of the initially bactericidal negative individuals 24 became exposed to the group C epidemic strain 11 developed bactericidal antibody - No disease 13 failed to develop bactericidal antibody 5/13 – group C meningococal disease(38.5 % attack rate) Goldschneider et al. J. Exp. Med. 129:1307, 1969

  18. The bactericidal assay: Historical Prospective • Human SBA with intrinsic C’ source • Serum diluted 1:4 • Pos/neg assay correlated with protection or susceptibility • W.H.O. Tech. Rep. Ser. 594:51, 1976 • Paired sera taken immediately prior and 2-4 wks after immunization • SBA performed with baby rabbit sera as C’ source and titer expressed as the reciprocal of the dilution with  50% killing • Titers of the sera from at least 90% of the subjects should show a fourfold or greater rise after immunization

  19. Tetravalent Meningococcal Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine, Menactra Primary immunogenicity endpoint for Menactra: Determine percent of vaccinees having a 4-fold or greater increase in bactericidal antibodyfor Menactra compared to Menomune Baby rabbit serum was used as the source of complement

  20. Tetravalent Meningococcal Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine, Menactra As part of the review process CBER investigators conducteda pre-license inspection of Aventis Pasteur manufacturing facility in Swiftwater, Pennsylvania . The inspectional findings were satisfactory

  21. Focus of today’s CBER presentations First: Dr. Lucia Lee, M.D. will provide the CBER clinicalreview of safety and efficacy Second: I will present two questions for the committee to voteupon and an additional two items for discussion and comment

More Related