1 / 15

Introduction

Introduction. We consider the data of ~1800 phenotype measurements Each mouse has a given probability distribution of descending from one of 8 possible strains We model where Y is phenotype, X – “genotype” matrix, π – probability of descending from strains, z – flanking markers

faustus-marlas
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction We consider the data of ~1800 phenotype measurements Each mouse has a given probability distribution of descending from one of 8 possible strains We model where Y is phenotype, X – “genotype” matrix, π – probability of descending from strains, z – flanking markers The objective is to estimate β’s and to test for

  2. Approaches Linear regression replace the true design matrix with E(X) and the estimator is given by - estimator is unbiased - normally distributed - linear in Y - has large variance due to collinearity

  3. Approaches (2) Maximum likelihood estimator Maximize with respect to β: - expression simplifies - easy to evaluate point-wise - functional form not known, hence difficult to optimize - properties of the MLE are unknown

  4. Approaches (3)Use a stochastic optimiser for finding MLE: the EM The two steps are: E-step, calculate for i-th mouse (only for categorical covariates) M-step, maximize Q w.r.t. β Advantages: Automatic Fast Approximate distribution of estimates allows to perform testing Easily generalised to GLM

  5. Implementation of the EM M-step becomes equivalent to a Weighted Least Squares or a weighted GLM model (fitting routines available in R and Matlab): Where Y and X are augmented matrices, the weights matrix constructed using HMM output. Below there are only results for normal distribution of Y but the EM was applied to the binomial and exponential cases as well.

  6. Augmenting the model Given the phenotypes Y and the weights W we create the model: with corresponding weights

  7. Simulated example: generated phenotypes Response generated for set variance 0.3 and β = (1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0)

  8. Running the EM Values of β parameters at the EM iterations. The real values are (1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0).

  9. Running time 10 seconds - approximate running time for the WLS case - on 1,649 mice - implemented in Matlab - with convergence achieved at 15 iterations for some starting points 60 seconds - For 3,298 mice

  10. Testing Likelihood ratio test performed for the EM linear regression with known design matrix linear regression with the expectation of design matrix. under collinearity

  11. Empirical null distributions • EM algorithm null distribution E(X) case null distribution

  12. Power curves Description of the power of the LR test All β’s set to 0 except first one Simulate data sets and plot number of rejections For each value of β 500 simulations were performed

  13. Simulated power curves Randomly drawn combination of progenitor strains Least likely combination of progenitor strains Most likely combination of progenitor strains

  14. Data Considered OpenArmTime phenotype ~200 mice have zero records and were removed Is it a mixture of normal distributions?

  15. Future development Time to event models - Censored data - Cox proportional hazards model Bayesian models Implementation in R Models for multivariate phenotypes Multiple hypothesis testing HMM improvement

More Related