1 / 16

Digital Participation at the End of Life

Digital Participation at the End of Life. Rachid Hourizi, Wendy Moncur, Tony Walter. Introduction . End of Life Barriers to Digital Participation Reducing Barriers Research Directions. Projected UK longevity in 2030. Leadbeter, C. and Garber, J. Dying well . DEMOS, London, UK, 2010.

fauve
Télécharger la présentation

Digital Participation at the End of Life

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Digital Participation at the End of Life Rachid Hourizi, Wendy Moncur, Tony Walter

  2. Introduction • End of Life • Barriers to Digital Participation • Reducing Barriers • Research Directions

  3. Projected UK longevity in 2030 Leadbeter, C. and Garber, J. Dying well. DEMOS, London, UK, 2010.

  4. Decline • End of Life (EoL) likely to be preceded by: • Physical / cognitive decline • Multiple conditions • At EoL, majority of people will be in a care institution* • 60% in hospital • 17% in a care home • 5% in a hospice • Only 18% at home • Physical/ cognitive decline accompanied by social decline • Yet social contact remains important *Leadbeter, C. and Garber, J. Dying well. DEMOS, London, UK, 2010.

  5. Staying connected • Can the “transformational impact of digital technologies on… community life”* alleviate social isolation: • At home? • Carers may also be isolated • In EoL care institutions? • Hospitals • Care homes • Hospices * Research Council UK. What is the RCUK Digital Economy theme? 2011

  6. Staying connected • Individual at EoL may want to communicate with: • Core carers (small group of family/ close friends) • Wider support network • Family • Friends • Neighbours • Colleagues • Health & social care practitioners • Spiritual advisors • Third Sector organizations • Lawyer

  7. Digital Participation at EoL • Web 2.0 resources adopted by some younger users • Used to maintain social connections. E.g.: • Blogs • Online support groups • Social networking sites • But this is unusual • Barriers exists to digital participation at EoL

  8. Barriers: Technology factors • Practical barriers through lack of: • Hardware & software • Broadband access • Technology literacy/ confidence • Majority of people currently at EoL are old  not technology users • But this will change as current technology users age • Support/ mentoring

  9. Barriers: Physical/ Cognitive Constraints • Physical/ cognitive limitations associated with decline • Static • Dynamic • Progressive conditions  changing user profile

  10. Barriers: Stakeholder Interactions • Interaction between core carers and wider support network important • Deliver joined-up support to person at EoL • Healthcare, practical assistance, social/ emotional support • But • Communication often poorly supported • Information scattered • Amongst stakeholders • Online & offline • Information not shared effectively

  11. Barriers: Privacy concerns • One size does not fit all • Need to tailor information provision to different stakeholders • Older people anxious about threat to privacy via Internet • Doctors worry about: • Confidentiality • Physician-patient relationship

  12. Barriers: Organisational culture • ICT use by staff @ EoL care facilities • Admin tool • Technical support provided • ICT use by patients/ residents • Not part of their care • Technical support absent • Perceived risk to moral wellbeing • May be blocked by firewall

  13. Reducing barriers • Quick wins • Easier to circumvent barriers for younger users • Technology literacy • Fewer privacy concerns • Increasing ubiquity & speed of wireless broadband access • Internet access beyond the control of EoL Care Organisations? • Technology-literate users will be the “new old”

  14. Research directions • How can digital participation support social life of those near EoL? • Address identified barriers: • Generate appropriate design practices • Create tools to support digital social participation • Supplement existing practices and tools that circumvent the barriers • Take account of organisational concerns surrounding EoL data protection and privacy.

  15. Research directions • Research in early stages • Currently collaborating with partners in elder care homes and hospices • Gaining deeper understanding of: • Individual/ group interactions that can mitigate social exclusion • How ICT tools can support those interactions, tailored to needs of: • elderly/terminally ill • their core & extended support networks.

  16. Summary • Those at EoL face unwanted social exclusion • Digital participation may reduce exclusion • Barriers exist • Especially in EoL care facilities • We aim to initiate research into how digital participation can: • Support social life of those near EoL • Alleviate social isolation The authors acknowledge the financial support of the EPSRC, grant no. EP/I026304/1.

More Related