1 / 16

Evaluation of the Latent heat nudging scheme for the rainfall assimilation at the meso-gamma scale

Evaluation of the Latent heat nudging scheme for the rainfall assimilation at the meso-gamma scale. Andrea Rossa* and Daniel Leuenberger MeteoS wiss *current affiliation: ARPA Veneto , Centro Meteo Teolo. Motivation. QPF poorest performance area of NWP, especially in summer (convection)

fawzia
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluation of the Latent heat nudging scheme for the rainfall assimilation at the meso-gamma scale

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation of the Latent heat nudging scheme for the rainfall assimilation at the meso-gamma scale Andrea Rossa* and Daniel Leuenberger MeteoSwiss *current affiliation: ARPA Veneto , Centro Meteo Teolo

  2. Motivation • QPF poorest performance area of NWP, especially in summer (convection) • Rainfall assimilation to mitigate spinup effect • Radar observations for high-resolution NWP models • Characteristics of LHN • Buoyancy driven • Computational efficiency • 4DDA, timely assimilation of high-frequency observations • This study: reevaluation of Latent Heat Nudging (LHN) within high-res model using idealised and real radar data arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  3. Idealised Experiments: Setup and Strategy • Model: Local Model (LM) in idealised configuration • Unstable environment supportive for supercell storms • Reference simulation • Surface precipitation for assimilation • 4D fields for validation • Assimilation simulations • Proof of concept with identical twin simulation (CTRL) • Sensitivity to uncertainty in observations and environment arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  4. y z y CTRL + 5 % x x x Reference and CTRL simulation y z y REF x x x RH, W and qe z , W and cold pool total sfc rain arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  5. Delay: 12 min Extrema of w arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  6. Transient phase: 45 min Assimilation increments arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  7. Observation Uncertainty • Amplitude Error • Factor 0.5 (2) results in 88% (133%) of total precipitation • Environment and model dynamics damps error • Temporal resolution • Combined amplitude and structure error • Strong sensitivity • Non-Rain Echoes • Potential strong sensitivity arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  8. Non-Rain Echoes: convective conditions 6h Sum of Model Precipitation 6h Sum of Radar y y arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005 x x

  9. Non-Rain Echoes: AP conditions Vertical mixing due to strong, spurious updrafts w z arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005 t x

  10. Environment Uncertainty • Perfect observations, degraded environment • Low-level Humidity • -4% (4%) error in PBL humidity  -14% (11%) precip. deviation • For slightly drier conditions: convection suppressed • For slightly moister conditions: multi-cell development • Environmental Wind • Can lead to distorted system dynamics arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  11. Uncertainty in the Environment: Error in Wind Bias in environmental wind: +2m/s; assimilation only z y y x x x arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005 Surface precipitation DTLHN, cloud, precip z , W and cold pool

  12. 200 km Case study of 8. May 2003 21 UTC arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  13. CTRL LHN RADAR 17-18 UTC Analysis 21-22 UTC 4h Forecast Simulations with Dx = 2.2km, no CPS arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  14. RADAR RADAR LHN Analysis 1h Forecast 8. May 2003 Storm arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  15. Findings • LHN has good potential for triggering convection • Excellent results in identical twin simulation • Scheme sensitive to observation and environment errors • Non-rain echoes pose serious problem  Data quality • Case study of real storm • LHN triggers storm at right location and intensity • Radar data clearly improves QPF in the first hours • Outflow located too far downstream  position error • Storm kept in model for more than 4h • Storm environment important, particularly PBL! Use mesoscale data assimilation to complement rainfall assimilation (AWS, VAD/radial winds, GPS tomography, PBL profilers) arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

  16. Thank you for your attention ! arossa@arpa.veneto.it WSN05 Toulouse, 5.-9. September 2005

More Related