1 / 9

architectureboard.ph Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA As presented by the

www.architectureboard.ph Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA As presented by the Professional Regulatory Board of Architecture ( PRBoA ) on 30 June 2012. s 1. A. State of the Practice :

feoras
Télécharger la présentation

architectureboard.ph Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA As presented by the

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. www.architectureboard.ph Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA As presented by the Professional Regulatory Board of Architecture (PRBoA) on 30 June 2012 s1

  2. A. State of the Practice : LGU Offices of the Building Official (OBOs) still accept architectural documents prepared by civil engineers (CEs) in clear violation of a valid and subsisting law (RA No. 9266); the CEs and the Court continue to invoke the intercalated (erroneous) text of Sec. 302 of PD No. 1096 (1977 NBCP); 2. The Architects have been reactive and have been playing the CE game all these past 7 years; its time to be proactice/ play our game; s2 Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA,Sat 30 June 2012

  3. A. State of the Practice : 3. Up to 4,500examinees annually for the last 2 years; 51% passing LEA rate over the last 3 years; we are now producing about 2,000 registered architects annually for the last 3 years; 4. About 30,000 registered architects (RAs); only about 13,000 (43%) are registered and licensed architects (RLAs) i.e. IAPOA members; however, while very much capable, most RLAs are still employees or back office support (here and overseas) rather than frontline practitioners; only about 100 RLAs have the actual capability to engage in borderless/ international practice; 5. Only 36 firms are registered architectural firms (RAFs); only about 10 architectural firms have real capabilities to engage in borderless practice; s3 Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA,Sat 30 June 2012

  4. B. Regulation of the Profession : 1. R.A. No. 9266 is a special and later law that is in full effect i.e. valid and subsisting, no TRO/ injunction and no constitutional question on any of its provisions; its full implementation and enforcement has not been stopped by any Court Order; 2. Primary jurisdiction over the architectural profession is with the PRC (and the PRBoA), not with the DPWH nor with the DILG; 3. DPWH is only in charge of the implementation and enforcement of P.D. No. 1096 (1977 NBCP); Sec. 302 of P.D. No. 1096 does NOT state (NEVER stated) that CEs can sign or seal architectural documents; s4 Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA,Sat 30 June 2012

  5. B. Regulation of the Profession : 4. RA No. 9266 Stream of Regulations still incomplete i.e. still lacks Guidelines and Manual of Procedure/ Practice; 5. Continuing Professional Education (CPE) is still a voluntary matter unless superseded by a new law making CPE mandatory; 6. IAPOA certificate still required by the PRC for the renewal of the professional license (PRC ID card); 7. PCAB license is required for RLAs desirous of engaging in construction (under RA No. 4566); s5 Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA,Sat 30 June 2012

  6. B. Regulation of the Profession: 8. It is so much easier to file a case against a RLA than against an illegal practitioner; 9. Administrative Procedures Against RLAs are heard at the PRC; 10. Criminal Complaints re R.A. No. 9266 may be filed at the PRC and endorsed to the Prosecutors Office for later filing of information with the Court; 11. Special Complaints re R.A. No. 9266 may be filed against erring Government officials (Office of the Ombudsman, Presidential Anti-Graft Commission) without going to the PRC. s6 Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA,Sat 30 June 2012

  7. C. Relationship with the IAPOA (UAP): • Matters that Need to be Explicitly Stated: a) the PRBoA is the regulating entity while the IAPOA (UAP) and the RAs/ RLAs are the regulated entity; b) the IAPOA is recognized by the PRBoA and PRC and as such, the PRBoA and PRC may officially look into IAPOA affairs periodically i.e. the PRBoA conducts a periodic review of the IAPOA performance; and c) while the PRBoA needs to periodically consult with the IAPOA for certain concerted actions, the PRBoA does NOT require permission from the IAPOA for it to act; • Periodic consultation with the IAPOA is a consideration for keyPRBoA resolutions; and • The PRBoA fully relies on the IAPOA and its chapters to assist in the monitoring of the implementation and enforcement of R.A. No. 9266 & its stream of regulations. s7 Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA,Sat 30 June 2012

  8. D. Suggested IAPOA Tasking: 1. Finish the Architects’ Guidelines; 2. Work on the Architecture Code of the Philippines (as a Referral Code of the NBCP); 3. Green the Proposed Repeal Version of P.D. No. 1096 (1977 NBCP); Advocacy Program on the NBCP, the Fire Code of the Phils. (FCP), the Accessibility Law, Water Code, environmental laws and the Procurement Law (RA No. 9184); 4. Proactive legislative and legal programs; and 5. IAPOA National Organization and Chapters must become the primary IAPOA and PRBoAliaison entities at the national and LGU levels. s8 Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA,Sat 30 June 2012

  9. www.architectureboard.phThank Youand aPleasant Afternoon to All !!! s17 Issues & Concerns of the PRBoA,Sat 30 June 2012

More Related