1 / 36

Kyla Terhune, MD, Lesly Dossett, MD, MPH Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Surgical ICU Acuity and Volume Compared to Resident Workforce: Before and After the Duty Hour Regulations. Kyla Terhune, MD, Lesly Dossett, MD, MPH Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Background. At Vanderbilt University Medical Center: Appears to be an increase in “demand”

fern
Télécharger la présentation

Kyla Terhune, MD, Lesly Dossett, MD, MPH Vanderbilt University Medical Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Surgical ICU Acuity and Volume Compared to Resident Workforce: Before and After the Duty Hour Regulations Kyla Terhune, MD, Lesly Dossett, MD, MPH Vanderbilt University Medical Center

  2. Background • At Vanderbilt University Medical Center: • Appears to be an increase in “demand” • Aging, sicker, more complex patients • No concomitant increase in residents • July 2003: ACGME restrictions • further decrease in supply

  3. Potential Hypotheses • Scenario 1: • Residents are working fewer hours… • Therefore see fewer patients… • Therefore “work” less hard and learn less… • Scenario 2: • Patient load and acuity have increased… • Even though residents are working fewer hours… • They are busier and working harder during that time.

  4. Literature PRO • Safety unchanged or improved • Morale better • Education improved • No change: operative cases • No change: mortality CON • Safety declined • Attrition higher • Quality of med student education has declined • Significant decline in op cases (assists) • Higher complications

  5. ICU and Work Hours • UT Southwestern (Frankel, H.L., et al. J Trauma, 2006.): • 2003: reallocated residents in SICU to comply w 80 hrs • 2004: SICU readmission rates (RR) doubled • Attributed increased RR to lack of continuity • Targeted intervention to reduce RR • UMDNJ (Gordon, C.R., et al., Am Surg, 2006) • Surveyed programs in order to determine strategies • Found 37% supplement with non-GS housestaff

  6. ICU and Work Hours • Baylor: Trauma ICU • Morrison, C.A., M.M. Wyatt, and M.M. Carrick, J Surg Res, 2009 • National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) • 2001-02 (pre) and 2004-05 (post) • Mortality decreased significantly

  7. Hypotheses • Admissions to surgical ICUs (BICU, TICU, SICU) at VUMC have increased. • Patient acuity (as measured by hospital days and ventilator days) has increased. • Resident complement and work hours in these units have decreased.

  8. Research Questions • How do changes in hospital acuity and volume compare to… resident numbers and work hours in the surgical critical care unit?

  9. Tarpley RPM Metaphor • Remember vinyl records? • 33 1/3 RPM: pre 80-hour workweek • 78 RPM: post 80-hour workweek • My interpretation… Sinatra vs. Chipmunks

  10. Methods: the Demand (Patients) • Admissions • TICU, BICU, SICU • Total initial admissions per month • Acuity • ICU-days per patient • Hospital-days per patient • Ventilator-days per patient (billing charge per 24 h) • Other measures of acuity (APACHE II)

  11. Methods: the Supply (Residents) • Numbers • General Surgery residents • Supplemental residents from other services: • ED residents: TICU • Anesthesia: SICU • OB/Gyn: SICU • Hours

  12. Methods: the Supply (Residents) • 1998-2003 • “We worked 110-120 hours per week.” • 36 hour call (6 am to 6 pm following day) • Non-call: 6 am to 6 pm • Did not assume days off, given unit months, acuity • Call schedule calculated by number of residents at that level • 3 interns: q3 • 2 seniors on trauma: q2

  13. Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri Sat Q2 week: 126 hours Q3 week: 112 hours

  14. Methods: the Supply (Residents) • 2003-2008 • Hours data from department • Missing data (291/3718, 7.8%) • 80 hours (maximum) • Opted for 80: • worked “against” our hypothesis • Maximum they would be “allowed” to work

  15. Comparisons of Pre/Post Hours Regulations • ICU Admissions • ICU days • Hospital Days • Ventilator Days • “Resident Days” (hours/24 hrs/day) • Comparable to total hours

  16. Total ICU Admissions

  17. Total ICU Days

  18. Total Hospital Days

  19. Total Ventilator Days

  20. Total Ventilator Days • Reflect changes in practice • Increase in tracheostomies • Decreased sedation • Spontaneous breathing trials • “Wake up and breathe”

  21. Total Residents on ICU Services

  22. Total Residents on ICU Services • Residents were pulled from other services • Pulled residents from other hospitals • (loss of primarily operative services) • Initiation of closed units in SICU • Dedicated ICU team

  23. Total Resident Days

  24. Total Resident Days • Hours divided by 24 hrs/day • Unit similar to Hospital Days or ICU Days • Total resident days have increased • Increased number of residents in ICUs • But we have “maxed” out our supply

  25. ICU Admissions: Resident Days

  26. ICU Admissions: Resident Days • Comparing post to pre • More ICU admissions per resident days • More new patients and higher census • Slope not increasing • Proper supplementation of numbers of residents • Numbers are maxed out though…

  27. ICU days: Resident days

  28. Ventilator days: Resident days

  29. Ventilator days: Resident days • Residents may be caring for fewer and fewer patients on ventilators • May reflect change in practice • However, still greater ratio in 2008 than in 1998.

  30. Discussion • Are the hours correct? • Carpenter, R.O., et al., Am J Surg, 2006. • Adjustments prior to initiation of 2003 • Physician extenders • Moonlighters

  31. Conclusions • ICU admissions have increased. • ICU length of stay has increased. • There is an overall increase in volume and acuity. • Redistribution of residents to ICU has been appropriate. • But volume is increasing. • Resident capacity is maxed out.

  32. Conclusions • The acuity and volume of work in 2008 during working hours is greater than in 1998.

  33. Conclusions • Critical Care Tower: November 2009 • Need more residents in ICUs? • Critical care track? • Certainly cannot afford to work fewer hours. • Patient safety • Maxed out physician extenders • Educational impact: • Removal from operative services? • Educational programs in the ICU

  34. Acknowledgements • Stephanie Rowe • Allison Watts • Margaret Tarpley • Kelly Dilahuay • Linnea Hauge, PhD • Kim Schenarts, PhD • John Tarpley, MD

More Related