1 / 35

Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi , Harvard Law School Oct 2010

Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi , Harvard Law School Oct 2010. Indian Judiciary. Features. Indian Judiciary. Features. Structure. Indian Judiciary. Features. Structure. Supreme Court. Indian Judiciary. Features. Structure. Supreme Court. Phases. Features of the Indian Judiciary.

field
Télécharger la présentation

Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi , Harvard Law School Oct 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Indian Judiciary Namita Wahi , Harvard Law School Oct 2010

  2. Indian Judiciary Features

  3. Indian Judiciary Features Structure

  4. Indian Judiciary Features Structure Supreme Court

  5. Indian Judiciary Features Structure Supreme Court Phases

  6. Features of the Indian Judiciary Unified Judiciary

  7. Features of the Indian Judiciary Unified Judiciary Power of Judicial Review

  8. Features of the Indian Judiciary Unified Judiciary Power of Judicial Review Judicial Independence

  9. Structure of the Indian Judiciary Supreme Court

  10. Supreme Court of India Namita Wahi, Harvard Law School

  11. Structure of the Indian Judiciary Supreme Court High Courts

  12. Structure of the Indian Judiciary Supreme Court High Courts District Courts

  13. Structure

  14. Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court Original

  15. Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court Original Appellate

  16. Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court Original Appellate Advisory

  17. Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court Original Appellate Advisory Special Leave to Appeal (SLP)

  18. Three phases of the Supreme Court The period from 1950-1970

  19. Three phases of the Supreme Court The period from 1950-1970 The period from 1970-1980

  20. Three phases of the Supreme Court The period from 1950-1970 The period from 1970-1980 The period from 1980-2010

  21. The period from 1950-1970 Land Reform Cases Kameshwar Singh v. State of Bihar (1952)

  22. The period from 1950-1970 Land Reform Cases Kameshwar Singh v. State of Bihar (1952) Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967)

  23. The period from 1970-1980 Before the Emergency Basic Structure Case: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

  24. The period from 1970-1980 Before the Emergency Basic Structure Case: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) The Case That Shook India State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain (1975) (Allahabad High Court)

  25. The period from 1970-1980 Justice JagmohanlalSinha

  26. The period from 1970-1980 During the Emergency Review of the Basic Structure Case (1975)

  27. The period from 1970-1980 During the Emergency Review of the Basic Structure Case (1975) Election Case: Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)

  28. The period from 1970-1980 During the Emergency Review of the Basic Structure Case (1975) Election Case: Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) Habeas Corpus Case: ADM Jabalpur v. Shiv Kant Shukla (1976)

  29. The period from 1970-1980 Justice H.R. Khanna

  30. The period from 1980-2010 Public Interest Litigation

  31. The period from 1980-2009 Public Interest Litigation Social Rights

  32. The period from 1980-2009 Public Interest Litigation Social Rights Policymaking and Legislative power

  33. The period from 1980-2009 Public Interest Litigation Social Rights Policymaking and Legislative power Complete power over judicial appointments

  34. The period from 1980-2009 Public Interest Litigation Social Rights Policymaking and Legislative power Complete power over judicial appointments Lack of coherent public policy

  35. The period from 1980-2009 Public Interest Litigation Social Rights Policymaking and Legislative power Complete power over judicial appointments Lack of coherent public policy Lack of transparency

More Related