1 / 1

Introduction

Hemisphere differences in the time course of phonological and orthographic processes: A backward masking investigation Laura K Halderman & Christine Chiarello University of California, Riverside. Introduction. Results. Conclusions.

finola
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hemisphere differences in the time course of phonological and orthographic processes: A backward masking investigationLaura K Halderman & Christine ChiarelloUniversity of California, Riverside Introduction Results Conclusions • For reaction time, there was a significant 2(SOA: 20ms & 60ms) X 2(Visual Field) X 4(Mask Type) interaction: • F(3,138) = 2.72, MSE = 12573, p < .05 • Previous work has shown the cerebral hemispheres process words differently during pre-lexical moments of word recognition (Halderman & Chiarello, 2005) • RVF/LH - both orthographic and phonological processes are available, however by 30ms, phonological information leads to greater word recognition • LVF/RH - orthographic processing is more robust and enhanced, relative to the RVF/LH • Previous work did not include a condition where phonology was the primary source of similarity • SOA differences were absent possibly because SOA was treated as a between subject variable • Right Visual Field/Left Hemisphere • At 20ms, the effects of orthography and phonology were indistinguishable • O+P+ = O+P- and O+P+ = O-P+ • By 60ms, the effects of both orthography and phonology together were greater than the effects of orthography or phonology alone • O+P+ was faster than O+P- and O-P+ • Left Visual Field/Right Hemisphere • Results were consistent across SOAs • When orthographic similarity was present, phonological similarity did not improve performance • O+P+ = O+P- • However, when phonological similarity was present, orthographic similarity did improve performance • O+P+ was faster than O-P+ Methods Lateralized Backward Masking 20/60ms Discussion 20/60ms • At the shortest SOA, the effects of orthography and phonology are underadditive for the LH. However, the LH can very quickly reach a deeper representation that integrates both sources of information. • Orthographic processes are more effective than phonological processes for the RH. However, if the RH could not process phonology at all, the O-P+ condition should be equivalent to the O-P- condition, suggesting some phonological abilities 20/60ms 20/60ms 300ms ISI 4000ms Relatedness Conditions Acknowledgments This research was partially supported by NIDCD grant 5R01DC6957, awarded to the second author.

More Related