1 / 18

Stratospheric Ozone : Depletion and Recovery

Stratospheric Ozone : Depletion and Recovery. Eun-Su Yang 1 , Ross J. Salawitch 2 , Derek Cunnold 3 , Michael J. Newchurch 1 , M. Patrick McCormick 4 , James Russell III 4 , Joseph Zawodny 5 , Sam Oltmans 6 1 Univ of Ala, Huntsville, 2 Univ of Md, 3 Ga. Tech,

Télécharger la présentation

Stratospheric Ozone : Depletion and Recovery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stratospheric Ozone : Depletion and Recovery Eun-Su Yang1, Ross J. Salawitch2, Derek Cunnold3, Michael J. Newchurch1, M. Patrick McCormick4, James Russell III4, Joseph Zawodny5, Sam Oltmans6 1 Univ of Ala, Huntsville, 2 Univ of Md, 3 Ga. Tech, 4 Hampton University, 5 NASA LaRC, 6 NOAA ESRL Motivation: Ground Based TOMS OMI How much of this “leveling off” in ozone column is due to the “leveling off” of halogens ?

  2. WMO 2007 (Chapter 6) First Stage of Ozone Recovery The occurrence of a statistically significant reduction in the rate of decline of ozone due to changing ozone depleting substances

  3. First Stage of Ozone Recovery – Slowing of Decline 1997 is theCritical Time to look for recovery of Polar Ozone EESC: Equivalent Effective Stratospheric Chlorine 1997

  4. Complication #1 Large year to year variability in temperature

  5. Complication #2 Ozone reaches “zero” over considerable height range. This “saturation effect” may be the cause of the “leveling off” of the column ozone time series NOAA ESRL Ozonesonde Data: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/dv/spo_oz/sondes

  6. September October Extra-Vortex Collar Vortex Equivalent Latitude Equivalent Latitude Data sources: ▪ SAGE II, HALOE, Sondes, Brewer/Dobson ▪ Classify data as vortex, collar, or extra vortex using Equivalent latitude at 440 K (Nash criteria; PV from NCEP reanalysis)

  7. Total Ozone: October, Vortex Core Record Cold Ozone (DU) Early Warming

  8. Scatter plot, Detrended Total O3 vs Detrended Temperature (440 K) : Cold winters associated with larger vortices and less ozone, due to combination of “dynamical effects” and “chemical effects” related to availability of PSCs (Boedeker et al., 2002; Newman et al., 2004; Huck et al., 2005)

  9. Scatter plot, Detrended Total O3 vs Detrended Temperature (440 K) : We use slopes of these curves, together with yearly T residual, to derive Ozone Time Series that account for yearly variations in temperature and dynamics

  10. Total Ozone: October, Vortex Core Record Cold Ozone (DU) Early Warming

  11. Record Cold Ozone (DU) Early Warming Total Ozone: October, Vortex Core ▪ Have dealt with Complication #1 (Meteorology) ▪ Now, must deal with Complication #2 (Loss Saturation)

  12. Difference Attributable to Loss Saturation Loss Saturation, Method #1 : PDFs of Total Column Ozone October vortex core: mean ozone is 13 DU higher during 1994 to 2007 time period than “predicted ozone” found using O3 vs T residual relation from 1979 to 1991 time period September: no discernable saturation effect, in either core or collar October vortex collar: 13 DU effect

  13. Ozonesondes SAGE II Loss Saturation, Method #2 : (O3) vs (T) in layers October vortex core: ozonesonde saturation effect : 10.1 DU (3.1 + 4.3 + 2.7) SAGE II saturation effect: 13.6 DU (5.3 + 4.4 + 3.9 )

  14. Ozonesondes SAGE II Loss Saturation, Method #2 : (O3) vs (T) in layers October vortex core: ozonesonde saturation effect : 10.1 DU (3.1 + 4.3 + 2.7) SAGE II saturation effect: 13.6 DU (5.3 + 4.4 + 3.9 ) Adjust Total Ozone Time series by 13 DU (mean value of loss saturation for 1994 to 2006), with coldest years having larger adjustments

  15. Total Ozone: October, Vortex Core Record Cold Early Warming Polar EESC

  16. Trend Analysis: Sept Core Oct Core Sept Collar Oct Collar

  17. Black: Cumulative Sum of Residuals (i.e., deviation of data from fit) CUSUM Analysis: Sept Core Oct Core Sept Collar Blue dotted: 95% confidence limit Oct Collar

  18. Conclude: ▪ Antarctic Ozone, within both core and collar regions, is in first stage of recovery due to the leveling off of ozone depleting substances ▪ In plain English: chemical loss is not getting any worse (use of word “recovery” seems strange to me, but the community has chosen this word to describe this situation!) ▪ Yearly variations in Antarctic ozone are now driven by meteorology ▪ Cold winters  low ozone ▪ Next stage of recovery (actual improvement in ozone) not likely to occur until middle of next decade (Newman et al., GRL, 2006)

More Related