330 likes | 530 Vues
Tennessee Transit 2025 September 25 Public Meeting Memphis. Tennessee Department of Transportation Organization. Office of Public Transportation What We Do. Transit planning, marketing, and technical assistance Capital/operating assistance Elderly/disabled programs
E N D
Office of Public Transportation What We Do • Transit planning, marketing, and technical assistance • Capital/operatingassistance • Elderly/disabled programs • Ridesharing assistance • Transit system training • Student internship program • Park and ride lot development • Resource coordination
Tennessee Transit Today • 23 transit agencies state-wide • Ridership 29 million in 2001 (up 13.6% since 1998) • $45.6 million - capitalimprovements in 2001 • $106.9 million - operating funds in 2001
In Millions of $$ 2000 2001 2002 2003 State Transit Funding
Metropolitan/Regional Transit RTA Five Systems 25.8 million trips in 2001 660 Total Vehicles in 2001
MATAMemphis Area Transit Authority • Fixed route service • 69 routes, 12.8 million trips • 255 vehicles • Largest system in state • Express buses – 5 routes • Trolley routes – 2 routes • Demand response – 211,004 trips • 48 lift-equipped vehicles • Projects: • Replace 31 vehicles - $6.7 million • Light rail planning and system development
89 Total Vehicles 1.2 million trips in 2001 Urban Transit Systems 6 Systems
44 Total Vehicles 1.4 million trips in 2001 Trolley Systems 3 Systems
Rural Public Transit11 Systems – 95 Counties 649 vehicles • Delta HRA • Northwest TN HRA • Southwest HRA • Mid-Cumberland HRA • South Central TN DD 1.4 million trips in 2001 • Upper Cumberland HRA • Southeast TN HRA • Hamilton County • East TN HRA • Hancock County • First TN HRA
Delta HumanResource Agency • Counties Served: Fayette, Tipton, Lauderdale, andnon-urbanized areas of Shelby • Service Area Population: 107,178 • Trips Provided in FY 2001: 36,733 • Connects with MATA for Job Access
Emerging Transit Markets • Towns become urban – Cleveland, Morristown and Murfreesboro • Service feasibility studies – Murfreesboro and Sevierville • Bus rapid transit study – Gatlinburg, Pigeon Forge and Sevierville
Transit System Issues • Funding • New technology • Capital facilities • Demand for paratransit service rising dramatically • Service development and marketing • Land use planning and development
Transit Benefits(From Oak Ridge National Laboratory) • Access to employment and medical services • Positive economic andenvironmental impacts • Urban transit returns $2.00-2.50 for each $1.00 invested • Rural transit has positive cost-benefit ratio
Transit Vision • Customer-centeredalternatives toprivate automobiles • TDOT is multimodal“mobility manager”
2025 Transit Plan • Part of TDOT’s long-range multimodal plan • Documents currenttransit services andfuture needs, costs,funding, marketing • Identifies major future projects • Contains transit agency and public input
Transit Plan • Goals and Objectives • Initial Findings • Plan Schedule
Draft Goals and Objectives • Triple ridership by 2025 • Improve service quality and safety • Create transit systems and services that enhance quality of life • Establish stable/reliable funding • Promote best practices • Encourage public-private partnerships • Develop user-friendlymodal connections
Benefits of GrowingTransit Ridership by 2025 • Quality of Life • Reduce traffic congestion • Support livable communities • Air Quality in Metropolitan Areas • Social Benefits • Transportation for older citizens & others • Economic costs of new infrastructure
Transit Ridership Growth is Achievable! • Increase service to match growth in population • Start service in new emerging markets • Construct “New Start” transit projects: • Memphis Light Rail • Nashville Commuter Rail • Gatlinburg / Pigeon Forge / Sevierville BRT
Programmatic Improvement Areas • Vehicle Procurement • Improve procurement process and reduce costs • Planning • TDOT facilitate peer review program among local transit agencies
Programmatic Improvement Areas, cont. • Safety and Training Oversight • Enhance training • Link up with insurers for training and technology • Marketing • Clarify roles for all parties (including TDOT) • Help organize and support transit advocacy
Programmatic Improvement Areas, cont. • Technology Transfer • TDOT overall transit technology program management • Access TN university research centers for help
Cost of Additional Service Operating Cost Requirements(millions of year 2000 dollars)
Cost of Additional Service Capital Costs(millions of year 2000 dollars)
Funding Objectives • Predictable and consistent funding stream • Adequate and growing • Allows multi-year commitments to large capital projects • Allows state to plan for — or limit exposure for state share of — high capital cost projects • Funding alternatives will be developed in TDOT Multi-Modal Plan
Options for New Local Funding • Increase gasoline tax • Increase non-gasoline motor fuel tax (diesel and CNG) • Special sales tax • Increase vehicle registration fee • Vehicle excise / personal property tax
Preparing the Plan • Steering Committee • Transit agencies speak out on goals/needs • Extensive publicoutreach • Stakeholder groups anduser surveys • Details on TDOT Web Site TDOT.state.tn.us/TNTRANSIT25
Plan Schedule • June-October 2003: review, comment, public involvement • Early fall 2003:finalize as transit resourcedocument for long-range multimodal transportation plan
Transit Plan is One Part of the Long-Range Multimodal Plan • Aviation Plan • Bike/Pedestrian Plan • Freight Plan • Highway Plan • Rail Plan • Transit Plan The long-range multimodal planning process will begin this year and take about 18 months.