1 / 18

Determination of Short-Chain Branching Distribution of Polyethylene via IR5-GPC

Determination of Short-Chain Branching Distribution of Polyethylene via IR5-GPC. Youlu Yu * and Paul J. DesLauriers Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP Bartlesville Research & Technology Center Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74006 February 27 – March 2, 2011

fleur-glass
Télécharger la présentation

Determination of Short-Chain Branching Distribution of Polyethylene via IR5-GPC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Determination of Short-Chain Branching Distribution of Polyethylene via IR5-GPC Youlu Yu* and Paul J. DesLauriers Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP Bartlesville Research & Technology Center Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74006 February 27 – March 2, 2011 International Polyolefins Conference 2011 Hilton Houston North, Houston, Texas

  2. Outline • Introduction • Instrumentation • Methodology • Data handling/processing • Calibration • Error analysis • Practical Aspects • Comparison with Other Techniques • Conclusions

  3. Conventional Techniques for PE SCB Distributional Determination • SGF-NMR • Classic method • SGF Fractionation + NMR • Off-line technique • Tedious & labor intensive • Limited resolution • Large quantity of solvent/waste • On-line SEC-FTIR • Pioneered by DesLauriers et al. (DesLauriers, Rohlfing, Hsieh, 2002, Polymer, 43, 159) • On-line technique • Fast turn-around • Chemometrics for data analysis • Liquid nitrogen needed • Batch mode

  4. SGF-NMR vs. Online SEC-FTIR SGF-NMR takes days of operation for one sample SEC-FTIR takes hours of operation for one sample DesLauriers, Rohlfing, Hsieh, Polymer, 43, 2002, 159

  5. Desired Improvements in Online SCB Determination Technique • With today’s PE business environment where safer, faster, and cheaper operations are required, there are still rooms for improvements with the Online SEC-FTIR SCB determination technique in the following areas: • Eliminating liquid nitrogen usage • Less human intervention • Less system upsets • Easier operation • System suitable for continuous operations • Reduced human intervention • Improved productivity • Easy/straight forward data processing

  6. IR5 Detector • Manufactured by Polymer Characterization, S.A. Spain (J. Montesinos, R. Tarin, A. Ortin, B. Monrabal, 1stInternantional Conference of Polyolefins Characterization, 2006, Houston) • A fixed-band IR spectrometer with five optical filters for detection of adsorbance in five different mid-IR bands • Thermoelectrically-cooled MCT detector • Advanced optics to achieve high energy throughput • High temperature capability • Specifically designed for polyolefins characterization • Minimal mixing in cell (cell volume 11.3 uL) • No liquid N2 needed • Suitable for continuous GPC and high-throughput GPC applications

  7. Waste IR5-GPC Instrumentation Computer A Computer B Solvent Reservoir Data Box Pump Injector Columns IR5

  8. SCB Calibration and Calculation • SCB calculation based on intensity ratios • Two intensity ratios tested: ICH3/ICH2 and ICH3/Iall C-H • Chain-end effect correction based on polymer chemistry (# CE/molecule) • Calibration curve (i.e. intensity ratio as a function of SCB content) needed • Polymers of known SCB contents and with flat SCB distribution employed • Data points influenced by chain-end effect excluded from the calibration • MW/MWD determined by the relative method using the integral calibration method and broad MWD PE standard • Both the “compensate” and “un-compensate” modes explored • All data processing performed using in-house developed software

  9. SCB Calibration and Calculation (E/H Copolymers)

  10. Error Analysis • Uncertainty defined by signal to noise ratio (S/N)

  11. Simulated SCB Error Map 28% 5% Detection limit @ 0.5 – 1 SCB/1,000 TC if CH2 S/N at 2,000 – 3,000

  12. SCB Distributional Profile via IR5-GPC(4 columns; flowrate=1.0 mL/min; conc. =1.5 mg/mL; injvol=400 uL) Error bars significantly larger at the two ends where S/N poorer

  13. Reducing Determination Uncertainty • Minimize low-frequency noise • Stable power voltage • Good environmental control • Room temperature affecting results significantly • Increase signal intensity • Increase sample concentration • Increase injection volume • Increase flow rate • Reduce number of columns  • Increase injection volume • Increase flow rate • Reduce number of columns

  14. Concentration Effect • Separation efficiency and signal S/N trade-off • Too high a polymer concentration causing MWD and SCBD distortion

  15. PracticalAspects • Environment control • Both detection accuracy and precision affected by environment temperature • Chain ends effect • Imperfect separation at the low MW end causing significant errors in SCB contents

  16. Comparison with NMR • IR5-GPC results generally in very good agreement with NMR results • Calibration less accommodating to branching types than Chemometrics

  17. Comparison with SEC-FTIR IR5-GPC 4 columns; 1.0 mL/min; 0.4 mL; 1.5 mg/mL SEC-FTIR 2 columns; 1.0 mL/min, 0.5 mL; 2.0 mg/mL IR5-GPC results in very good agreement with SEC-FTIR

  18. Conclusions • IR5-GPC a robust SCB distribution determination technique • No liquid N2 needed • Continuous process • No human intervention between samples • Easy operation and simple data processing • SCB precision determined by IR5 signal S/N • ICH3/ICH2 gives better results • GPC column fractionation efficiency and SCB precision trade off • Too high a polymer concentration can cause MWD and SCBD distortion • No significant difference found between the “compensate” mode and the “un-compensate” mode • Results in good agreement with NMR and SEC-FTIR • SCB at LMW end significantly affected by column separation efficiency and the presence of impurity/contamination • Maintaining stable instrument environment essential for data accuracy and precision

More Related