370 likes | 491 Vues
The C-DAT (Countering Difficult Air Targets) theme day focuses on identifying and improving countermeasures against various air threats. Presenters including Mr. Robin Horne, Maj. Michelle Crawford, Dr. Philip Smith, and Mr. Andrew Burles will outline objectives, current capabilities, and future perspectives in addressing threats from rockets, drones, and other airborne challenges. The agenda includes defining the operational scope, discussing maritime perspectives, and exploring future effector developments, with a strong emphasis on collaboration and innovative technologies to enhance air defense systems.
E N D
Welcome Defence Technology & Innovation CentreWeapons Integrated Technology TeamCDE theme day Countering Difficult Air Targets (C-DAT)
Mr Robin Horne Maj Michelle Crawford Dr Philip Smith Mr Andrew Burles PL 4 DTIC SO2 J3 Ops - Jt GBAD HQ Dstl Dstl Today’s presenters
Agenda • Define objectives, scope, boundaries
Agenda • Define objectives, scope, boundaries • Introduce C-DAT
Agenda • Define objectives, scope, boundaries • Introduce C-DAT • Introduce current capability & operational perspective
Agenda • Define objectives, scope, boundaries • Introduce C-DAT • Introduce current capability & operational perspective • Coffee
Agenda • Define objectives, scope, boundaries • Introduce C-DAT • Introduce current capability & operational perspective • Coffee • Introduce Maritime perspective
Agenda • Define objectives, scope, boundaries • Introduce C-DAT • Introduce current capability & operational perspective • Coffee • Introduce Maritime perspective • A glimpse into the future
Agenda • Define objectives, scope, boundaries • Introduce C-DAT • Introduce current capability & operational perspective • Coffee • Introduce Maritime perspective • A glimpse into the future • Wash-up
Agenda • Define objectives, scope, boundaries • Introduce C-DAT • Introduce current capability & operational perspective • Coffee • Introduce Maritime perspective • A glimpse into the future • Wash-up • How & what to submit
Objective • Reduce or eliminate threat caused by difficult air targets
Scope • We want to improve our ability to counter: • Rockets, artillery & mortars (C-RAM) • Tactical Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles • We are concerned about: • Non-state actors • Asymmetric/homemade threats • The proliferation of sophisticated kit
What is covered by this call • DRIT • Detection • Recognition • Identification • Track • Air Situational Awareness • Command and control • Dynamic Air Defence Resource Allocation • Deny enemy capability through • Interception (prior to firing) • Effectors (once in flight)
Definitions - RAM • Rockets Artillery & Mortars (RAM) • Indirect Fire weapons (IDF)
Definitions - TUAV • Tactical Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles (TUAV) • Micro UAV • Mini UAV • MALE
Non-State Threat - RAM • 240mm • Homemade 65MM
Non-State Threat – TUAV • Hezbollah UAVs over Lebanon/Israel • Hezbollah UAV post flight
Asymmetric – TUAV Model aircraft
Asymmetric – TUAV Model aircraft + GPS/Autopilot
Asymmetric – TUAV Model aircraft + GPS/Autopilot + Payload = Threat
Asymmetric – Light Aircraft Tamil Tigers modified ZLIN 143
Definitions – threat credibility • Threat credibility depends on: • Readiness to use • Practical readiness of the target weapons system • Political will • Ability to use • Detection capability • Targeting • Availability/capability/survivability of launch • Probability of encounter • May not be through direct confrontation with country of origin
Future Effectors • Kinetic effectors: • Rapid integration onto platform • Improved Lethality at range • Ability to take out Difficult Air Targets • Reduced collateral damage • Low cost seeker trade-offs • Rapid system upgrade • Missile commonality • Non-Kinetic effectors: • Directed Energy Weapons • Soft-Kill • ?
Kill chain • The kill chain is made up of a number of discrete events. • Each event has a time penalty: • Time to detect (Td) + Time to inform (Ti) + Time to launch (Tl) + Time to cue (Tc) + Time to kill (Tk) • Anything that can reduce these time penalties improves the chances of success • We need a networked whole kill chain approach to optimise response time and: • Integrate available ABAD, GBAD and MFAD assets • Maximise enabler system effectiveness • Ensure that we engage targets in effector probability-of-kill priority. Within this we need to improve, develop and integrate: • Air target ID and tracking concepts and technology • Air Situational Awareness • Command and control • Dynamic AD Resource Allocation
Things to think about • Defeat or disrupt • Troops must want to use it • Cost of use V’s cost of threat • The target signature • Your signature • SWaP • Manning levels • Operational environment
Things to think about • Defeat or disrupt • Troops must want to use it • Cost of use V’s cost of threat • The target signature • Your signature • SWaP • Manning levels • Operational environment
Bid hints Reasonable GFA demands Give tangible deliverables Identify subcontractor relationship Implications to exploitation route Identify the innovation Clearly identify IPR ownership One step at a time