1 / 68

Lasers and aviation Safety

Patrick Murphy Executive Director, International Laser Display Association SAE G-10T Committee Member. Lasers and aviation Safety. Lasers and Aviation Safety. Laser pointer threat Laser uses in airspace Laser hazards in airspace Hazard factors Hazard reduction Regulation and control.

flynn-silva
Télécharger la présentation

Lasers and aviation Safety

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Patrick Murphy Executive Director, International Laser Display Association SAE G-10T Committee Member Lasers and aviation Safety

  2. Lasers and Aviation Safety • Laser pointer threat • Laser uses in airspace • Laser hazards in airspace • Hazard factors • Hazard reduction • Regulation and control

  3. Laser pointer threat • Steady rise in incidents • Due to: • Lower cost • Higher powers(100-300 mW) • Green (more visible) • Internet (easy to obtain)

  4. Laser pointer threat • January 1 – February 23, 2009: 148 laser illuminations of aircraft in the U.S. alone • 2.7 per day • February 22: 12 illuminations of aircraft landing at Sea-Tac

  5. Laser pointer threat -- Australia • 140 incidents Jan. - April 2008 • March 2008 “coordinated attacks” in Sydney • Led to NSW ban on laser pointer import, sales and possession

  6. Why not ban laser beams from airspace?

  7. Laser use in airspace • “Guide star” lasers used in astronomy • Satellite communications and ranging • Atmospheric remote sensing

  8. Laser use in airspace • Aircraft warning • Visual Warning System used in Washington Metropolitan Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) • 7 locations • Green and red lasers, 1.5 watts • Visible up to 20 nautical miles away

  9. Laser use in airspace • Entertainment • Nightly show at a fixed site (theme parks) • Infrequent shows at various sites (special events) • Usually only 30-60 minutes long

  10. Not practical to ban lasers from airspace • Unduly restricts legitimate users • Does not prevent accidental illumination incidents • Does not stop deliberate targeting of aircraft • Ignorance – does not know effects • Malice – trying to cause harm

  11. How are laser beams hazardous to aviation?

  12. Primary hazard is to pilots • From visible laser beams: • Visual interference during critical phases of flight • Distraction, glare and flashblindness • Potential eye damage during any phase of flight • From non-visible (infrared, ultraviolet) beams: • Potential eye damage during any phase of flight

  13. Visual interference • Distraction • Distracting, but can see past the light • 0.05 μW/cm2 • 5 mW laser pointer at 3,700 feet (1130m)

  14. Visual interference • Glare • Interferes with vision • 5.0 μW/cm2 • 5 mW laser pointer at 1,200 feet (365m)

  15. Visual interference • Temporary flashblindness • Blocks vision during and after exposure • 100 μW/cm2 • 5 mW laser pointer at 350 feet (107m)

  16. Visual interference does affect pilots • 2004 FAA simulator study • Pilots flew a challenging “short-final” approach • Glare and flashblindness significant • Adverse effects for more than 50% of the approaches • 20-25% rate of aborted landings

  17. Laser exposure in police helicopters

  18. Potential eye damage • Can be caused by visible or non-visible laser beams, at power above the MPE • Unlikely, though possible • Few confirmed reports • “Damage” could be pre- or post-exposure • Previous eye injuries or abormalities • Rubbing the eye after exposure

  19. Lasers vs. searchlights: Toet, 2009 • High-intensity searchlights • Carbon arc light, HID arc light, HMI “Dominator”, 4K xenon Skytracker • 3.5 mW laser from RadioShack • Aimed at helicopter in San Antonio tests

  20. Lasers vs. searchlights: Toet, 2009 • At 200-500 meters, no adverse effects from searchlights • Laser pointer “impossible to perceive details outside … impact was unacceptable”. • Glare, flashblindness and afterimages from laser; not from searchlights • Laser beam appeared suddenly, “thus causing additional startle"

  21. Hazards summary

  22. A plea for properly proportioned diagrams!

  23. 6 watt, 532 nm, 1.1 mrad laser • Eye hazard to 1600 feet (488m) • Flashblindness to 8200 feet (1.5 mi/2.5 km) • Glare to 36,800 feet (7 mi/11.2 km) • Distraction to 368,000 feet (70 mi/112 km)

  24. What are the factors affecting the hazard level?

  25. Factors affecting hazard level • Laser factors • Power, divergence, visible/non-visible, wavelength, pulsed vs. CW • Operational factors • Area covered in sky (stationary vs. moving) • Location relative to airports • Terminated vs. non-terminated beams • Use of airspace observers (spotters) • Use of automated detection (radar, cameras)

  26. Factors affecting hazard level (cont. 1) • Situational factors • Day vs. night • Aircraft speed and distance (helicopters at risk) • Laser pointer user factors • Deliberate (longer and more exposures) vs. accidental (short, single event)

  27. Factors affecting hazard level (cont. 2) • Pilot factors • Read NOTAMs • Flight phase (takeoff, landing, emergency) • Pilot experience and training • Recognizing a laser event • Properly responding, to successfully avoid problems

  28. Factors affecting hazard level (cont. 3) • Legal and regulatory • Follow aviation authority procedures • FAA, CDRH in US • Laws against interference • Restrict the sale or use of laser devices • May not be practical • May give false sense of security • Does not guard against deliberate intent

  29. Single most effective way to reduce the hazard?

  30. Pilot training reduces the hazard • Laser illuminations can be managed with training • Effective against both accidental and deliberate exposures • Not a substitute for regulations and restrictions on law-abiding laser users

  31. Other important ways to reduce the hazard

  32. Laser sellers and manufacturers • Educate heavy laser pointer users • www.LaserPointerSafety.com • Self-regulation/education by laser pointer sellers • Package inserts • Permanent labels on laser pointers • Laser pointer seller participation in regulatory efforts • Laser pointer seller trade association

  33. www.LaserPointerSafety.com • Facts, news and links on laser pointer safety • Help reduce annoying and dangerous incidents • “Bad for safety” – pilots, drivers • “Bad for yourself” – possible arrest, fines, jail • “Bad for pointers” – misuse will lead to bans

  34. Regulatory and standards bodies • Require an “Aviation Safety Label” on appropriate lasers • Low cost and easy to implement • Labels are already required on lasers • Addresses a hazard not on previous labels • Provides legal notice to users • Helps establish willful intent

  35. Aircraft warning on label WARNING: DO NOT SHINE YOUR LASER AT AN AIRCRAFT Shooting a laser at an aircraft is considered a felony in the U.S.

  36. ILDA’s Aviation Safety Label proposal • Label required on • Lasers with visible beams • Class 3 and Class 4 • Longest dimension is 15 inches or less:“handheld”

  37. ILDA’s Aviation Safety Label proposal (2) • Required text varies, depending on space available for label

  38. ILDA’s Aviation Safety Label proposal (3) • Details required in User Manual • Label text can vary for special lasers • Laser Rescue Flare • “DO NOT aim at or near aircraft, except to make your position known in an emergency situation or when a cooperating aircraft is looking for your signal. It is otherwise illegal to aim at aircraft and distract pilots.” • Lasers used by government to notify or aid pilots

  39. ILDA’s Aviation Safety Label proposal (4) • Exemptions: • Lasers larger than “handheld” • High-divergence or diffuse beam • <5 µW/cm² at all distances beyond 500 feet • Visual equivalence formula • Takes wavelength into account • Equivalent of <5 µW/cm² at 500 feet at 555 nm • Diffracted lasers (“star” projectors)

  40. ILDA’s Aviation Safety Label proposal (5) • How to require? • Easiest for CDRH to suggest voluntary “guidance” • ILDA prefers mandated regulation

  41. What regulations must be followed in the U.S.?

  42. U.S. regulations • Federal Aviation Administration • Has no direct authority over laser uses • Requests that laser uses be reviewed in advance by aerospace specialists • Issues a “Letter of Non-Objection” if OK;a “Letter of Objection” if not OK

More Related